DX X2000 focusable P4 - beamshots - stay away from this

Status
Not open for further replies.

NickBose

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
317
Last edited by a moderator:

radu1976

Enlightened
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
851
Location
Red Deer, AB, Canada
Thank you for the advice and for the beamshots...indeed the tint is not the best one. I was 80% decided to buy a CR123 version quite soon
 

gratewhitehuntr

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
266
Location
Right behind you with a 6D Mag623 !!
Thank you for the advice and for the beamshots...indeed the tint is not the best one. I was 80% decided to buy a CR123 version quite soon
withstupid.gif
 

phantom23

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
2,044
I think everything is ok. Aspheric is always bluer than the reflector.
 

Tohuwabohu

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
184
Location
Germany
I have the RCR123 version of the X2000
The lens is not made of glass but of plastic.

Initial lux readings at 1m with my cheap luxmeter using a fully charged RCR123 are 10,000 at max. focus and 700 at full flood setting.

Runtime plot using the full flood setting:
x2000tm8.gif


In max. focus setting I see only approx. half the light output.
I don't know how good my lightbox is but I think most of the losses must be in the X2000 itself.
But even with these losses the "hotspot" is astonishingly bright when fully focused. But there is also only very small sidespill, I'm not yet sure if the light is really usefull.

The full flood setting is quite good for indoor use and as closeup worklight.
 

Tohuwabohu

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
184
Location
Germany
I just disassembled my X2000.
It was quite easy after I managed to unscrew the bezel ring by pressing it against the sole of a shoe.
With the plastic lens removed I could screw out the pill and then slide off the head from the battery tube.
dscf0171tg3.jpg

The emitter on the star board is held in its place by the stainless steel disc and the white plastic ring
Heat can only be transferred via the rim of the star.
dscf0177ms0.jpg

The contact board seen below the resistor has a diameter of 20mm.

Lots of space around the battery because they use the same diameter for the 3xAAA, the RCR123 and the 18650 version.
dscf0181hd6.jpg
 

Nos

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
461
Location
Germany
what are the lens diameter btw, i have some nice lenses from kd here, a simple exchange and a emitter mod could maybe make a good light out of this
 

kramer5150

Flashaholic
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
6,328
Location
Palo Alto, CA
You are evaluating an aspheric thrower indoors on a white wall?... :shakehead

I dont think anyone buys an aspheric thrower for its color tint, or beam perfection against a whitewall.
Take it outside and see how far it throws, that would play more to its strengths. It might make a good Q5-mod candidate. The adjustable aspherics I have owned were VERY useful close-range, when adjusted to flood.

Although the lack of any heatsinking could spell trouble, unless the emitter is driven at a lower level.
 
Last edited:

Tohuwabohu

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
184
Location
Germany
what are the lens diameter btw, i have some nice lenses from kd here, a simple exchange and a emitter mod could maybe make a good light out of this
The diameter including the flat rim is 28.5mm. The rim is 1.6mm thick.
The convex part of the lens has a diamater of approx. 21mm.
Central thickness is 8mm. Back side of the lens is flat.
 

Nos

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
461
Location
Germany
The diameter including the flat rim is 28.5mm. The rim is 1.6mm thick.
The convex part of the lens has a diamater of approx. 21mm.
Central thickness is 8mm. Back side of the lens is flat.

Thank you. :thumbsup:
 

alibaba

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
225
Location
the final frontier
I looked at these X2000's on DX but the only one that interested me was the one with the twist zoom feature (sku 14230) and it only seems to be available in 3-AAA format. I avoid that battery format and the slide zooming mechanism just seems like a poor design IMO. I'd like one of these with the twist mechanism and either 1 or 2-cr123 or 2-AA battery tubes.



What do you mean?
 
Last edited:

rizky_p

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,440
Location
13th Colony
You are evaluating an aspheric thrower indoors on a white wall?... :shakehead

I dont think anyone buys an aspheric thrower for its color tint, or beam perfection against a whitewall.
Take it outside and see how far it throws, that would play more to its strengths.

Excatly, longer distance shots please :)
 

NickBose

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
317
I agree that the flood is quite good indoor - very large and smooth. But the max focus is just pathetic. Sorry for the crappy beam shots as I don't have a tripod yet. They were taken at the same shutter speed and exposure, again the X2000 and the WF-600 Q2, target is a tree-top at about 40m.
The projected die of the X2000 P4 is obviously larger and less bright than the WF-600 hotspot.


WF-600 Q2
2756866562_25dd8ab79b.jpg

Larger version


X2000 P4
2756859928_8f4151d023.jpg

Larger version
 

merlocka

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
214
I agree that the flood is quite good indoor - very large and smooth. But the max focus is just pathetic. Sorry for the crappy beam shots as I don't have a tripod yet. They were taken at the same shutter speed and exposure, again the X2000 and the WF-600 Q2, target is a tree-top at about 40m.
The projected die of the X2000 P4 is obviously larger and less bright than the WF-600 hotspot.

That's the post I was waiting for (and somewhat expecting). Thanks.
 

Jesseri

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
66
Location
Finland
I got my CR123 version today. Yes, the light feels quite cheap but I can't see the reason why the focusing mechanism would/could fail anytime soon. The light is not waterproof.

I measured the current with my cheap DMM and got about 0.6A with full battery. Then i decided to take the light a part and noticed that there's no driver at all. There's just a series resistor limiting the current to the led.

I thought why not to add better driver for it and try to improve the heat sinking. Unfortunetely there isn't room for the better heatsink on the pill, so I just added some thermal grease to edges of the star. If the led will burn it will burn :).

I had a Tiablo A9 driver left from my previous A9P7 mod so I decided to use it. I know, it's not the best driver for single cell but it was the best I had.

The positive contact extrudes quite lot on the A9 driver so i had to do some modifications to tailcap so the R123 battery will fit. I removed the first retaining ring from the tailcap and grinded that extruding plastic off from the second retaining ring. That metallic cup is also gone.
This modification gave enough room for the battery and the tailcap will close completely.

Wow this sucker is quite bright and throws quite well. It throws almost as good as A9 and the hotspot is bigger, there's no spill tho. I'll try to take some beamshots today.

I begin to like aspherical setups more and more.
 
Last edited:

underconstruction

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
143
Location
MA
It looks like one could cut a circular piece out of a sheet of copper and epoxy the star to it for increased heatsinking. Of course you would have to cut a notch for the LED leads to go through.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top