SST-90 Thrower - Really!

saltytri

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
531
5392437986_a654733291_z.jpg




We all know that the SST-90 doesn't throw. Sure, that's true if you put it in a P60 drop-in but put it in a 2.5" shiny reflector and the story has a very different ending. This light was made for a gentleman who wanted a very bright light more than he wanted a small light.



5391837807_209dd188b7_z.jpg




Good run time was required so three 18650s are run in parallel in a very nice battery holder made by mdocod.



5392425276_5270982802_z.jpg




The switch is a 10A Judco. One of the challenges when trying to get high current is to eliminate all the small resistances that can pile up along the circuit with disappointing results. When driven by my bench supply, the isolated light engine pulls 6.88A. Tail cap current measured with a Fluke multimeter and short, heavy leads is 6.81A, so there aren't any bottlenecks in the circuit.



5391820815_345f05a550_z.jpg




5392424332_cd6409290f_z.jpg




The light engine is a monster. The draw on High is 6.8A at the tail cap so heat management was a priority. The emitter is mounted on a copper slug that is 1.5" in diameter, an inch deep, and pressed into the aluminum body. Its not light! The driver is a ShiningBeam 3-level with three additional 7135 boards.



5391823157_50c7ffcde3_z.jpg




5391823593_e9a5afda43_z.jpg




After running untouched on a desk for a half hour, the light is easily holdable. The light engine and head get much warmer than the body tube, which was a goal of the design. The reflector is held in the head by a very substantial retaining ring that seats against the front surface of the light engine, thereby moving heat forward. There is less contact between the light engine and the body tube, which stays cooler as a result. The new owner wants to be able to run the light on High for extended periods, not just bursts. To do this at 25W or so, there's no substitute for plenty of mass, efficient thermal paths, and surface area.



5391822105_23ff13821f_z.jpg




5391822583_4d9a5288fa_z.jpg




5391821617_aa7ea06da2_z.jpg




The glass is 1/8 thick borosilicate. The emitter is a 5700 WN rated at 1000 to 1200 lumens at 3.15V, which interpolates to 2100 to 2500 lumens at 6.8V



5392437822_727233c955_z.jpg






5391837973_da0e359065_z.jpg




The 3D Mag is shown for size comparison.



5391837647_42f7a5974c_z.jpg




Here are some beam shots.



5391819637_cd5d53076f_z.jpg




The farthest tree is 250 feet away.



5392420402_9f95595c5e_z.jpg




Same for the one below - 250 feet.



5391825229_684843af68_z.jpg




On the left is a Malkoff M60 for comparison.



5392420686_8218ec4a83_z.jpg




With the camera lens stopped down, the very small and intense central spot can be seen.



5391821065_56b60fbe26_z.jpg




The%203D%20Mag%20is%20shown%20for%20size%20comparison.
5392437686_828a4e2ff0_z.jpg
5392437686_828a4e2ff0_z.jpg
 
Last edited:

simplec6

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
278
Can't believe no one commented on this beast back in March 2011.

This is excellent.
 

Epsilon

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
463
Location
Netherlands
I think someone did, but they are lost in the crash. This light deserves a new set of comments though. Very very nice work. That reflector suits the stt90 well, very nice :).
 

CaptainBrock

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
44
That is truly great, but OW! MY EYES hurt. If you can't do black ano or powder coat, I recommend a can of flat black spray paint from the ACE Hardware!
 

Rat

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
1,124
Location
Australia
What a perfect beam love it. Workmanship is outstanding.
Thanks for bringing this back from the dead so we could all see it.

cheers
 

CaptainBrock

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
44
saltytri; said:
The emitter is a 5700 WN rated at 1000 to 1200 lumens at 3.15V, which interpolates to 2100 to 2500 lumens at 6.8V
The correct term is "extrapolate" in this case, and you should know you can't do that with a non-linear response curve that tapers off with increasingly voltage. Besides, aren't you using a current regulator? And you would certainly never achieve 6.8V at the emitter as it would be fried long before that.
Anyway very awesome job on this piece!
 
Top