Ultrafire RL-2088 vs WF-1000L indoor beamshot

Here is a comparison of the latest high-output offering by Ultrafire, versus last year's top model.

Model: Ultrafire RL-2008
Range: 1m
ISO: 100
Aperture: f/10
Shutter: 1/125
Focal length: 15mm (70mm at 35mm sensor equivalent)
White Balance: Cloudy


Model: Ultrafire WF-1000L
Range: 1m
ISO: 100
Aperture: f/10
Shutter: 1/125
Focal length: 15mm (70mm at 35mm sensor equivalent)
White Balance: Cloudy


Side by Side Comparison


Reflectors

Note glow stickers are my customisation and are not standard.

Conclusions

• RL-2088 is heavier 631g with 3 batteries vs 402g with 2 batteries
• RL-2088 has a higher colour temperature (see the beamshot)
• RL-2088 has a larger hotspot (see the beamshot)
• RL-2088 has a slightly lower intensity (see the histograms)

The RL-2088 may for a satchel pocket where the WF-1000L may not, due to the form factor, but for hiking, emergency use or security work I'd prefer the WF-1000L.

The RL-2088 appears to be of slightly superior manufacture and finish to the WF-1000L.

Disclosure: I am a friend and customer of Hwaswys the maker and have run several group buys of Ultrafire products on britishblades.com

I have the 2088 light and while I was a little weary about trying it out I was really suprised at the fit and finish. Great light in my opinion. Just a little heavy but love the beam and the huge amount of light out the front. Thanks for the shots.