The Pila 9V LA is rated at 130 Lumen and 50 minutes run time on either a pair of 1200 mAh 18650 Li-Ion cells or of 1400 mAh CR123's. I'm guessing that the Pila 9V current is around 1300 mA as compared to the 1100 of the P90.
This compares to the 105 Lumen P90's 1 hour run time on CR123's.
Curiously, Wolf-eyes / Pila advertise using their 80 Lu 3.7 V LA in a 2 cell SF. This works, but the wide OD of the outer top part of the reflector causes a jam fit into the SF body and keeps the bezel from screwing down the final 1/8 ".
Pila doesn't advertise the 9V light for SF, and I assumed it was because the LA was even wider. Last night I found out, to my surprise, that the Pila 9V LA fits perfectly into a 9V SF. It also runs well off of either 3 * 123 or 2 * 17650 Li-Ions.
I like the wide Pila 9V beam much more than the P90. The P91 beam is brighter,more even, and effectively as wide but it also has a much shorter run time, is more expensive, and would require a 4 * 123 cell length with with Li-Ions to run a pair of 17670's.
I don't think I'll ever order another p90.
This compares to the 105 Lumen P90's 1 hour run time on CR123's.
Curiously, Wolf-eyes / Pila advertise using their 80 Lu 3.7 V LA in a 2 cell SF. This works, but the wide OD of the outer top part of the reflector causes a jam fit into the SF body and keeps the bezel from screwing down the final 1/8 ".
Pila doesn't advertise the 9V light for SF, and I assumed it was because the LA was even wider. Last night I found out, to my surprise, that the Pila 9V LA fits perfectly into a 9V SF. It also runs well off of either 3 * 123 or 2 * 17650 Li-Ions.
I like the wide Pila 9V beam much more than the P90. The P91 beam is brighter,more even, and effectively as wide but it also has a much shorter run time, is more expensive, and would require a 4 * 123 cell length with with Li-Ions to run a pair of 17670's.
I don't think I'll ever order another p90.