I like the Quark Mini, but

magpullin

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
43
Location
Texas
I would like it more with a sst-50 led and using a rcr123. They say do not
use the rcr on the current Mini, but I know alot of people do. I think this would be a killer light with these options, and maxing out the power of the
rcr unfortunately whoever answered my e-mail there said they have no plans to offer a sst-50 led. :shakehead
Matthew
 

AnAppleSnail

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
4,200
Location
South Hill, VA
I would like it more with a sst-50 led and using a rcr123. They say do not
use the rcr on the current Mini, but I know alot of people do. I think this would be a killer light with these options, and maxing out the power of the
rcr unfortunately whoever answered my e-mail there said they have no plans to offer a sst-50 led. :shakehead
Matthew

It's not their target market. The boost electronics in the MiNi (AA or 123) will go into direct-drive when Vbatt > Vf. That said, there's plenty of options for small, RCR-powered direct drive SST50 lights. There's no good way to heatsink a DD-SST50 in that package, so (without expensive thermal-shutdown electronics) normal people would break the flashlight if they used it.

The MiNi series is meant to be small in size and cost. It's about the smallest production light in each battery class, and not too far above the lowest price in each category.

Edit: The XP-G costs about $8 singly. The SST-90 costs as much as $60!
 
Last edited:

Joe Talmadge

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
2,200
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
If an XP-G can't be heat-sinked well enough in that little package to run more than a minute or two on LiIon, i can't imagine an SST would run more than a few seconds, assuming you could push the battery even harder (with an IMR, say)... I don't think it could be an SST-50 and still be a MiNi, could it?
 

AnAppleSnail

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
4,200
Location
South Hill, VA
If an XP-G can't be heat-sinked well enough in that little package to run more than a minute or two on LiIon, i can't imagine an SST would run more than a few seconds, assuming you could push the battery even harder (with an IMR, say)... I don't think it could be an SST-50 and still be a MiNi, could it?

The nearest things (size-wise) I can find are larger and cost about $150. And using 'high' for very long will probably burn your fingerprints off.
 

paulr

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
10,832
A few seconds is often enough for long-distance spotting. An IMR-powered SST50 light the size of a Quark Mini that could run at 500+ lumens for 10 seconds with a 1 minute cooldown would be... interesting. It would have to have built-in thermal monitoring and automatic stepdown/shutoff.
 

magpullin

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
43
Location
Texas
Well I was thinking about it because the Lummi Raw was offered with
a sst-50 led putting out 250 lumens, so I was thinking why not the Mini???
 

LEDninja

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
4,896
Location
Hamilton Canada
The Quark Mini will put out 250+ lumens*** if you put an RCR in it. No need for an SST-50 upgrade. Don't blame us if the RCR explodes and destroys your hand. (That is why Joe Talmadge suggested IMR batteries which can handle the current. At least use an AW protected 16340.)

The problem as many others have mentioned is heat.
I have an Elektrolumens EDC-P7. The LED is in the same power class as the SST-50. It is 5.5" long, 1.5"Ø much bigger than a Quark Mini. It got too hot to hold in 5 minutes. I was on a 1+ hour hike. Luckily I had my 3C Mag with me.
I donated an L0D CE. I supplied a 10440 with it. The recipient decided the light with 10440 runs too hot and went back to a regular AAA.

-

***The Preon has essentially the same LED and circuit as the Quark Mini. Running a 10440 in a Preon is very similar to using a 16340 (RCR) in a Mini.
Note a 10440 in a Preon is running at 4C, double the 2C safe limit of Li-on batteries. The 16340/RCR123A in a Mini is running at 2C or at the danger point. An AW IMR16340 is rated to be safe up to 8C so should be safer from over-current danger. But it does not have low voltage protection. The AW protected 16340 provides both over-current and low voltage protection.
Jay R got over 280 lumens with 3 different Preons with 10440.
https://www.candlepowerforums.com/posts/3387177&postcount=1
bigchelis got 326.2 and 327.7 initial lumens from 2 different Preons with 10440.
https://www.candlepowerforums.com/posts/3387389&postcount=3
You should get similar results running a RCR123A in a Mini.
Note how the heavy drain is affecting the batteries. bigchelis got 326.2 and 327.7 initial lumens but by the 3 minute mark is down to 222.3 and 218.5 lumens. While a 16340 has double the capacity of a 10440, you still won't be able to maintain the initial lumens for long.
 
Top