Enzo Morocioli
Enlightened
Hello...
I've brought up this subject before a long time ago but it didn't really take off... The concept is really quite simple... Take the idea of a standard night-light... You know.. the kind they sell at hardware stores to mount in your bathroom?..They turn on when the main lights go out, and then when the natural light from the morning sun coming up hits the sensor, the night-light turns off...
So.. Have you ever very slowly shined a light at the photo sensor of the night-light in a dark room? If you do it careful enough, you'll notice that the night-light will slowly dim down, and eventually turn off... Ah.. This got me thinking. Watch this video AND this video to understand what I mean.
Many people these days are into variable brightness, multi-level, and so on. So... why not instead of developing a UI to manipulate the levels, just expand on the idea of a photo sensor?
The solution in my mind is simple.. Keep in mind that I am not very knowledgeable in circuitry so I don't know how 'real world' idea would work. But why not attach a photo sensor to the driver of the LED? Have the sensor mounted facing forward, on the edge of the bezel, and perhaps recessed a bit... The idea then being that aiming the flashlight at distant objects will not reflect enough light back to influence the photo sensor and so the LED will be bright, but that as the user shines the light on closer objects, the photo sensor will pick up on the reflected light and dim the LED to a level where the reflected light no longer is strong enough to influence the sensor.
This way, if you shine a light at a book page, the sensor will dim the LED way down to a level that is easy on the eyes, but as soon as you shine the light across the room, the sensor will raise the output level because it isn't detecting enough reflected light to dim the LED. In other words, it would be automatic brightness control. I understand this wouldn't work for many people, but I mean, in this age of innovation why not create it?
Has there been any designs like this? Would it work?
If you read all the way through this, thanks.. I'm very honestly interested in this concept and would like to determine if it is possible in any fashion.
All thoughts and ideas are welcome.
EDIT:5-18-2008
If I were to further describe the system, I would say that there is a tail-cap button, which allows a user to pick the tolerance of light received by the photo sensor, making it either: highly sensitive to light, moderately sensitive to light, or somewhat insensitive to light.
With this type of selection, the flashlight can be told to shift (dim and brighten) only between a specific range of sensitivity. That would enable the user to create a threshold of brightness, which would only vary in output by exactly the amount of lumen in the range between sensitivities.
So one click on the tailcap makes the photo sensor 0-32% sensitive (resulting in bright output that will only slightly respond to signal), two clicks makes it 32-64% sensitive (likely to be dimmer, but is not limited from being bright) and three clicks makes it 64-96% sensitive (likely dim or very dim, but again not limited from being bright) to light. Four clicks will always reset the sensitivity to 100% (infinitely and fluidly dim or bright depending on sensor input). Any one of the three sensitivities can be accessed upon clicking the proper amount for it. One long press turns the flashlight on and off.
We have to remember that the user is not modifying the brightness of the LED. The user is modifying the sensitivity of input from the photo sensor, which in turn affects the brightness.
But that entire explanation also distorts the root of the idea in a way. I'd much rather see a kind of fluid reaction to light levels, a real-time response to the environment. Maybe that would mean no user input at all. Just on, and off.
Sorry if I'm being long winded, but I've had this idea for a while, and I need to air it out.. Somebody, come shoot a hole in it, or perhaps make it come to fruition; either way it just needs to get settled. Lets build one together, or deem it impossible/unreasonable.
EDIT: 5-19-2008
So now, due to more thinking and development, there needs to be some set rules and requirements for this concept.
1.) It would not be the only light you had with you. It's a special purpose light, not general duty. (at least in this conceptual form)
2.) There would be no UI besides On and Off (at first). The photo sensor would be the only thing determining brightness, and its range of function would be between completely off, and the LEDs maximum brightness. (proof of concept)
a.) If there is a UI designed it would be made to adjust the gain and/or threshold max/min settings. (added once proof of concept was achieved)
3.) Add a function to disable the sensory system completely and have a way to immediately go to full brightness. (tactical operation)
4.) The flashlight should only be used in dark environments, where other light sources are not able to influence the input of the photo sensor.
a.) A calibration period may resolve this issue. Upon switching the flashlight on or 'activating' it, there would be a brief moment where the electronics would take a reading from the sensors, average them out (if there is more than one sensor), and then activate the LED at a level configured to coincide with sensor readings.
EDIT: 5-24-2008
Well, it's time for some pictures... It's going to take your bandwidth for a ride (just kidding)..These are pictures of the circuit board found in the night-light that you can see in the videos above.
In the top photo: The little blue cylinder on the bottom left of the circuit has "50 v, 1uF" written on it. Next to that is a three pronged black pot that says "mcr100-6, 031"..Above the two paddles, I see the CDS (cadmium photo resistor), followed by a capacitor banded "Gold, Green, Yellow, Red". Below the capacitor is a black cylinder that says "IN" and it has a silver band on the right side.. Printed on the PCB itself is "07V0, 94v-01, SCR" and in larger digital lettering there is a number "0709" in the center, under the paddles.
The second photo shows the electrical path of those components. From top down the solder points are "CDS, C1 (Red on left, Gold on right), Black Cylinder, AC input and lamp contacts, then three prongs of the black pot, and two from the blue cylinder."
According to the packaging, the lamp is taking 3.7v and an input of 120vac from the wall. Anyone think it's possible to modify the circuit to take an 18650 battery current?
Sorry if I'm not calling things by their proper name. I'll use the right words if I have them.
I've brought up this subject before a long time ago but it didn't really take off... The concept is really quite simple... Take the idea of a standard night-light... You know.. the kind they sell at hardware stores to mount in your bathroom?..They turn on when the main lights go out, and then when the natural light from the morning sun coming up hits the sensor, the night-light turns off...
So.. Have you ever very slowly shined a light at the photo sensor of the night-light in a dark room? If you do it careful enough, you'll notice that the night-light will slowly dim down, and eventually turn off... Ah.. This got me thinking. Watch this video AND this video to understand what I mean.
Many people these days are into variable brightness, multi-level, and so on. So... why not instead of developing a UI to manipulate the levels, just expand on the idea of a photo sensor?
The solution in my mind is simple.. Keep in mind that I am not very knowledgeable in circuitry so I don't know how 'real world' idea would work. But why not attach a photo sensor to the driver of the LED? Have the sensor mounted facing forward, on the edge of the bezel, and perhaps recessed a bit... The idea then being that aiming the flashlight at distant objects will not reflect enough light back to influence the photo sensor and so the LED will be bright, but that as the user shines the light on closer objects, the photo sensor will pick up on the reflected light and dim the LED to a level where the reflected light no longer is strong enough to influence the sensor.
This way, if you shine a light at a book page, the sensor will dim the LED way down to a level that is easy on the eyes, but as soon as you shine the light across the room, the sensor will raise the output level because it isn't detecting enough reflected light to dim the LED. In other words, it would be automatic brightness control. I understand this wouldn't work for many people, but I mean, in this age of innovation why not create it?
Has there been any designs like this? Would it work?
If you read all the way through this, thanks.. I'm very honestly interested in this concept and would like to determine if it is possible in any fashion.
All thoughts and ideas are welcome.
EDIT:5-18-2008
If I were to further describe the system, I would say that there is a tail-cap button, which allows a user to pick the tolerance of light received by the photo sensor, making it either: highly sensitive to light, moderately sensitive to light, or somewhat insensitive to light.
With this type of selection, the flashlight can be told to shift (dim and brighten) only between a specific range of sensitivity. That would enable the user to create a threshold of brightness, which would only vary in output by exactly the amount of lumen in the range between sensitivities.
So one click on the tailcap makes the photo sensor 0-32% sensitive (resulting in bright output that will only slightly respond to signal), two clicks makes it 32-64% sensitive (likely to be dimmer, but is not limited from being bright) and three clicks makes it 64-96% sensitive (likely dim or very dim, but again not limited from being bright) to light. Four clicks will always reset the sensitivity to 100% (infinitely and fluidly dim or bright depending on sensor input). Any one of the three sensitivities can be accessed upon clicking the proper amount for it. One long press turns the flashlight on and off.
We have to remember that the user is not modifying the brightness of the LED. The user is modifying the sensitivity of input from the photo sensor, which in turn affects the brightness.
But that entire explanation also distorts the root of the idea in a way. I'd much rather see a kind of fluid reaction to light levels, a real-time response to the environment. Maybe that would mean no user input at all. Just on, and off.
Sorry if I'm being long winded, but I've had this idea for a while, and I need to air it out.. Somebody, come shoot a hole in it, or perhaps make it come to fruition; either way it just needs to get settled. Lets build one together, or deem it impossible/unreasonable.
EDIT: 5-19-2008
So now, due to more thinking and development, there needs to be some set rules and requirements for this concept.
1.) It would not be the only light you had with you. It's a special purpose light, not general duty. (at least in this conceptual form)
2.) There would be no UI besides On and Off (at first). The photo sensor would be the only thing determining brightness, and its range of function would be between completely off, and the LEDs maximum brightness. (proof of concept)
a.) If there is a UI designed it would be made to adjust the gain and/or threshold max/min settings. (added once proof of concept was achieved)
3.) Add a function to disable the sensory system completely and have a way to immediately go to full brightness. (tactical operation)
4.) The flashlight should only be used in dark environments, where other light sources are not able to influence the input of the photo sensor.
a.) A calibration period may resolve this issue. Upon switching the flashlight on or 'activating' it, there would be a brief moment where the electronics would take a reading from the sensors, average them out (if there is more than one sensor), and then activate the LED at a level configured to coincide with sensor readings.
EDIT: 5-24-2008
Well, it's time for some pictures... It's going to take your bandwidth for a ride (just kidding)..These are pictures of the circuit board found in the night-light that you can see in the videos above.
In the top photo: The little blue cylinder on the bottom left of the circuit has "50 v, 1uF" written on it. Next to that is a three pronged black pot that says "mcr100-6, 031"..Above the two paddles, I see the CDS (cadmium photo resistor), followed by a capacitor banded "Gold, Green, Yellow, Red". Below the capacitor is a black cylinder that says "IN" and it has a silver band on the right side.. Printed on the PCB itself is "07V0, 94v-01, SCR" and in larger digital lettering there is a number "0709" in the center, under the paddles.
The second photo shows the electrical path of those components. From top down the solder points are "CDS, C1 (Red on left, Gold on right), Black Cylinder, AC input and lamp contacts, then three prongs of the black pot, and two from the blue cylinder."
According to the packaging, the lamp is taking 3.7v and an input of 120vac from the wall. Anyone think it's possible to modify the circuit to take an 18650 battery current?
Sorry if I'm not calling things by their proper name. I'll use the right words if I have them.
Last edited: