After comparing my SWM T20CS and V20C
Ive found such thing
First, V20C suppose to be floodier than T20CS due to size of reflector
And T20CS allows user to use turbo mode with 658lm while V20C maxed at 438lm
Now lets go the pic
T20CS box mentioned 278m @ 658lm while V20C says 300m @ 438lm
And they claimed that 2 tests are with same SWM's standard, FL1 standard stated on box
This is bizzare due to the spec
T20CS suppose to out-throw V20C with its over 10k lux while V20C is aprox. 6k lux
Btw, suppose Lux varies as inverse of distance square, i.e.
Lux <>< K/m^2 ,k is non-zero
Assume T20CS has 0.25 lux @ 278m
then i should have (lux@1m / 0.25)= (278/1)^2
Isnt it? Result in 20k lux@1m
Any thoughts?
Ive found such thing
First, V20C suppose to be floodier than T20CS due to size of reflector
And T20CS allows user to use turbo mode with 658lm while V20C maxed at 438lm
Now lets go the pic
T20CS box mentioned 278m @ 658lm while V20C says 300m @ 438lm
And they claimed that 2 tests are with same SWM's standard, FL1 standard stated on box
This is bizzare due to the spec
T20CS suppose to out-throw V20C with its over 10k lux while V20C is aprox. 6k lux
Btw, suppose Lux varies as inverse of distance square, i.e.
Lux <>< K/m^2 ,k is non-zero
Assume T20CS has 0.25 lux @ 278m
then i should have (lux@1m / 0.25)= (278/1)^2
Isnt it? Result in 20k lux@1m
Any thoughts?
Last edited: