HDS Systems        
Results 1 to 30 of 241

Thread: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Grinser2 Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

    Warning: Pic heavy, as usual.




    Zebralight has gone through a couple of iterations of the 1xAA forward-projecting SC50 model flashlight – although most of these have been relatively minor circuit tweaks.

    For this review, I have on hand a late model neutral-white XP-E emitter SC50w from just before the introduction of the SC50w+ version. Not much has changed - the “+” version has a new secondary Hi mode on 14500 instead of strobe (107 Lumen), and slightly brighter primary Med mode (36 instead of 33 Lumens) on both standard AA and 14500. But otherwise, the build is identical.

    I also have a soon-to-be-released new SC51 cool-white sample. The SC51 uses the newer XP-G emitter (R4 output bin), but is otherwise identical in build to the SC50 line. The circuit seems similar to the SC50w, although strobe is no longer present at all (i.e. the secondary Hi mode is available on both standard AA and 14500).

    SC50w+ Specifications (taken from Zebralight):
    • LED: Cree XP-E Neutral White (color temperature 4000-4300 K)
    • User Selectable Modes: 3 (High, Medium and Low). Each mode can be configured to one of the two sub-levels.
    • Light output values are out the front (OTF) Lumens.
    • AA (alkaline/NiMH/lithium, runtimes based on Sanyo 2700mAh NiMH)
    • High: 107 Lm (2.3 hrs) or 2Hz strobe
    • Medium: 36 Lm (10.5 hrs) or 18 Lm (21.4 hrs)
    • Low: 4.4 Lm (4 days) or 0.6 Lm (22 days)
    • 14500: Outputs same as above, except the the SC50w+ features a 169 Lm max output and a 107 Lm output as the secondary High mode (i.e. instead of 2 Hz strobe, which is still present on regular AA).
    • Battery: One AA size alkaline, 1.5V lithium primary, NiMH rechargeable, or 3.7v 14500 Li-ion rechargeable. Batteries are not included in the package.
    • Parasitic Current Drain: 5.6uA, equivalent to 55 years of battery life.
    • Beam Type: 76° spill beam spread, 8.6° (3 feet at 20 feet) hot spot
    • Dimensions: Diameter: 0.85 inch (22 mm), Length: 3.15 inch (80 mm)
    • Weight: 1.3 oz (36.5 gram) with clip, without battery or headband
    • Electronic soft-touch switch, with a 200,000 cycle operating life
    • Smart user interface provides fast and easy access to all brightness levels
    • Precision machined casing from premium grade Alcoa aluminum bar stock
    • Proprietary heat sinking design bonds the LED metal core board directly to the uni-body aluminum casing, providing unblocked thermal paths to over 94% of the surface area.
    • Durable natural hard anodized finish (Type III Class I)
    • SCHOTT ultra clear lens with anti-reflection coatings on both sides
    • Bezel down clip (pre-installed)
    • Can be used as a headlamp with the included headband (clip can remain installed when the light is on the headband)
    • Orange peel textured reflector
    • Anti-roll and tail-stand capable
    • Battery power can be locked out by slightly unscrewing the tailcap to prevent unwanted activations or parasitic drain
    • Waterproof to IPX8
    • Accessories in the package: One black silicone holder with headband, two o-rings
    • Estimated MSRP: $59

    SC51 Specifications (where different from above):
    • LED: Cree XP-G Cool White (color temperature 6100-6500 K)
    • User Selectable Modes: 3 (High, Medium and Low). Each mode can be configured to one of the two sub-levels.
    • Light Output
    • High: H1 200 Lm (0.9 hrs) or H2 140 Lm (2 hrs)
    • Medium: M1 30 Lm (12 hrs) or M2 8 Lm (39 hrs)
    • Low: L1 2.5 Lm (3 days) or L2 0.2 Lm (16 days)
    • Light output are out the front (OTF) values. Runtime tests are done using Sanyo 2000mAh Eneloop AA batteries.
    • Voltages: 0.7V - 2.5V
    • Battery: One 1.5V AA (NiMH, lithium or alkaline). 14500 Li-ion batteries are not supported. Batteries are not included in the package.
    • Parasitic Drain: Negligible (equivalent to 16 years)
    • Beam Type: 80° spill beam spread, 11° (3.8 feet at 20 feet) hot spot
    • Waterproof to IPX8 (1 meter 30 minutes)
    • Estimated MSRP: $64

    Given that the lights and packaging look identical, I will only show one set in the pics here - except for the emitter shots, of course, where I will show both samples.



    For both lights, included in the simple but firm cardboard box was the light with removable clip (attached), extra o-rings, and a one-page instruction sheet. The SC50w also came with the classic Zebralight headband with soft plastic light holder (shown above) – but the SC51 sample was lacking this accessory.



    From left to right: Duracell alkaline, Zebralight SC51, SC50w, 4Sevens Quark Mini AA, Quark AA, NiteCore D10-SP, Fenix LD10-R4, ITP SA1

    SC50w: Weight: 37.8g (no battery), Width (bezel) 22.4mm, (tailcap) 21.4mm, Length 80.5mm
    SC51: Weight: 37.4g (no battery), Width (bezel) 22.4mm, (tailcap) 21.4mm, Length 80.5mm

    As you can see, the SC50/51 series is quite tiny.

    The overall dimensions of the SC51 are exactly the same as the earlier SC50/SC50+ series – it’s only the emitter that appears different (XP-G on the SC51 instead of XP-E on the earlier models). SC50w first, followed by SC51:




    The SC51 sample I have uses a XP-G emitter with R4 output bin. The SC50w doesn’t specify an output bin for the XP-E emitter, but I understand from Zebralight that the Neutral white version currently comes from a 5B4 tint bin.

    Reflectors look identical, and are medium textured (medium orange peel), and a reasonable depth for this size light.





    The lights have flat-bottomed tailcaps and electronic control switches on their heads. The switches are covered with textured boot covers, and are easy to access. Feel of the switches are good for this type, with a lightly audible click as you make contact. Note that electronic switches are not like traditional mechanical clickies – think more like the buttons on your DVD player, flat-screen monitor, etc.

    Tailcap threads are anodized, allowing for tailcap lockout. This is important on all lights with electronic switches, since there is always some parasitic stand-by current drain to allow the switch to function. Scroll down for a discussion in this case.

    The lights can both tailstand and headstand.

    The lights come with a removable metal pocket clip, held in place by two regular Phillips head screws.

    Fit and finish on both of my samples are excellent. I really like the color – the SC51 is slightly darker than my SC50w specimen, but that is just natural anodizing lot variability. Either way, I personally quite like dark green-grey color. In both cases, the tailcaps are well-matched to the bodies. The overall effect is very similar to a number of Nitecore, JetBeam and SUNWAYLED lights. I would consider the anodizing of Zebralights to be in the same category as those makers.

    One interesting feature – absolutely no identifying or warning labels of any sort on either light. Kind of a refreshing change, to be honest.

    There is little ridge detail or knurling, so I recommend you keep the clip on these lights. The heatsinking fins around the head do provide some additional grip, though.

    Beamshots

    Sorry for the quality of the beamshots – I’ve recently moved, and haven’t had a chance to set up a proper beamshot closet yet. What you are looking at below is un-primed drywall, with a range of spakle/sanding marks.

    All lights are on Max, ~0.5m from a white wall on Sanyo Eneloop. The camera was set to automatic white balance, and the SC50w doesn’t look that warm in real life.






    Although the un-primed drywall makes things a bit messy, you can see that the SC50/SC51 have a wider beam profile than the Fenix LD10-R4. Throw on the Zebralights are reasonable for this class.

    For an explanation and discussion of the various tints – including outdoor shots comparing how they look – please see my 4Sevens Mini Tint Comparison - Warm, Neutral, Cool White . The SC50w is slightly warmer than the Mini Neutral used in that comparison, but you’ll get the general idea.

    User Interface

    The Zebralights have a fairly unique user interface. While it may sound a little complex when first described, it is actually quite easy to use. Both the SC51 and SC50w function the same way, but there have been a few mode changes over time on the SC series.

    On/off and mode switching is controlled by the electronic clicky switch. There are 6 possible output modes on either light, arranged in two sets of 3. Each output set is Lo – Med – Hi. There are two possible outputs at each level, commonly referred to as 1 or 2 (e.g. Lo1, Lo2, Med1, Med2, Hi1, Hi2). The light has independent mode memory to recall your preference at each of the Lo, Med, Hi levels.

    The SC50 series features a 2Hz strobe mode as the secondary Hi, and lacks a memory feature at this level (i.e. Hi1 constant output is the only memorized option). The updated SC50+ series features a 107 Lumen secondary Hi on 14500 only, as well a slightly brighter primary Med mode on both standard AA batteries (NiMH, alkaline, L91) and 14500.

    The SC51 has dispensed with the strobe mode altogether, and has a constant output secondary Hi mode on all batteries. Mode memory has been re-enabled at this level (i.e. you can select and memorize either Hi1 or Hi2)

    From Off, a quick click turns on the light to Hi1 (SC50/SC50+) or your preferred Hi (SC51) instantly. Click quickly again to cycle from Hi to Med, and Low. You need to perform these clicks rapidly if you want to switch modes this way (i.e. from Off, single-click is Hi, double-click is Med, triple-click is Lo). After about a second or so of being On, a quick click will simply turn the light off.

    Alternatively, from Off, a slightly longer press and hold (i.e. >0.5 sec) turns on the light to your preferred Lo mode.

    To advance from one mode to the next while the light is On, press and hold to cycle through Lo, Med and Hi, repeatedly (you can do this directly from Off too). Release the switch to select the level. As before, a quick click turns off the light.

    Double click at any level to toggle between the two sub-levels for that level (i.e. 1 or 2). The light will memorize your choice and return to it next time you cycle or turn on at this level (except for Strobe on the SC50/SC50+). The memory even lasts through battery changes.

    And that’s it – it is really very simple. Once you get used to the timings, you can basically have the light do anything you want, with your preferred Lo and Hi being the most directly accessible from Off.

    Strobe/PWM:

    SC50w:



    The SC50/SC50+ strobe mode is a refreshingly slow “signaling” strobe of 2Hz. For once, we don’t have to put up with nauseating “tacticool” strobes on a 1xAA light.



    On the SC30/H31 series lights I reviewed previously, PWM was in the visible range on the secondary output modes (Lo2, Med2, Hi2) – typically 120-900 Hz. I am happy to report my SC50w sample only has measurable PWM on the Med2 level – and at an extremely high 3.7 kHz.

    SC51:




    However, I am sad to report that the SC51 has reverted to visible PWM on Lo2 and Med2 levels. Worse than that, the Lo2 mode is at a very visible 69 Hz (the Med2 is not as bad at 437 Hz).

    This might have something to do with moving to the XP-G emitter, but I am sad to see a return to the low PWM freq – and one that is about half as fast as the older SC30/H31.

    Parasitic Stanby Drain:

    On the SC30/H31 lights, parasitic drain was typically sufficient to drain a fully charged cell in 1 year (for RCR) or 3 years (for primary CR123A). So how do these 1xAA brethren fare? The following were measured using a DMM:

    SC50w: 7.4 uA on 14500, 2.3 uA on Eneloop NiMH
    SC51: 41.8 uA on 14500, 14.2 uA on Eneloop NiMH

    Assuming a standard 900mAh protected 14500, and a 2000mAh Eneloop NiMH, these currents would translate into:

    SC50w: 13.9 years on 14500, 99.3 years on Eneloop
    SC51: 2.5 years on 14500, 16.1 years on Eneloop

    Clearly, the SC50w drain is absolutely nothing to worry about. While the drain is higher on the SC51 it is still very good – certainly better than the earlier SC30 series.

    Testing Method: All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, a la Quickbeam's flashlight reviews method. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan.

    Throw values were taken at 1 meter for all lights shown below.

    Throw/Output Summary Chart:





    And no, those output numbers for the SC51 on Eneloop are not misprints!

    Scroll down for a discussion ...

    Output/Runtime Comparison













    I don’t know the output bin of the SC50w, but its performance is quite good for a neutral-white XP-E emitter. It certainly matches or exceeds most R2-equipped cool white lights in my collection. No surprises – all modes tested did very well on all batteries

    So how do you top that? Enter the SC51 - performance on standard batteries (Eneloop NiMH, alkalkine, L91) is simply outstanding.

    Zebralight informed me that the SC51 was optimized for standard batteries, but I wasn’t expecting this kind of performance. Output/runtime efficiency clearly outperforms even the Fenix LD10-R4 – in some cases by as much as 50% or more! Max output is also noticeably higher than the Fenix (which was itself head-and-shoulders above the other lights in my collection). The Eneloop, L91 and alkaline graphs all tell the story pretty well!

    So has the SC51 skimped on 14500 performance? Not all – in fact, I would say it performs as well as any other light given the R4 output bin.

    Something else to note – the regulation pattern (on all batteries) is excellent – perfectly flat in all cases except max output.

    Potential Issues

    The lights use PWM for the lower outputs of the Med/Lo settings. On the SC50w, I was unable to detect the frequency on Lo, and found a virtually undetectable 3.7 kHz on Med. However, the SC51 has a very noticeable 69 Hz on the lower Lo, and a more reasonable 437 Hz on the lower Med.

    Although my SC50w took all my AW protected 14500 (including the older flat-top ones), my SC51 wouldn’t light up on any of them initially. I had to use a small magnet spacer on the positive contact pole of the battery for it to work. I don’t know if this is natural variability, or if there’s been a circuit change on the SC51. I note there is a quick flash when first making battery contact on the SC51, something that I do not see on the SC50w.

    A parasitic standby current is needed for the electronic switch, but the levels are not a concern for either light (i.e. several years, to decades, of battery life). And in any case, the light can be easily locked-out by a twist of the tailcap.

    UPDATE January 7, 2011: Having EDCed the SC50w for several months now, I can tell you of another issue - the light easily turns on if something presses against the switch in your holster/pocket. You need to lock the light out at the tailcap to prevent this. Otherwise, you may notice some heat coming from your pants - the light usually comes on in Max with a quick press. I've also had a few cases of finding it on Lo/Med, with a nearly depleted battery after being on for hours.

    Preliminary Observations

    To start, I found that the SC50w performed admirably – and consistently - on all battery sources. Although Zebralight doesn’t provide an output bin for its XP-E emitter, I’d estimate somewhere around a R2 output level compared to other lights I’ve tested. I'm not generally a huge fan of neutral-warm tints, but I like the 5B4 tint bin of the SC50w.

    Some of the small issues that detracted from the 1xCR123A-based H31/SC30 Zebralights I recently reviewed have been fixed. The standby current has been reduced to negligible levels (i.e. 14/99 years before draining a 14500/Eneloop). The PWM has been raised to virtually undetectable levels (i.e. 3.7 kHz on lower Med, unmeasurable on lower Lo).

    Basically, the SC50w is great little 1xAA light. I've been EDCing it for the last month, and have been happy with its performance.

    But it is also on the verge of being replaced by the SC51 – sporting the new XP-G R4. More than that, the SC51’s circuit has been tweaked for outstanding standard battery performance (i.e. Eneloop, NiMH, alklakine, L91 lithium).

    I’m frankly at a loss … I don’t understand how Zebralight has managed to pull off this sort of performance. The SC51 blows away every XP-E light in my collection – both in terms of output/runtime efficeincy, and max output. For goodness sakes, it's max output on Eneloop is higher than most modern 1xAA lights on 14500!

    And 14500 performance is still fine on the SC51 – while not as outstanding as the standard battery runtimes, it is consistent with a R4 output bin. Note though that I typically needed to use a small magnet spacer for the protected 14500s to make contact in the SC51 (something I didn’t need on the SC50w). Not sure why - the lights look to be the same build.

    If this sort of performance is the wave of the future, I’m looking forward to more XP-G based 1xAA lights!
    ----

    UPDATE 9/11/2010: I've gotten some updates from Zebralight on the issues identified for the SC51 in the review:
    • The H51 and SC51 share the same circuit (a buck-boost, that has been heavily optimized since the original H50)
    • My engineering sample had a lower PWM, but the final shipping version should be close to those found in the SC30/H31 (i.e. twice what I found on the SC51).
    • ZL explains that they use lower freq PWM in the Low2 level for improved circuit efficiency. They claim to be able to filter out the visible PWM with the capacitor in the output stage, even though the PWM may still be detectable by oscilloscope.
    • The positive contacts used in the SC51 are simply from a new batch, which presumably explains the heightened sensitivity to flat tops. Nothing is changed in terms of positive polarity detection.
    • ZL confirmed that parasitic drain is lower on the AA-series lights, compared to their other offerings. They say they will try to implement this feature on the SC30/SC60/H31 lights in the future.
    • One minor difference between the SC50 and SC51 that I didn't note - the threading is a bit thicker now - 1.25mm pitch. In addition to the same circuit, the SC51 and H51 also use the same thread, and tailcap.

    ----

    SC50w was provided by GoingGear.com for review. SC51 was provided by Zebralight for review.
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 03-10-2011 at 09:16 AM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's MID-RANGE MYSTERY BOX Sale
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  2. #2
    *Flashaholic* gunga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    7,943

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    I can't wait for the neutral XP-G Zebralights. I hope they have them on the way, I have about 3 Zebralights in mind but am waiting for neutral XP-G. Thanks for the wonderful review!


  3. #3
    Flashaholic* tre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Northern IL USA
    Posts
    1,222

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Wow! I am amazed how bright that thing is in the ceiling bounce test. That is brighter than most single Cr123a lights. That just went to the top of my list. I love my SC50+ and my SC30. I think I would love an SC51 even more. My SC50+ is going to be a gift for somebody when the SC51 comes out. amazing light. Simply amazing output/run time on an AA.
    Thanks for another great review.

  4. #4
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    150

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Great review selfbuilt!

    I have the original SC50 - EDCing that for about 4 months now and it has been a great EDC. As for the SC51, I am especially impressed with the Nimh performance on high. No need to mess around with a 14500. The beam from the XP-G is definitely bigger and more usable for EDC applications. The low frequency PWM is a little disappointing, since I use the low-low is one of my more popular modes. I hope Zebralight fixes that in that production release or is this it?.

  5. #5
    Flashaholic chenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    237

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    I'm definitely in for a SC51w when it will be available! It's a little dream-come-true light.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Quote Originally Posted by gunga View Post
    I can't wait for the neutral XP-G Zebralights.
    Quote Originally Posted by tre View Post
    Wow! I am amazed how bright that thing is in the ceiling bounce test. That is brighter than most single Cr123a lights.
    Quote Originally Posted by chenko View Post
    I'm definitely in for a SC51w when it will be available! It's a little dream-come-true light.
    Yeah, the SC51 performance is surprising! If they come out with a neutral version of the XP-G, I am sure all the members of this forum would be all over it.

    Quote Originally Posted by LiteShow View Post
    I have the original SC50 - EDCing that for about 4 months now and it has been a great EDC. As for the SC51, I am especially impressed with the Nimh performance on high. No need to mess around with a 14500. The beam from the XP-G is definitely bigger and more usable for EDC applications. The low frequency PWM is a little disappointing, since I use the low-low is one of my more popular modes. I hope Zebralight fixes that in that production release or is this it?.
    Good points - I have actually been EDCing the SC50w for over a month now (on 14500), and find I quite like it.

    Honestly, I'm not sure if I'll switch to SC51 for EDC. Even though it is brighter on eneloop than the SC50w on 14500 (!), I've grown quite fond of the neutral-white emitter and lack of visible PWM. I am quite sensitive to PWM, and will do almost anything to avoid it.

    Dunno if there's any chance of ZL revising that before the release - I doubt it, since the SC30/H31 series also had visible PWM on the lower level. It is just the SC50w that seems to live in a "sweet spot" of undetectable PWM, for some reason.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's MID-RANGE MYSTERY BOX Sale
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Good stuff!!! Thanks for the review. Please review the H51F also when it comes out.
    Last edited by davidt1; 09-08-2010 at 02:48 PM.
    EDC: ZL H52w, H502w

    The only useful tool is the one you have with you when you need it.

  8. #8
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Posts
    507

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    I’m frankly at a loss … I don’t understand how Zebralight has managed to pull off this sort of performance. The SC51 blows away every XP-E light in my collection – both in terms of output/runtime efficeincy, and max output. For goodness sakes, it's max output on Eneloop is higher than most modern 1xAA lights on 14500!
    The SC51 is certainly a leap forward in technology.

    Thank you, Selfbuilt, for the excellent review. I appreciate your candor and it was interesting to read your comments. I could feel your sense of amazement with what Zebralight has pulled off.

    I want one...bad.

  9. #9
    Flashaholic* Lite_me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Northern OH
    Posts
    1,992

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    I've been waiting for this review. Thanks selfbuilt! Great job as always.
    "People don't plan to fail, they fail to plan."

  10. #10

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post



    I can't tell- where the clip attaches, are those two protrusions & ring permanently connected to the body, or is it a separate part that removes once you unscrew the clip? Just curious if removing the clip would render a more streamlined body underneath, like their headlamps.

    Also, you mentioned locking it out. WOuld it be possible with this type of button to just leave it on a given setting, then turning it off & on by only twisting the tailcap? Or it will be twist tailcap, push button every time if you lock it out? Either way it's great you can lock it out. And I'm glad I waited for this one instead of letting their sc60 force me into using a battery type I wasn't excited about. Thanks for another great review as always S.B.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Thanks for the support everyone.

    Quote Originally Posted by AlphaZen View Post
    The SC51 is certainly a leap forward in technology. ... I could feel your sense of amazement with what Zebralight has pulled off.
    When you review a lot of lights as I do, you are always on the lookout for something new. Of course, that doesn't mean its useful or functional for everyone - the Icon Rogue comes to mind. I enjoyed delving into the exact behaviour of the circuit, although my apparent enthusiasm for discovery wasn't shared by everyone (I recall taking some crap in some quarters for "wasting" my time on it, for example ).

    The SC51 is different - what impresses me in this case (and what isn't obvious from a surface examination) is the performance of the circuit on standard batteries. The graphs speak for themselves - I've never seen anything quite like it. The perfectly flat regulation on the secondary Hi mode is particularly impressive, given that the level is higher than most lights Max output (i.e. look at the alkaline or L91 graphs). Of course, while regulation patterns are interesting to me, what matters to the end user is really the other tidbit to be gleaned in the graphs - it runs more than twice as long as the competition for the same (or more) output!

    Although I don't plan on doing the lower output mode runtimes (they just take too long, and results can be more variable), it certainly seems like the SC51 is the light to recommend on standard batteries.

    Quote Originally Posted by leon2245 View Post
    I can't tell- where the clip attaches, are those two protrusions & ring permanently connected to the body, or is it a separate part that removes once you unscrew the clip? Just curious if removing the clip would render a more streamlined body underneath, like their headlamps.
    No, the attachment point is permanent - it remains if you remove the clip.

    Also, you mentioned locking it out. WOuld it be possible with this type of button to just leave it on a given setting, then turning it off & on by only twisting the tailcap?
    No, locking out the tailcap turns off the light - you would needed to press the switch again to re-activate once the tailcap is re-tightened. But of course, your selection of relative outputs for each level is maintained, and it's pretty easy to jump to the level you want from off (i.e. Hi or Lo directly from off, Med is just an extra long press-hold from off).

    Quote Originally Posted by LiteShow View Post
    The beam from the XP-G is definitely bigger and more usable for EDC applications.
    A thought occurs to me here - both my lightbox and ceiling bounce measures are similarly affected by beam pattern. Lights with narrow spill beams focused for throw tend to report lower than lights with wider and more diffuse spill. So it's possible the tables and runtime graphs are artificially giving the SC51 a slight output advantage compared to some lights. But this effect likely isn't huge - and after all, a number of the other lights also have wider dispersion beams.
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 09-09-2010 at 07:48 AM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's MID-RANGE MYSTERY BOX Sale
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  12. #12
    Flashaholic* orbital's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Great Lakes
    Posts
    2,361

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    +

    Looks like Zebralight has set the bar for single AA lights,
    simple & efficient,...just like it should be
    {the PWM does need to be increased}}}

    thanks again selfbuilt..
    Last edited by orbital; 09-09-2010 at 08:51 AM. Reason: add

  13. #13
    Flashaholic* tandem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    874

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Oh, so, close... I've been waiting to hear more opinions on the SC50 and now a soon to be released model hits most of my hot buttons... great runtimes on AA's... the utility and form factor suit me to a T. But... but... I'm really disappointed to learn about the SC51's low frequency PWM on the lower modes indicated. I'd prefer it didn't employ pwm at all (and still deliver the same performance) but would certainly park my PWM predjudice if the frequency was higher and undetectable to at least the human eye.

    (Detectable by the human eye or not, I don't like PWM as a rule as it frequently interfers with some bike computers)

    I am also sensitive to low frequency light oscillation - back in the day of CRT's it seemed like I was the only one in the office bothered by 60Hz sync on monitors and I'd go around and fix everyone's device. PWM also interferes with some bike computers.

    Still I'm very interested in the smaller form factor and love the side clicky for regular users and would probably buy three of these in a heartbeat (my wife wants a headlamp, I'd like to get her something like this that does double duty as well as a couple or three more for my boys and myself) if not for the low freq. pwm.

    Hopefully a newer release addresses this and I'll be shopping then.
    Last edited by tandem; 09-09-2010 at 08:20 PM. Reason: note on why I don't like pwm in general

  14. #14
    Flashaholic TwinBlade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Waukesha, WI
    Posts
    302

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    A great review as usual SB, but I cannot find a ZL SC51 anywhere...

    There are all sorts of SC50+, no SC51's that I can find. Are you sure you didn't mean H51?

  15. #15

    Default

    This might be the wrong thread, but I got some enlightenment from comparing the specs of models on their site. They all have the same runtime on the current reg levels. What was more interesting was the c was more efficient on the low level PWM levels and the Cree versions better on the high end. This was consistent with what I read in other threads I read about the emitters.

    Feel free to laugh, I still have a lot to learn.

  16. #16
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    437

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Nothing to laugh about. I think we all are still learning.
    Deus Vult

  17. #17

    Default Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    FYI, a SC52 is supposedly on its way for me to review. So I will be doing a full review of that model once it is here (with comparison to the SC51).
    I'll throw in an unusual request, but of course will understand if it is not considered.

    ZL has spec'd the SC52 to be equal to or better than both the FourSevens Quark AA2-X (QP2A-X) and the EagleTac D25C Clicky XML across most of the modes, which interestingly, lining-up quite closely between the three lights. Since the single cell XML versions of the Quark AA and D25A have not been previously tested by yourself, perhaps the tested 3v versions would be worthy of inclusion on the comparison charts, particularly given the closely matching manufacturer specification claims.

    Without any representation from XML Quark AA or D25As, then it seems the only other XML/1xAA/sub-lumen competitor light in the comparison will be the ThruNite Neutron 1A.

    Just trying to get a more complete comparison, without being unfair (once again, given the matching spec sheets).
    Last edited by reppans; 01-27-2013 at 11:05 AM.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Quote Originally Posted by reppans View Post
    Without any representation from XML Quark AA or D25As, then it seems the only other XML/1xAA/sub-lumen competitor light in the comparison will be the ThruNite Neutron 1A.
    It's a good point, I do have a limited number of 1xAA comparators in the XM-L class. I can certainly include a couple of tables with some of the recent XM-L based 2xAA and 1xCR123A/RCR lights, should make for some interesting comparisons.

    I'm just pulling everything together for the review now anyway, should have it up in a couple of days.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's MID-RANGE MYSTERY BOX Sale
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  19. #19

    Default Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    ....I can certainly include a couple of tables with some of the recent XM-L based 2xAA and 1xCR123A/RCR lights, should make for some interesting comparisons.
    Awesome...and on your Output/Runtime graphs (please?), considering the SC52 is competing at the same 280 lms/0.9 hrs mark (and, well, nearly every other mode too) against the best of the best.

    Looking forward to your review.... as usual :-)
    Last edited by reppans; 01-27-2013 at 03:20 PM.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOT

    Quote Originally Posted by reppans View Post
    Awesome...and on your Output/Runtime graphs (please?), considering the SC52 is competing at the same 280 lms/0.9 hrs mark (and, well, nearly every other mode too) against the best of the best.
    That's a little more work to pull together, given that runtime data is categorized by battery type (i.e., I have to transfer the data and re-generate each curve in a different template). I suppose I could do it for direct comparisons to the 2xAA lights, as it would at least be comparable battery chemistries (for alkaline and NiMH).

    Man, this is shaping up to be a long review ...
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's MID-RANGE MYSTERY BOX Sale
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  21. #21

    Default Zebralight SC51 (XP-G R4) & SC50w (XP-E Neutral) 1xAA Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

    Sorry Selfbuilt... please don't go out of your way for this request. I just thought I might have been interesting with just these three lights given they are (or probably will be) the brightest three lights in the 1xAA, 2xAA and 1xCR123 class that you've tested, and interestingly, with nearly identical specifications across the board.

    Do whatever you think is fit and beneficial for your reader base. Thanks for the consideration.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •