Sorry for the mistaken intent when I said that about the Lumen output of the XM-L vs. the XP-G and the XP-E,
I was referring to the throw potential of the various LEDs and not the Lumen output. Yes the XM Lumen
output is far greater than the XP series, but because of the increased area of the die and the lower surface
brightness, the XP-E should be equal or greater than the XM at suggested drive levels of 1 Amp vs.
2 Amps. At 2.5 Amps drive with the XM the throw should be slightly better. That would be using standard
available optics in the typical flashlight configuration. We will have to see what the actual throw performance
between the LEDs will be once we have had an opportunity to test them. Until then, ?
As for using the MC-E or the XR in a personal flashlight build-up, why not. As for commercial new flashlights,
no way. That would be the same as designing a new flashlight around the Philips K2, been there, last year
at about this same time.
The question of the MC-E v. the P7, both use the same die from Cree. The difference is that in a flashlight,
the P7 can be driven a 0.5 Amp harder for more output because of it's greater heat-sink area. The down side is
the shorter phosphor life vs the MC-E since the P7 does not use the latest phosphor from Nichia. Some of the
Seoul P4 LEDs do, but not all.
Curt