Q3*3 vs MCE/M

I got a Q3*3 light from Mzzlg. The model is M9X. It is a pilot version only.
Before mass production, I buy it for evaluation. M9X power consuming is 1.5A 2 Li Cell to drive 3 Q3 in serial. The MCE consuming is 1.4A 2 Li Cell to drive MCE in 2p2s (drive by AX2002 controller board).

0.2 meter beamshot

0.5M beamshot

1M beamshot

Relatively simple structure but effective. The heat can transfer to the host.

ldch 2Li controler board using LT1619 & ZXCT1009 to drive Q3*3 in serial(or MCE 4s)

Optical lens


120M
camera exposure:
Aperture: 5.6
Exposure: 1 seconds
ISO-1600
Focal length: 82
White balance: lighting
MX9

MCE


Outdoor Beamshots
camera exposure:
Aperture: 4.5
Exposure: 1 / 4 seconds
ISO-1600
Focal length: 27
White balance: lighting
M9X

MCE

Re: Q5*3 vs MCE/M

First two pic`s are to dark for comment. Second couple seems the Q5 setup is aimed higher...so tough to judge throw. The MC-E seem to have a brighter spill beam.

Neither light would be of interest to me. To big...to many like it already.

Re: Q5*3 vs MCE/M

Badbeams3 said:

First two pic`s are to dark for comment. Second couple seems the Q5 setup is aimed higher...so tough to judge throw. The MC-E seem to have a brighter spill beam.

Neither light would be of interest to me. To big...to many like it already.

Click to expand...

M9X has a smaller spotbeam, so MCE seems brighter. However the flood still MCE win.