How far can a flashlight be seen?

Kitchen Panda

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
260
Location
Winnipeg
So I was wondering how far a flashlight beam could be seen in good conditions. The ANSI FL1 standard rates working distance to 0.25 lux, the illumination produced by the full moon.

Astronomers have been measuring brightness of objects for centuries, so it's not hard to find a table showing the moon has "magnitude" -12.5 (1 lux corresponds to magnitude -14, and 5 magnitude steps correspond to a 100-fold change in illumination; the dimmest stars visible by someone with excellent vision and really dark sky is magnitude +6).

Also according to the table, the brightest stars in the night sky are magnitude 0. So, that's 12.5 magnitude steps, cranking the algebra, that means you can easily see an object that is providing 99,000 times less light than the full moon. The illumination drops off as the square of the distance and the square root of 99,000 is 315, nearly.

So, all this rigamarole says that if you take the ANSI FL1 working distance and multiply it by 315, you'll have a range at which the light will appear about as bright as the brightest stars.

According to that, the TK70 should be visible up to 130 miles! There's probably some additional atmospheric factors that crop up over such great distances, but it's kind of cool to imagine this. That doesn't quite reach the International Space Station.


Bill
( But if I'm forced down somewhere in Northern Ontario at night, you can bet if I can see *your* lights, I'll be flashing all of mine in your direction!)
 

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
The catch is always atmosphere and divergence - I know that on a perfectly clear night, my 35W HID will visibly light an object half a mile away, but on dusty or moist nights, that figure is literally halved. And I've brought up the idea of pointing a 1W Wicked Arctic laser directly at the International Space Station; it was calculated that by the time the beam reached the Station, it would be many hundreds of feet across, far too diverted to see at all.
 

gcbryan

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
2,473
Location
Seattle,WA
Stars and flashlights are two different things. You can see magnitude +6 (as mentioned with good eyes and dark conditions) but you can't see a +6 magnitude nebula because of the way magnitude is figured. It takes into account area so unless your flashlight has a pinpoint light similar to a star your conclusions aren't going to apply.

Maybe I've missed something however :)
 
Last edited:

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
but you can't see a +6 magnitude nebula because of the way magnitude is figured. It takes into account area

Nope, it's "apparent magnitude" meaning how bright it appears to the eye as-is. And you'd have to be somewhere extremely remote to see a +6 object; from out in the desert I can just make out the galactic plane, and I can't make out anything over roughly +4.5..
 

gcbryan

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
2,473
Location
Seattle,WA
Nope, it's "apparent magnitude" meaning how bright it appears to the eye as-is. And you'd have to be somewhere extremely remote to see a +6 object; from out in the desert I can just make out the galactic plane, and I can't make out anything over roughly +4.5..

I'm not sure what "nope" is in answer to but I get apparent magnitude but what I what I'm talking about is how magnitude (apparent or absolute) is applied to something that is not a star. A +6 magnitude nebula is like a +6 star only if you "squeezed" the nebula to a point like a star.

However, I agree the atmosphere is what limits the kind of distance the OP is talking about
Sure +6 is under perfect conditions but I'm not arguing whether the standard is +6 or +5 or whatever. When I live (in the city) I can barely see +3.

I may be wrong or missing some point but that point isn't related to absolute vs apparent magnitude or whether anyone other than someone in the desert with perfect eyes can see it +6 naked eye.
 
Last edited:

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
what I'm talking about is how magnitude (apparent or absolute) is applied to something that is not a star. A +6 magnitude nebula is like a +6 star only if you "squeezed" the nebula to a point like a star.

I'm saying "nope" to that - the basic apparent magnitude system is rather crude and predates Ancient Rome; the idea is how bright the thing you're looking at appears to you, and that's it. It has since been refined to exclude the effect of atmosphere, but is otherwise still the same. The star Vega is roughly 0, the Moon is -13, the Sun is -27, etc. The math used to reach these numbers is a bit complex, but the overall concept is just the amount of light reaching your eye.
 
Last edited:

gcbryan

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
2,473
Location
Seattle,WA
I'm saying "nope" to that - the basic apparent magnitude system is rather crude and predates Ancient Rome; the idea is how bright the thing you're looking at appears to you, and that's it. It has since been refined to exclude the effect of atmosphere, but is otherwise still the same. The star Vega is roughly 0, the Moon is -13, the Sun is -27, etc. The math used to reach these numbers is a bit complex, but the overall concept is just the amount of light reaching your eye.

Let me rephrase it. In a dark environment (rare for many people) you can see a +6 nebula just as you can a +6 star. You either get it all in a bright point (from the star) or you get it dimmer (more spread out) from a larger nebula but in aggregate your eye gets the same amount of light.

The light pollution washes out the larger, dimmer nebula so it's larger size is no help visually. The concentrated point of the star does get through.

In real world conditions with light pollution it is common to be able to see, for instance, a +3 star and not be able to see a +3 large nebula since the light pollution makes it impossible to see the +3 nebula but maybe not regarding the +3 star.

From my location I can see the star Albireo and I cannot see the Andromeda Galaxy (naked eye) even though they are both roughtly +3 relative mag.
 
Last edited:

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
You're over-complicating it; the apparent brightness idea predates telescopes by nearly two millennia, so there was no concept of galaxies or nebula, just the brightness of the object compared to other objects. If a galaxy appears to be as bright as another star in the sky, those two objects will have the same magnitude number, that's it. You have an exactly equal chance to see either object in a perfectly even unlit sky (which is essentially impossible unless you're well out to sea; some portion of the sky is always going to have some light pollution.)
 

Swedpat

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,448
Location
Boden, Sweden
Interesting matter! Astronomy is another of my big interests, and I have thought a lot about how stars can bee seen from such a huge distances. I am pretty sure a candle light can be seen by the naked eye from at least a few miles distance at dark conditions, so a flashlight has to be visible from much longer distance...
Actually I have planned to do some tests about it.
 

Norm

Retired Administrator
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
9,512
Location
Australia
I am pretty sure a candle light can be seen by the naked eye from at least a few miles distance at dark conditions, so a flashlight has to be visible from much longer distance...
Actually I have planned to do some tests about it.

Has any one bothered to check my link above, post #3?

Norm
 

yifu

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
713
Location
Australia
I can't find the original discussion thread about that, but I still wonder how a DEFT would do in that application; I picture a kit where the flashlight has a headset jack on it..
Yep, a DEFT would be very useful, especially in the wild for signalling etc.
 

AnAppleSnail

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
4,200
Location
South Hill, VA
This would be at night, bouncing light off clouds..
150 miles is well over the horizon, which is impressive for light-based communication.

Broadly speaking, from height in meters, the distance to the horizon in km is : 3.57 * sqrt(h)
in feet and miles, 1.323 * sqrt(h). These are from wikipedia: Horizon

Quite a bit better than a signal mirror without using the Rocky Mountains as a tower...
 

jirik_cz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
1,605
Location
europe
Some radioamateurs reported on our local forum, that they've tried TK70 on 49 kilometres (30 miles) distance and it was easily visible. They've also tried TK45 but it wasn't visible at that distance.
 

bobbagum

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
74
Location
Thailand
I've always wondered how the size of reflector and/or lighting element affects the visibility, ie: a cluster of dim LEDs Vs one bright emitter, eventhough the power of multiple lights can be considered additive, but I feels the bigger but dimmer might be more visible further away.
 
Top