I'm trying to decide between the above, and would like some thoughts from those in the know. I like the beam profile and throw of the E1B. 5 lumens is just what I would choose for the low. Build quality and reliability presumably go without saying at that price too.
I'm also drawn to the ITP C9, and am surprised by the relative lack of commentary on this light. I like the beam produced by the mixed reflector, the 6 lumen low and the ability to ramp up and down (assuming it's intuitive and not too fiddly). I like the size - and the 180 lumens on full (I'm guessing the real lumen count is quite a bit less?)
Does anyone have both lights? If so, how does output compare - presumably the C9 is brighter, with more throw? Or does that optic level things out in terms of throw. How fiddly/reliable is the interface on the C9? How cool is the tint (I prefer warmer tints, but pure white is good too). At a third of the price of an E1B, this seems like a great light on paper.
EZAA looks interesting too, considering smaller form factor.
I'm also drawn to the ITP C9, and am surprised by the relative lack of commentary on this light. I like the beam produced by the mixed reflector, the 6 lumen low and the ability to ramp up and down (assuming it's intuitive and not too fiddly). I like the size - and the 180 lumens on full (I'm guessing the real lumen count is quite a bit less?)
Does anyone have both lights? If so, how does output compare - presumably the C9 is brighter, with more throw? Or does that optic level things out in terms of throw. How fiddly/reliable is the interface on the C9? How cool is the tint (I prefer warmer tints, but pure white is good too). At a third of the price of an E1B, this seems like a great light on paper.
EZAA looks interesting too, considering smaller form factor.