Cypher_Aod
Enlightened
So, yesterday afternoon i finally received my Gorgeous SureFire L6 Lumamax from F250XLT on CPFMP.
after a brief inspection (which might have also been called a drooling session) I whipped three brand new Panasonic CR123A's from my box'o'batts and fired this baby up.
What i was met with was a combination of disappointment and elation. you see, the KL6 head which the L6 Lumamax is equipped with has an extremely antiquated Luxeon V emitter, four Luxeon-I emitters in a single package. The resulting LED was capable, at the time, of some quite heroic feats of illumination but compared to todays LED wizardry, looks like something that barely escaped the stone age.
as a result, the light-output from this (rather expensive) torch was not especially impressive, and the tint was not spectacular either.
When your EDC is a Cree XP-G 90-CRI driven at 1.4A for more than 220 lumens of output, 100 lumens of slightly green light isn't very exciting. This did not surprise me, in fact, i was expecting this to be the case.
However, what I did see brought pure elation to my heart; the beam-pattern. the wide and extremely deep reflector results in a beam pattern that has the capability to be a mighty throw monster.
Allow me to explain. As has become common knowledge, LED throw is directly linked to the size of the emissive surface, the "size of the thing that the light comes from", the bigger it is, the more floody a beam you'll get.
Now, the Luxeon-V LED has a HUGE emissive surface due to the four dies, in fact, the emissive surface is larger than that of a Cree XM-L from a side-by-side comparison.
And yet, this torch produces a hotspot dramatically smaller than that of my tightest-throwing torch, a TIR-equipped XR-E throwmonster.
I had initially intended to mod this head with an XM-L, but i'm now leaning towards putting an XP-G in there for Über-throw and longer runtimes. frankly, 800 lumens of throw isn't really that much more use than 450 lumens of super-throw.
::BEAMSHOTS::
All photos were at ISO200, F/3.5 and 1/125s, so brightnesses are relative and comparable. AWB was on so tints are not. Camera was on a tripod, lights were affixed to top of camera in the same place every time.
This is my Romisen RC-F4, in person it's my throwiest light, edging out the TIR-throwmonster by just a smidge.
This is the TIR throwmonster:
This is an XR-E R2 P60 dropin from Dealextreme:
This is the L6 Lumamax:
This is an XM-L Floodmonster with Scotch-Tape on the lens:
As you can see, while dimmer the L6 clearly has a far smaller hotspot than the XR-E lights. i'm very exited by the prospects of modding this light... i just wish it had better heatsinking.
after a brief inspection (which might have also been called a drooling session) I whipped three brand new Panasonic CR123A's from my box'o'batts and fired this baby up.
What i was met with was a combination of disappointment and elation. you see, the KL6 head which the L6 Lumamax is equipped with has an extremely antiquated Luxeon V emitter, four Luxeon-I emitters in a single package. The resulting LED was capable, at the time, of some quite heroic feats of illumination but compared to todays LED wizardry, looks like something that barely escaped the stone age.
as a result, the light-output from this (rather expensive) torch was not especially impressive, and the tint was not spectacular either.
When your EDC is a Cree XP-G 90-CRI driven at 1.4A for more than 220 lumens of output, 100 lumens of slightly green light isn't very exciting. This did not surprise me, in fact, i was expecting this to be the case.
However, what I did see brought pure elation to my heart; the beam-pattern. the wide and extremely deep reflector results in a beam pattern that has the capability to be a mighty throw monster.
Allow me to explain. As has become common knowledge, LED throw is directly linked to the size of the emissive surface, the "size of the thing that the light comes from", the bigger it is, the more floody a beam you'll get.
Now, the Luxeon-V LED has a HUGE emissive surface due to the four dies, in fact, the emissive surface is larger than that of a Cree XM-L from a side-by-side comparison.
And yet, this torch produces a hotspot dramatically smaller than that of my tightest-throwing torch, a TIR-equipped XR-E throwmonster.
I had initially intended to mod this head with an XM-L, but i'm now leaning towards putting an XP-G in there for Über-throw and longer runtimes. frankly, 800 lumens of throw isn't really that much more use than 450 lumens of super-throw.
::BEAMSHOTS::
All photos were at ISO200, F/3.5 and 1/125s, so brightnesses are relative and comparable. AWB was on so tints are not. Camera was on a tripod, lights were affixed to top of camera in the same place every time.
This is my Romisen RC-F4, in person it's my throwiest light, edging out the TIR-throwmonster by just a smidge.
This is the TIR throwmonster:
This is an XR-E R2 P60 dropin from Dealextreme:
This is the L6 Lumamax:
This is an XM-L Floodmonster with Scotch-Tape on the lens:
As you can see, while dimmer the L6 clearly has a far smaller hotspot than the XR-E lights. i'm very exited by the prospects of modding this light... i just wish it had better heatsinking.