Sigman, I think you're missing the point, or perhaps let my title deceive you or something. This article is not by any means against our action in Iraq. In fact it outlines quite rationally exactly why the rest of the world can not and will not be able to get along with these folks. It has nothing to do with religion or Israel or anything other than Oil.
A quick summary would be this. If you are the leader of any other country in the world and you want to build an army and "weapons of mass destruction" and the "Bomb" then you first have to have an economy, you have to have a gross national product that you can tax to pay for it, you have to have an infrastructure of business and manufacturing that you can tap to do it. The process of building this makes you part of the world economy and acclimatizes you to living in the world and interacting with your neighbors. Iraq, and the rest of the oil nations there, don't have this. They have little or no economy, they have no industry other than oil. They don't have to play nice, they don't even live in the same world as us. They have all the money that they need to do all these things without any of the other things that make the rest of us want to live happily together.
That is why the rest of the world is so confused by their behavior. There is absolutely no element in history they can use to find out what will happen if the US starts making preemptive strikes like this. However, the article also says that just because it's scary and you don't know exactly what will happen doesn't mean you shouldn't do it.
As far as I'm concerned this article presents a much better argument FOR doing it than trying to connect Saddam with 9/11 or anything else. These are reasons that made sense in the past, there are new reasons why folks believe we have to do this now.
Please read it, you'll find that it doesn't disagree with you at all!