Some data points on the Lighthound 1xAAA XPG-R5 flashlight. After simple tests, I understand the limitations better. I have limited data on low output - no interest. I rarely use the lowest output of any light I currently have. For that matter, I prefer lights that initially turn on in high mode - if there is a required sequence. The Zebralight UI is a better system than a strict sequence. BTW, This light has a soft-start which is especially noticeable.
All cells freshly charged
Output:
- The output on LiIon/ICR on high is very impressive, well over 200 lumens by ceiling bounce comparison with several lights. It makes a 10440 in an LD01 on high look faded. However the runtime on high is <5 minutes due to the heavy current load which slopes down the output quickly
- The output on LiIon/ICR on medium is above the output of an LD01 running a NiMH on high - noticeable difference, but not overwhelming.
- The output on Imedion NiMH on high is about the same as the medium output of an LD01 using 10440.
- The output on Imedion NiMH on high is well above that of an LD01 on high using an Imedion NiMH.
Runtime:
- new AW ICR 10440: 5+ min on high. ~30 min on medium.
- older Ultrafire 10440: maybe a minute or two on high - the output drops so fast that it is difficult to determine the crossover to an equivalent medium output. 20 min on medium. These Ultrafire 10440 cells still perform a standard duty in my LD01, although I have tossed a couple already based on too-short runtime.
- older Imedion NiMH 800mah: 11 min on high. 30-35 min on medium.
Current draw:
- Imedion NiMH 800mah: 2.2A-2.4A on high. 0.75A on med. 0.06A on low.
- AW ICR 10440: 1.6A on high. 0.5A on med. 0.018A on low
Beam pattern:
- about 2 LD01 spots could fit inside of the spot of the Lighthound 1xAAA XPG-R5 light.
Beam color: good, not cold or blue. warmer than an LD01
Shortest analysis: This light will not displace the LD01 on my keychain.
Slightly longer analysis: The light circuitry may tolerate the voltage from a 10440, but in my view it was designed to compete/beat the LD01-type lights when 1xAAA NiMH cells are employed. This light certainly demonstrates the limitations of a single AAA cell in any chemistry. Maybe the R3 version of this light would be more usable?
For a broader comparison: The Lighthound 1xAA XM-L T6 light on a 14500 cell provides an output well beyond other 1xAA lights. Frankly rather good for the same price of $25.