WF-606A poor runtime @ 2 AA's

mag_newbie

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
7
Hi,

I received my Ultrafire WF-606A from dealextreme (sku 4238) this morning.
I put two new Energizer AAs (no rechargeables) in it and the output was
very good at first. But after only 45 minutes, it dropped to a very low level which
was not usable anymore.

Could someone please explain to me why the runtime is so poor ?
Maybe I should try to run some NiMH's instead?

The output at the beginning and after 45 minutes (same exposure etc.):



Here is a picture of the batteries I used:
 

Curious_character

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
1,211
Any flashlight that discharges a battery in that length of time will do much better with NiMH than alkaline. See here for the reason why.

c_c
 

mag_newbie

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
7
Any flashlight that discharges a battery in that length of time will do much better with NiMH than alkaline. See here for the reason why.

c_c

That was a quick response, thank you very much !
Very interesting article, I think I'm gonna try running the light with my eneloops later. :wave:
 

mag_newbie

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
7
Yep, the eneloops work much better. Runtime was 90mins before the output began to drop :thumbsup:

Thanks again :wave:
 

ampdude

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
4,584
Location
USA
The alkaline chemistry can't keep up with that kind of continuous current draw. Alkalines work best at either lower drains or else drains in bursts, so that the cell can recover.
 

Latest posts

Top