Thats very interesting... To those that missed the initial conversation about this, or who don't know about trademarks, you don't get to pick and choose.
Their trademark isn't on the hollow tube, it's on circumferential lettering. Just because the rest of it might look different, it is still important.
If you don't defend a trademark, you loose it. That simple.
Course, the ARC folks must have known about this, so there must be a good reason why they didn't bring this up. But the more MAG allows their trademark to be diminished, the more difficult it would be for them to actually defend it in court...
As I said, I'm going to enjoy watching what happens with this /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
[EDIT] yea, we did say we weren't going to talk about this so much anymore didn't we.
But it's my understanding that it was a trademark and not a patent issue. Trademarks are different, you have to defend them as far as I know or they loose their value.