Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for advice on which air rifle to purchase. I realize that this is CPF, I've tried airgunbbs and other forums, but I haven't been able to post or search airgunbbs (they're so exclusive, 3 days and I still haven't been "approved"). I remember a couple members mentioning them in the past, so I thought I'd post the question in general, with the hope that someone out there might have some insight.
I'm looking for a high powered model for backyard plinking, target practice, and pest control. I had been saving up for a firearm, but considering the liberal atmosphere in Mass, and my "neighbors" from the Senior Citizens Home, (who like to leave lottery tickets all over my front lawn, call the police if I walk with a flashlight at night, and call the fire dept. for "out of control" open pit barbecues) I've been thinking an air rifle would be discrete enough to shoot on my property, and legal if someone calls the police.
I have a Daisy 22x, which I find to be great for target practice. Unfortunately, it's been having problems. The early ones were plagued with factory defects, so I'm trying to get Daisy to replace it. The problem is I seem to be a better shot than the rifle itself, especially with a scope. This is especially irritating, and now that I have nothing to practice with, I'm seriously considering something with more power and precision.
I'd never shot a .22 air rifle before discovering the 22x, and I'd have to say I'm hooked. After doing some research, I understand .177 flies straighter and at higher velocities, .22 is slower but offers 70% more power and efficiency, and .20 maintains the straighter flight profile of the lighter pellet while offering 40% more power and less drift. I'm fairly certain I'd prefer a .22 or .20 rifle.
I've considered several spring-powered rifles, such as the Gamo 440 (.22/$185), 890 (.22/$200), and Benjamin-Sheridan RM622 (.22/$200). I like the power and lack of maintenance, but the recoil tends to turn me off. Not the force, I have no problem with .45, .306, and 10guage firearms. As I understand it, the spring rifle's dual recoil action destroys scopes, meaning I'd have to purchase an scope designed for spring air rifles, and a stop to prevent creep. I've also heard that the recoil action is less than realistic.
The other option is Pre-Charged Pneumatic (PCP), which is roughly twice the price, but offers higher power, and multiple shots, without any destructive recoil. The downside is the expensive High Pressure Air (HPA) pump, compressor, or scuba tank required. I've been seriously considering the Korean rifles, such as the RWS Career 707 (.20or.22/$500), Shin Sung Career 707(.20or.22/$500), and Eun Jin Sumatra (.20or.22/$400). I've also looked at the Air Arms 410 (.22/$600-$700 for XHP). From the limited information I've come across, most consider the Korean rifles ugly, but those who have fired them compared to the Air Arms 410 consider them the superior rifle. They're also cheaper. Can anyone offer any input?
Some of my concerns are, PCP vs. Spring air, are they worth the investment? Will PCPs rust or break down over time, compared to the user serviceable spring rifles? If I spend $400-$600, I'd like it to last as long as I do. I'm a meticulous owner, so it would be properly cared for.
Are all Korean rifles of the same quality/manufacture? The Sumatra seems to have the better magazine mechanism, but fewer power adjustments. Which is better? Should I indeed be taking the AA 410 more seriously/is it worth the extra cash?
Also, any experience with .20 vs. .22? I've used .22, but .20 owners seem to swear by them. I mostly trap the rodents and relocate the squirrels (mostly reds) that live in the attic, but they are getting smarter and I haven't managed to catch any in a month, and I still hear them chewing in the walls above my bed at night, and in the walls of the 1st floor, etc. Aside from them, the only other pests would be the flocks of crows and the occasional woodchuck that tries to nest under the house. I have no problem compensating for the .22s more pronounced flight profile, but is the .20 that much better? Will I have a problem feeding it?
As and aside I'm trying to repair a Crosman .22 38T. It leaks something furious, and there's a few parts that don't seem to be in the right place (not the first owner to have this one apart, I'm certain...). Anyone with any ideas?
I'm thinking about buying a pistol if I can't get it repaired or just to avoid buying prodigious amounts of 12g powerlets. HW40 ($155) vs. HW45 ($345)? Again, .20 or .22?
Lastly, anyone in the US know of any legislation considering air guns I should be aware of? In Mass? I've done my homework, but I'm sure there's something I've missed.
I realize this is a shot in the dark, but I'd appreciate and information, opinions, or experience you have to offer, thanks guys! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
I'm looking for advice on which air rifle to purchase. I realize that this is CPF, I've tried airgunbbs and other forums, but I haven't been able to post or search airgunbbs (they're so exclusive, 3 days and I still haven't been "approved"). I remember a couple members mentioning them in the past, so I thought I'd post the question in general, with the hope that someone out there might have some insight.
I'm looking for a high powered model for backyard plinking, target practice, and pest control. I had been saving up for a firearm, but considering the liberal atmosphere in Mass, and my "neighbors" from the Senior Citizens Home, (who like to leave lottery tickets all over my front lawn, call the police if I walk with a flashlight at night, and call the fire dept. for "out of control" open pit barbecues) I've been thinking an air rifle would be discrete enough to shoot on my property, and legal if someone calls the police.
I have a Daisy 22x, which I find to be great for target practice. Unfortunately, it's been having problems. The early ones were plagued with factory defects, so I'm trying to get Daisy to replace it. The problem is I seem to be a better shot than the rifle itself, especially with a scope. This is especially irritating, and now that I have nothing to practice with, I'm seriously considering something with more power and precision.
I'd never shot a .22 air rifle before discovering the 22x, and I'd have to say I'm hooked. After doing some research, I understand .177 flies straighter and at higher velocities, .22 is slower but offers 70% more power and efficiency, and .20 maintains the straighter flight profile of the lighter pellet while offering 40% more power and less drift. I'm fairly certain I'd prefer a .22 or .20 rifle.
I've considered several spring-powered rifles, such as the Gamo 440 (.22/$185), 890 (.22/$200), and Benjamin-Sheridan RM622 (.22/$200). I like the power and lack of maintenance, but the recoil tends to turn me off. Not the force, I have no problem with .45, .306, and 10guage firearms. As I understand it, the spring rifle's dual recoil action destroys scopes, meaning I'd have to purchase an scope designed for spring air rifles, and a stop to prevent creep. I've also heard that the recoil action is less than realistic.
The other option is Pre-Charged Pneumatic (PCP), which is roughly twice the price, but offers higher power, and multiple shots, without any destructive recoil. The downside is the expensive High Pressure Air (HPA) pump, compressor, or scuba tank required. I've been seriously considering the Korean rifles, such as the RWS Career 707 (.20or.22/$500), Shin Sung Career 707(.20or.22/$500), and Eun Jin Sumatra (.20or.22/$400). I've also looked at the Air Arms 410 (.22/$600-$700 for XHP). From the limited information I've come across, most consider the Korean rifles ugly, but those who have fired them compared to the Air Arms 410 consider them the superior rifle. They're also cheaper. Can anyone offer any input?
Some of my concerns are, PCP vs. Spring air, are they worth the investment? Will PCPs rust or break down over time, compared to the user serviceable spring rifles? If I spend $400-$600, I'd like it to last as long as I do. I'm a meticulous owner, so it would be properly cared for.
Are all Korean rifles of the same quality/manufacture? The Sumatra seems to have the better magazine mechanism, but fewer power adjustments. Which is better? Should I indeed be taking the AA 410 more seriously/is it worth the extra cash?
Also, any experience with .20 vs. .22? I've used .22, but .20 owners seem to swear by them. I mostly trap the rodents and relocate the squirrels (mostly reds) that live in the attic, but they are getting smarter and I haven't managed to catch any in a month, and I still hear them chewing in the walls above my bed at night, and in the walls of the 1st floor, etc. Aside from them, the only other pests would be the flocks of crows and the occasional woodchuck that tries to nest under the house. I have no problem compensating for the .22s more pronounced flight profile, but is the .20 that much better? Will I have a problem feeding it?
As and aside I'm trying to repair a Crosman .22 38T. It leaks something furious, and there's a few parts that don't seem to be in the right place (not the first owner to have this one apart, I'm certain...). Anyone with any ideas?
I'm thinking about buying a pistol if I can't get it repaired or just to avoid buying prodigious amounts of 12g powerlets. HW40 ($155) vs. HW45 ($345)? Again, .20 or .22?
Lastly, anyone in the US know of any legislation considering air guns I should be aware of? In Mass? I've done my homework, but I'm sure there's something I've missed.
I realize this is a shot in the dark, but I'd appreciate and information, opinions, or experience you have to offer, thanks guys! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif