BuddTX
Flashlight Enthusiast
I am not Episcopalian or gay, but I am close to this issue, as my Dad went to a very conservative Episcopal Church, and the Diocese appointed a Gay priest to be ***'t pastor there, and my family was very involved with that church, so this is an interesting topic for me. It very much devided the church, but did, in some ways strengthen the church, and helped a lot of very conservitive folks and liberal folks develop a "disagree yet love each other" atmosphere.
A very brief backround, and others out there might know more than me so feel free to correct me . . .
The Episcopal Church is deeply divided over the issue of the acceptance of openly gay people, both lay people (no joke) and clergy. It is so divided, that there has been talk of a split in the Church.
The intersting thing is that the Rev. V. Gene Robinson, the priest up for nomination for the Bishop of New Hampshire, has a (quoting from the press) "His partner of 13 years, Mark Andrew".
I was always told that an Episcopialian Priest could be openly gay if he practiced Celebacy, and was not involved in a relationship.
I am Catholic, so for those of you that don't know, a Catholic Priest is always Celebate (Please no jokes about alter boys, that is a horrible situation, and the cover up is also horrendious!), whereas an Episcopialian Priest is allowed to marry, and is often expected to marry and have a family.
So this potential Bishop has a "domestic partner". I thought that was not allowed in the Episcopialian Church for openly gay clergy. In other words, you could be an ordaned Priest, and declare that you are Gay, as long as you are Celebate.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
By posting this, I mean no disrecpect to any person or group, or anyone's lifestyle. While I consider myself very conservative, I also believe that we have Freedom of Choice in America, and every American should be able to choose their own individual "Pursuit of Happiness".
What is interesting here, is that a mainstream Christian Church, that DOES tell people what to do, based on God's law, has traditionally said that homosexuality is against God's law. The same mainstream Churches have also said that we are all sinners, and that God loves every one unconditionally. It is almost as the two statements diametricly opose one another.
On a similar issue, as a Catholic, I have always found it interesting that in catholic Communion, often a HUGE majority of worshipers attending a service will "pass" on Communion. I understand the reasons why, but I found it to not represent what I was taught and believe, and that is God Loves Everybody, and why would the Catholic Church tell people that they cannot "recieve God".
If anyone finds this thread offensive I will delete it, no need to flame. As I said, I respect other people's choices.
Any comments?
A very brief backround, and others out there might know more than me so feel free to correct me . . .
The Episcopal Church is deeply divided over the issue of the acceptance of openly gay people, both lay people (no joke) and clergy. It is so divided, that there has been talk of a split in the Church.
The intersting thing is that the Rev. V. Gene Robinson, the priest up for nomination for the Bishop of New Hampshire, has a (quoting from the press) "His partner of 13 years, Mark Andrew".
I was always told that an Episcopialian Priest could be openly gay if he practiced Celebacy, and was not involved in a relationship.
I am Catholic, so for those of you that don't know, a Catholic Priest is always Celebate (Please no jokes about alter boys, that is a horrible situation, and the cover up is also horrendious!), whereas an Episcopialian Priest is allowed to marry, and is often expected to marry and have a family.
So this potential Bishop has a "domestic partner". I thought that was not allowed in the Episcopialian Church for openly gay clergy. In other words, you could be an ordaned Priest, and declare that you are Gay, as long as you are Celebate.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
By posting this, I mean no disrecpect to any person or group, or anyone's lifestyle. While I consider myself very conservative, I also believe that we have Freedom of Choice in America, and every American should be able to choose their own individual "Pursuit of Happiness".
What is interesting here, is that a mainstream Christian Church, that DOES tell people what to do, based on God's law, has traditionally said that homosexuality is against God's law. The same mainstream Churches have also said that we are all sinners, and that God loves every one unconditionally. It is almost as the two statements diametricly opose one another.
On a similar issue, as a Catholic, I have always found it interesting that in catholic Communion, often a HUGE majority of worshipers attending a service will "pass" on Communion. I understand the reasons why, but I found it to not represent what I was taught and believe, and that is God Loves Everybody, and why would the Catholic Church tell people that they cannot "recieve God".
If anyone finds this thread offensive I will delete it, no need to flame. As I said, I respect other people's choices.
Any comments?