Best tail cap for Surefire E-series?

gunfighter

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
119
Location
West Michigan
Gents,

Maybe I'm just confused, but while reviewing bigchelis's lumen list (great info BTW) he seems to suggest that he lost a significant amount of output when using an E-series clicky.

That caught my attention, because my new planned build is using a Surefire E1B body, Z68 tail cap, and a Malkoff VME head with M31 drop-in. I plan to run a single CR123A.

Should I consider using another tail cap instead of the Z68? If so, what is a better choice?

Thank you
 

TMedina

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
1,737
To the best of my knowledge, I've never lost a significant amount of output because I used a SF clicky.

But I love the Z68 - the flare on the tail makes it easier to grip the light and you have a tail-stand option.

Find a traffic wand sized for the E1B and you'll have the perfect flashaholic's dining candle. :grin2:

-Trevor
 

gunfighter

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
119
Location
West Michigan
I've been reading a bit more, and I believe I'm okay with the Z68. I plan to run a Malkoff M31, which doesn't draw nearly as many amps as some of the other high-powered customs I've read about.

Thanks.
 

kramer5150

Flashaholic
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
6,328
Location
Palo Alto, CA
bingo... bc tests many high current draw lights that push the limits of many switches. The E series click switches should be fine with lower current draw.
 

nekomane

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2003
Messages
1,259
Location
Tokyo
Nothing to do with resistance, but a non-clickie Z52 may be more reliable.
Just another option. I'm happy with the clicky (Z57) so far.
 

Chrontius

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,150
Location
Orlando, FL
I actually find myself prefering my Z57 over my Z52 many times. It may just be the age of the switch boot on the Z52, but they're not getting any younger.
 
Top