Well, the MQR06 is a fine charger, I'm sure.
But it has a fixed rate. That is 1680mA with 1 cell in it, 1120mA with 2 cells, and 560mA with 4 cells. There is no way to alter that.
The C9000 has adjustable charge rate, anywhere from 100mA to 2000mA in 100mA steps for each of the 4 channels, they are all completely independent... The charge rate doesn't depend on the other channels being occupied or not.
The MQR06 has no discharge or condition function.
The C9000 has the option of cycling cells multiple times, a completely selectable refresh and analyse function, or a break in function which emulates the standard method for determining a cell's capacity.
The C9000 has a selectable discharge rate also, anywhere from 100mA to 1000mA in 100mA increments.
On the other hand, whilst being simpler and not having the full customization of the C9000, the C801D has the following advantages:
8 independent Bays, so the full 8 AA cells that the TK41 takes can be recharged all at one time.
Each bay can run at up to 2000mA per bay, all at once.
There is a discharge/recharge refresh function.
From a supplier such as hamradio.com , the C9000 can be bought for $40 or the C801D for $50, so in my opinion, for the extra benefits, either would be worth the spend.
In the long term, the ability to perform a deep discharge/refresh cycle could improve the longevity of the cells and their ongoing capacity.
On the other hand, eneloops are rated for as much as 1500 cycles, so even without refresh cycles, I'm sure that with just the MQR06 or similar they'll do fine for many years to come.
So whatever suits the individual's needs I suppose. All three are good in their own ways. :thumbsup:
Edit: These digital dingus reviews are useful and informative for
the C801D and
the C9000.