Did they claim it was true? Or did they just report the story?
If any other were to claim the other drive by media companies were "not credible enough to overcome .." the thread would be locked.:shrug:
I don't know how Fox reported it, since I don't know any more about how it was presented there than anyone else does.
As for the claim that if anyone else had said they didn't find Fox credible, it would be closed, are you basing that on a belief that we consider certain broadcasters as sacred topics or something? It doesn't make sense.
Here again, is the reason you see such reduced rates of postings from moderators and administrators. Whatever they say, there's always someone claiming they have no right, or shouldn't say whatever they said. After awhile, it just gets to where we figure we'll back off and not post. I guess we still try once in a while, but it seems there's always someone willing to step forward and let us know we should only be "working" and not participating.
Doesn't it seem strange that some of us used to be very prolific posters?