EagleTac M3C4 SST-50 409 lumens ?
- Thread starter Luminater
- Start date
Help Support Candle Power Flashlight Forum
jgraham15
Enlightened
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 230
Wow that's just a little bit off from the info on eagletac's website :shakehead
"Luminus SST-50 W65S WJ LED: 20/70/215/470/1000 MAX lumen at the LED"
"The EagleTac M3C4 is a compact 11 Watt high output LED flashlight offering 1000 Bulb lumen with 800 O.T.F. lumen at turbo mode (SST-50 and triple XP-G R5 models) and a maximum of 100+ hours regulated runtime at the 15 lumen low output mode."
:shrug:
"Luminus SST-50 W65S WJ LED: 20/70/215/470/1000 MAX lumen at the LED"
"The EagleTac M3C4 is a compact 11 Watt high output LED flashlight offering 1000 Bulb lumen with 800 O.T.F. lumen at turbo mode (SST-50 and triple XP-G R5 models) and a maximum of 100+ hours regulated runtime at the 15 lumen low output mode."
:shrug:
Last edited:
Dioni
Flashlight Enthusiast
shipwreck
Enlightened
Yea, that's weird...
Looks like my M2XC4 is better...
Looks like my M2XC4 is better...
Dioni
Flashlight Enthusiast
Less than 10min o turbo using CR123a!!! :duh2:
PS: And the donut artifact in the beam? Its the most awful I've ever seen! :sick2:
PS: And the donut artifact in the beam? Its the most awful I've ever seen! :sick2:
Last edited:
Saint_Dogbert
Enlightened
6-lumen 'moonlight' mode? Nice try.
shipwreck
Enlightened
Yea, something seems strange...
dhouseng
Newly Enlightened
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
- Messages
- 156
Good luck to Eagletac.
tre
Flashlight Enthusiast
I've been thinking for a while that the company was going down hill but they still made great lights. It seems the lights are now an issue too. Hopefully, this was just a one off mistake. If I were EagleTac, I would test the lights to make sure they were up to par before I sent them out. Nope, not them. Too much work
bigchelis
Flashlight Enthusiast
I been testing SST-50 lights from Neofad, Olight, and a couple others and they all do relatively 400~sub 600 OTF at 1000 emitter lumens.
I'm not surprised, now what they could do is use copper, a SSR-50, and bolt down the star with screws to help with heat transfer.
Of course a bunch of other things too.
bigC
I'm not surprised, now what they could do is use copper, a SSR-50, and bolt down the star with screws to help with heat transfer.
Of course a bunch of other things too.
bigC
bigchelis
Flashlight Enthusiast
I prefer this too, but the SSR-50 can be made simple in a DD format and offer some throw to boot.
Tripple XP-G's are more efficient, run cooler, and offfer more OTF lumens. The only thing you loose is throw.
bigC
Dioni
Flashlight Enthusiast
HIDblue
Enlightened
That's both surprising and disappointing. :shakehead I held off on buying an M2C4 waiting for the latest and greatest M3C4, but it certainly does pay off waiting for several reviews before pulling the trigger. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for the triple XP-G version to perform better than the 409 lumens OTF of the SST-50.
Kind of weird though, my P20C2 Mark II is one helluva light and light-reviews rated it at 300+ lumens OTF. Could it be a defective unit? QC issue?
Kind of weird though, my P20C2 Mark II is one helluva light and light-reviews rated it at 300+ lumens OTF. Could it be a defective unit? QC issue?
shipwreck
Enlightened
I almost held off on my M2XC4 - as I was warned that Eagletac was about to come out with something new. I'm glad I pulled the trigger...
The M2XC4 supply seems to have dried up too - I guess its been discontinued. I'm glad I got mine...
The M2XC4 supply seems to have dried up too - I guess its been discontinued. I'm glad I got mine...
initially the m3 supposed to be releases end of june, and i was informed that eagletac received new manufacturing equipment and it was delayed. Finally the it was announced this month. So it took them more than 2 months to finally release it. I thought that the delay was due to them testing the product but maybe i was wrong, if the problem applied to all the m3c4 sst-50 instead of this sample tested by light-reviews.
Similar threads
