Not impressed with my Olight M30 (Now Happy)

CM2010

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
243
Bought this light about 6 weeks ago and thought it would be alot better than it actually is,or maybe there is something wrong with it and its not putting out what it should?

I`ll put up 2 pics for comparison,the M30 first and a M20 R5 second and you can see how dull it looks on the highest setting:

2d6gyv.jpg


1zxqwww.jpg



Updated shot:

M30 2 X 18650`s

mwppon.jpg
 
Last edited:

ti-force

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
1,266
Location
Georgia, U.S.
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Uh, yeah I'd say something is wrong there. I don't know much about that light, but it almost looks as if it's stuck in low mode or something:thinking:.
 
Last edited:

mrcandyman

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
38
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Ya, that doesn't look right. I tried one out in a store a few days ago and it was BRIGHT. I have no comparison with an M20 but I would think the M30 would have put out much more light than your pic if it was running properly
 

HIDblue

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
872
Location
California
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

There's definitely something wrong with your M30. I have a buddy who has one and his M30 blows my M20 out of the water. Like the previous post, looks like you're stuck in low mode. Check out the review section and do a search of M30's and you'll find directions on how to operate the UI. Hopefully, that's all it is. Otherwise, reach out to the vendor you bought it from for instructions.
 

carrot

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,240
Location
New York City
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

1st, the silly questions:
Does it have fresh batteries? Did you use the "S" button to switch output levels?

2nd, what distance is that?

Reason I ask is, the M30 is not known to be a particularly good thrower (whereas the M20 is designed to be), it just has a lot of output and is great midrange.
 

ti-force

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
1,266
Location
Georgia, U.S.
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

I still think something is wrong, whether it's a UI misunderstanding or low batteries. If you look at the M20 you can see the hot spot very easily, but you can also see how bright the spill is from a light that's more of a thrower. I think at the very least, the spill in the picture of the M30 should be brighter than the spill in the picture of the M20. You can also see that the spill from the M20 lights up one and a half sections of fence, and the M30 lights up two and 1/4 sections of fence, but it's very dim.
 
Last edited:

dfdapd

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
3
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

I just bought my M30 a month ago and I love it. Seems there is something wrong with yours. I cannot believe the throw and spill it has. Take that for what it is worth being I usually carry a Ultrastinger on duty belt.
 

CM2010

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
243
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

It was on its highest setting and did have a fresh set of batteries in,will contact the dealer who i purchased it from.
 

tab665

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,212
Location
north carolina
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

i own an m30 and a m20. something is very wrong there. can you post a pic of your m30's other output levels? im thinking it might be stuck in medium. check to see if you notice any pwm. if you can then its stuck on medium or low. see if you can post more pictures where the beamshots are at the same exposure level, in the m30 beamshot you can tell all the porch and street lights are considerably dimmer than in the m20 beamshot. or maybe you can do a side by side outdoor beamshot.
 

CM2010

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
243
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Tried my M30 with the extension tube fitted with 2 freshly charged 18650`s and it seems to be a hell of alot brighter,will try some new cr123`s when i get some next week.

Ive added a pic to my opening post.
 

HIDblue

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
872
Location
California
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Tried my M30 with the extension tube fitted with 2 freshly charged 18650`s and it seems to be a hell of alot brighter,will try some new cr123`s when i get some next week.

Ive added a pic to my opening post.

Now, that's better. :thumbsup:
 

KarstGhost

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
276
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Will 18650's always make it brighter than 4 fresh CR123 primaries?
 

WadeF

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
4,181
Location
Perkasie, PA
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Glad you got it working properly. Look at all that bright spill! :)
 

Noctis

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
526
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

I could be very wrong here, but the M30 uses an MC-E LED right? And that thing more or less doesn't even turn on with low voltage. Were you using a single 18650 with the first try?
 

sjmack

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
161
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Much better. That beamshot is pretty darn impressive.
 

Jack Reacher

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Melbourne Australia
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Yep, that M30 spill beam (with 2x18650s) is beautiful, and more importantly, very usable at that range. Is it a smooth or OP reflector?

—Jack. :)
 

Ace12

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
321
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

Are the runtimes listed on Olights website for the M30 using 3x123A or 4x123A?
 

tab665

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
1,212
Location
north carolina
Re: Not impressed with my Olight M30

if you were using the 3xcr123 set up then that could explain. the M30 has TERRIBLE regulation in that battery configuration. selfbuilt did a review a while back and the output basicially does a rather steep drop after its turned on until the batteries die. i recall many people stating that they were going to get some 18500 cells to obtain better regulation while not having to use the extension tube.
 
Top