Is it harder to make type III finish in black vs OD?

leon2245

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
2,335
I figured market demands were the reason that most of Surefire's type III anodized finishes are in OD instead of black, until I noticed that the C3's OD finish is type III, but if you get it in black it's type II. SUrefire has other lights with a type III finish that are black. Wonder why they did this with the C3?
 

Tempest UK

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
1,692
Location
England
It may only be a $10 difference, but I am sure there are plenty of users (I'm not thinking in terms of CPF members) who don't mind about a scratched finish and see no reason to pay any extra for HA.

Regards,
Tempest
 

precisionworks

Flashaholic
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
6,623
Location
Benton Illinois
Type II & Type III coatings can be either undyed or dyed.

Type II coatings are thin, ranging from .0001" to .0010". By comparison, a sheet of copier paper is .0030".

Type III coatings run from .0010" to .0060".

If a Type III coating is dyed, it must also be sealed, which adds another process step and additional cost. Because the Type III process produces a much thicker coating, it also takes longer to perform.

Wonder why they did this with the C3?
Only Surefire knows:D
 

Bullzeyebill

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
12,164
Location
CA
Well it's not a thick layer.

Hard anodize, such as used on Arc and Surefire light is actually thinner than so called HaII, and bonds with Aluminum. I don't have my facts in front of me, but I have seen this mentioned on CPF several times over the past 5 years. I need to research.

Bill
 

tvodrd

*Flashaholic* ,
Joined
Dec 13, 2002
Messages
4,987
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Type III is done in a refrigerated tank, and at much higher current than Type II. After dyeing appearance can vary greatly with the coating's thickness which is a function of time/current. Black vs nat. adds very little to the price an order, in my experience!

I personally favor a .001"-.002" build, and have my own "secret" sealant process, which results in a bronzish olive drab. :D

Larry
 

greenstuffs

Banned
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
1,198
Location
Norman, OK
Hard anodize, such as used on Arc and Surefire light is actually thinner than so called HaII, and bonds with Aluminum. I don't have my facts in front of me, but I have seen this mentioned on CPF several times over the past 5 years. I need to research.

Bill

I've read that many times as well. It seems also that the HAII is thicker while being less resistant.
 

Gnufsh

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
242
Location
Shasta Lake, California
Type III is done in a refrigerated tank, and at much higher current than Type II. After dyeing appearance can vary greatly with the coating's thickness which is a function of time/current. Black vs nat. adds very little to the price an order, in my experience!

I personally favor a .001"-.002" build, and have my own "secret" sealant process, which results in a bronzish olive drab. :D

Larry

Yeah, but black makes them harder to find in the dark, when you need a light...
 

BabyDoc

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
1,245
Location
Beachwood, Ohio
My understanding is that a natural Type III coating uses unadulterated material and is inherently quite strong. The black coloring that is added to it to make a black coating slightly weakens it and makes it more susceptible to wear.

I have not read this before. However, my recent experience with a black Novatac p120 gives reason to accept this could be true. The finish doesn't seem to be holding up as well as I had expected. Hardly anybody complained about the olive version. Still, my black Fenix's are doing just fine. If Fenix isn't really using an anodizing process, I like what they are doing better than Novatac with black.
 
Top