Gransee
Flashlight Enthusiast
We announced the LS4 awhile back and everything was cool. But then SF came out with a product with a similiar sounding name (L4). I am sure they had no desire to confuse things. Both SF and Arc have sequential luxeon series. LS1, LS2, LS3, LS4 vs KL1, KL2, KL3, L1, L4, etc. So it was bound to happen.
But with a similiar sounding name, people may confuse the two products. The L4 is simply using the bigger/brighter concept of so many flashlights before. The LS4 however is a new direction for flashlights with it's force multiplying microprocessor. Micros have been used before in flashlights (HDS Action Light, Technology Associates Eternalight) but never to their full utilitarian potential. This will be the first light to use a digital tempurature sensor for example. One of the most exiting benefits of a micro is the increased power supply efficiency. This sets the LS4 apart.
It would be a shame then if they were thought to be the same light. "Gee Arc's light is dimmer and more expensive. What advantage is that?".
I think because the addition of the uC (microprocessor controler), this new light it a radical departure from previous designs. As such, a new series should be started.
I would like to keep the "LS" moniker if possible. This is a badge of honor for our products because we were the first flashlight manufacturer to sell a Luxeon Star (LS) flashlight. I would also like to keep the name short, ideally 3 characters or less, so it is easier to reference.
What do you think? Should we ignore the potential for confusion? Should we start a new series? Remember we have a 3 watt version planned (LS5) and it will be part of this new series.
Cast your vote:
Thank you for your time.
Peter
But with a similiar sounding name, people may confuse the two products. The L4 is simply using the bigger/brighter concept of so many flashlights before. The LS4 however is a new direction for flashlights with it's force multiplying microprocessor. Micros have been used before in flashlights (HDS Action Light, Technology Associates Eternalight) but never to their full utilitarian potential. This will be the first light to use a digital tempurature sensor for example. One of the most exiting benefits of a micro is the increased power supply efficiency. This sets the LS4 apart.
It would be a shame then if they were thought to be the same light. "Gee Arc's light is dimmer and more expensive. What advantage is that?".
I think because the addition of the uC (microprocessor controler), this new light it a radical departure from previous designs. As such, a new series should be started.
I would like to keep the "LS" moniker if possible. This is a badge of honor for our products because we were the first flashlight manufacturer to sell a Luxeon Star (LS) flashlight. I would also like to keep the name short, ideally 3 characters or less, so it is easier to reference.
What do you think? Should we ignore the potential for confusion? Should we start a new series? Remember we have a 3 watt version planned (LS5) and it will be part of this new series.
Cast your vote:
Thank you for your time.
Peter