looking for a nice thrower reflector for MC-E and/or P7 - have been searching...

Moddoo

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,243
Location
Minnesota
Hello all,

I am working on a purpose built quad die "turbo head" for the C-series lights.

Can anyone introduce me to a proven thow reflector with a quality beam that is available for sale. (not a complete light)

I am aiming for something close to 2" (50mm) diameter.

I have read a bit about some of the aftermarket Mag reflectors, but haven't found any solid data on a perfect beam from a quad die.

Please help me help you.
:twothumbs
thanks
 

Sgt. LED

Flashaholic
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
7,486
Location
Chesapeake, Ohio
Have you tried cutting on an M3 or M6 reflector? I have nothing in mind that you could just buy alone but I would like to see someone take advantage of those 2 stock Surefire reflectors. They give good beams and have loads of aluminum that could be utilized for extra heatsinking.

Cut the stem off and open the aperture, who knows? Anyway I hope someone comes along to help you out with good advice that will actually help! :D
 

Justin Case

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
3,797
What do you mean by "C-series lights"? SureFire Classic, such as 6P, 9P, 12ZM, 6Z, etc? C Mag? Something else?

The best ~2" SureFire TurboHead thrower I've measured is the old SRTH (Short Rim TurboHead). My KT1/KT2 and T-62 THs are next, and they both seem to have slightly better hot spot lux than my KT4.

The challenge is to find a supply of SRTHs. Wayne Lagger at Lagger Professional Services still lists the SRTH on his web site for $195.

The SureFire Z46 head also seems to have good throw when its MN11 lamp assembly is powered by 2xIMR16340, but I can't make a direct 1-to-1 comparison to the SF THs since the Z46 can't fit my AW LED Turbo Tower.

The OpticsHQ TX3 TH might be another option. The smooth reflector ought to give excellent throw.
 
Last edited:

Moddoo

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,243
Location
Minnesota
Have you tried cutting on an M3 or M6 reflector? I have nothing in mind that you could just buy alone but I would like to see someone take advantage of those 2 stock Surefire reflectors. They give good beams and have loads of aluminum that could be utilized for extra heatsinking.

Cut the stem off and open the aperture, who knows? Anyway I hope someone comes along to help you out with good advice that will actually help! :D

No, I have not tried that.
However, I need a source that can provide approx 50 pieces at a reasonable cost.
 

Moddoo

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,243
Location
Minnesota
What do you mean by "C-series lights"? SureFire Classic, such as 6P, 9P, 12ZM, 6Z, etc? C Mag? Something else?

The best ~2" SureFire TurboHead thrower I've measured is the old SRTH (Short Rim TurboHead). My KT1/KT2 and T-62 THs are next, and they both seem to have slightly better hot spot lux than my KT4.

The challenge is to find a supply of SRTHs. Wayne Lagger at Lagger Professional Services still lists the SRTH on his web site for $195.

yes Surefire 6p, 9p, C2, C3, M2, M3, etc

That SRTH head blows my price point out of the water. But, I will look into it and the manufacturer.

I need a reflector only.

The heads will be custom built with proper heat management.
 

Justin Case

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
3,797
The OpticsHQ TX3 TH is $130 retail. It is available with a smooth reflector, which would probably give you the best throw (with some beam quality sacrifice).

The stock smooth plastic Mag reflector is also an excellent thrower. When combined with a single die LED like a Seoul P4, I get reasonably good beam quality as well (less so with a quad-die P7). And my hot spot lux measurement for this reflector exceeds the SRTH's by about 50%, which is clearly ahead of the KT1/KT2/T-62 by about 30%.

The KD OP Mag reflector with 15mm opening is not a good thrower.

SureFire made the SRTHs. They are old and no longer made. I'm sure that LPS's supply is simply remaining stock. When they are gone, that's it.

For best heat management, I would suggest avoiding a shock-isolated design. The KT1/KT2 THs have much better heat sinking capability than the KT4 (I've measured this using a thermocouple inserted into the TH/Turbo Tower interface). If you can design the TH such that you can install the driver in the "neck" region, that could be good. This is analogous to the Maglite mod case where you can use a Shark Sink to attach a driver to the inside of the Mag tube. Attaching the driver and potting it to the LED heat sink is a less desirable approach since the heat generation from the driver adds to the heat that the LED heat sink has to deal with.

With the current Turbo Tower designs, they all have an integral driver cavity at the base. If you pot the driver, then you add its heat generation to the relatively small mass of the Turbo Tower heat sink. If you don't pot the driver, then in high power applications, the driver could get very unhappy (especially for the small 14mm drivers).

If you can dispense with the driver cavity, then you can increase the thermal mass of the Turbo Tower, which is a good thing. And then if you can pot the driver elsewhere, that would be another good thing.

Another weakness of the current Turbo Tower designs is that the LED is typically secured only by a thermal glue interface between the top of the tower and the bottom of the LED. If you can solder the LED to the tower, that would be good. If you can figure out a mechanical attachment method, that would be good. Whatever the solution, IMO it would be desirable for a more secure LED attachment method so that the TH can be used with confidence in weaponlight applications.
 
Last edited:
Top