Is my logic off?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cornkid

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Charlottesville, Va
Had the U.S. put all of the money that went into the Iraq war into renewable energy, there would be no further need for international oil. The US would have the technology and infrastructure to run exclusively on renewable energy produced by solar (via new and improved solar panels) and wind energy. Transportation would be powered by electricity by means of energy storage devices (be it hydrogen or high-density li-ion batteries), and any remaining oil requirements would be sufficiently sourced by US oil. This new infrastructure would create millions of new jobs for Americans, and provide billions of dollars to the economy by selling these technologies to foreign countries.

Is there something wrong here?
 

RA40

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
1,397
Location
So. Cal
I think the $$ could be more efficiently used. However, what is occurring in Iraq also has importance. We see how it is after the time that has passed but back then...hard call. I would like to see an evolution in the infrastructure stateside but it is often met by environmental concerns. None easy to decide on.
 

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
Had the U.S. put all of the money that went into the Iraq war

"Went" is past tense; we have built a number of military bases in Iraq and will have a military presence there from now on. Not indefinitely, permanently.

More than half of all federal tax revenue goes towards military/defense.

into renewable energy, there would be no further need for international oil.

In order to achieve energy independence through a renewable source/s, it must be *at least as cheap and as available* as coal and oil. That's why all alternate energy forms to date (aside from *cheap* nuclear) have not been so successful.

renewable energy produced by solar (via new and improved solar panels)

Better/viable solar will eventually happen, not long after nanotech manufacturing techniques are perfected, but that's 10-20 years out, longer yet for it to be priced low enough for consumer use (a current household solar system begins at ~$15,000)

Transportation would be powered by electricity by means of energy storage devices (be it hydrogen or high-density li-ion batteries)

You need the clean/cheap alternate energy source for this (nuclear would work nicely), otherwise your car is just polluting the atmosphere with electricity from the dirty coal plant.

and provide billions of dollars to the economy by selling these technologies to foreign countries.

Foreign countries are miles ahead of us when it comes to energy tech, note the predominance of Japanese hybrid vehicles and France's almost exclusive use of nuclear energy.

Is there something wrong here?

There is, and it's going to take us quite a lot of time and money to fix it.
 

Empath

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 11, 2001
Messages
8,508
Location
Oregon
The controversy potential is too extreme for the Cafe. Please take the topics to CPFU, and continue it there. Those wishing to participate and/or follow along will welcome the discussion there. It's closed here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top