LED Zeppelin
Flashlight Enthusiast
I finally finished some lights and had a nearly complete stable of Moby ****s, so I took the opportunity to take some beamshots. The only configuration missing from the herd is the tri-Ostar for which I have a sink but have yet to build one.
I spare the details of the hosts and concentrate on the running gear. All the Shark/pot lights are driven at 900-960 mA on hi, and the Quad-P7 at 2.8A.
From left to right, in order of appearance and number of LED dies:
1: Quad-R2 WG, (4) McR27XR, Shark/pot, (3) 17670, 11.1V
2: (9) R2 WG, (1) McR27XR, (6) McR19XR, (2) aspherics in McR19XR-interchangeable housings, tri-Shark, pot, (6) 17670, 7.4V
3: Quad-P7 DSWOJ, D2flex, (4) 18650, 14.8V
4: Tri-Ostar (6-die)+ tri-R2 WG ("Trinity"), (3) Fraen Ostar narrow beam, (3) McR17XR, tri-Shark, pot, (4) 26700 Emoli, 14.8V
Beamshots:
Camera settings constant @ ISO200, F3.5, 3 sec, white balance to sunshine, lights on hi. Lights aimed at the grove of trees in the distance @ 450'.
Quad R2:
9 X R2:
Quad P7:
Tri-Ostar/tri-R2:
In the foreground the small tree at center is at 35'. To the downhill left bend of the drive it's 200', the end of the split-rail fence is about 300', and beyond the fence across the street is a grove of trees at 450'.
It's easy to become jaded with the output of these. But even the quad-R2 funnelled through (4) McR27XR is objectively impressive with great throw and runtime. The 9 X R2 takes top throw honors. The quad-P7 and Trinity lights have comparable output, with the edge in lumens and spill going to the Trinity. They both throw comparably but the quad-P7 focuses its output into a brighter, smaller area. I'll have to concurr with Starfiretoo in that the quad-P7 represents the most "bang for the LED buck".
Edit: adding single LED lights for comparison, same camera settings
Mr X: X bin Lux V
Lambda P7 2D Mag mod, 3 X NiMH cells:
I spare the details of the hosts and concentrate on the running gear. All the Shark/pot lights are driven at 900-960 mA on hi, and the Quad-P7 at 2.8A.
From left to right, in order of appearance and number of LED dies:
1: Quad-R2 WG, (4) McR27XR, Shark/pot, (3) 17670, 11.1V
2: (9) R2 WG, (1) McR27XR, (6) McR19XR, (2) aspherics in McR19XR-interchangeable housings, tri-Shark, pot, (6) 17670, 7.4V
3: Quad-P7 DSWOJ, D2flex, (4) 18650, 14.8V
4: Tri-Ostar (6-die)+ tri-R2 WG ("Trinity"), (3) Fraen Ostar narrow beam, (3) McR17XR, tri-Shark, pot, (4) 26700 Emoli, 14.8V
Beamshots:
Camera settings constant @ ISO200, F3.5, 3 sec, white balance to sunshine, lights on hi. Lights aimed at the grove of trees in the distance @ 450'.
Quad R2:
9 X R2:
Quad P7:
Tri-Ostar/tri-R2:
In the foreground the small tree at center is at 35'. To the downhill left bend of the drive it's 200', the end of the split-rail fence is about 300', and beyond the fence across the street is a grove of trees at 450'.
It's easy to become jaded with the output of these. But even the quad-R2 funnelled through (4) McR27XR is objectively impressive with great throw and runtime. The 9 X R2 takes top throw honors. The quad-P7 and Trinity lights have comparable output, with the edge in lumens and spill going to the Trinity. They both throw comparably but the quad-P7 focuses its output into a brighter, smaller area. I'll have to concurr with Starfiretoo in that the quad-P7 represents the most "bang for the LED buck".
Edit: adding single LED lights for comparison, same camera settings
Mr X: X bin Lux V
Lambda P7 2D Mag mod, 3 X NiMH cells:
Last edited: