Submitted for consideration in the Reviews sub-forum.
If you've been around CPF for any length of time, you've heard of Lighthound. You've probably ordered from them. They released their line of AAA and AA lights earlier this year, which are rebranded Balder lights. The one I'm reviewing today is the AA Tactical XPG R3. It sells for $19.99 at LightHound and can be used with either a single AA or 14500 battery. First, I'll get the technical stuff out of the way.
The AA Tactical has Mil-spec Type III hard anodizing, and is black. The light has a light orange peel reflector, which is attached to the head. The head unscrews, and the reflector is held in with the familiar two circlip holes. The lens is glass. The LED itself isn't attached to the head; it's held in (glue?) the body. Mine came perfectly centered. As mentioned, the LED is an XPG R3. The tailcap is a forward clicky and cycles the three modes with a light tap. First for high (100%), then medium (30%), then low (1%). The light doesn't have a memory and always comes on in high. The AA Tactical comes with a removable pocket clip, instaled bezel-down. Mine is stainless steel. There's no lanyard attachment point on the light, but the pocket clip will accept one. The clip is nice; not too loose and not too tight.
LightHound lists runtime as 1.2 hours on high with a 14500. I don't have any desire to test that, since the light gets really hot on high with a 14500 after about 45 seconds. On an alkaline or NiMH, there's no problem. I don't detect PWM at any level with any battery, but I'm not sensitive to it.
As far as output, LightHound lists the following on high: 120 lumens on an alkaline AA and 180 lumens on a 14500. I've done a real-world break-down of the output below. For how I got these numbers, see the bottom of this post.
Advertised
Alkaline, High: 120 lumens
Alkaline, Medium: 36 lumens
Alkaline, Low: 1.2 lumen
14500, High: 180 lumens
14500, Medium: 54 lumens
14500, Low: 1.8 lumen
Tested
Fresh Duracell alkaline battery...
High: 126 lumens
Medium: 39 lumens
Low: 1.8 lumen
Freshly-charged TrustFire 14500...
High: 197 lumens
Medium: 61 lumens
Low: 2.5 lumens
The description says that with certain 14500 batteries, a 1.6mm spacer might be required. I didn't find this to be the case, but I needed one for my Duracell alkaline. I simply stretched the spring in the tailcap and tried until I got it. Everything is good now. In general, I really like this light. It has a good mix of flood and throw, and the low mode stays low an a 14500. I hope to get beamshots up tonight. In short, this is the best $45 light I've spent $20 on. Thanks for reading
http://www.lighthound.com/Lighthound-AA-Tactical-Flashlight-Cree-XPG-R3-LED_p_3974.html
How Did I Get the Lumen Numbers?
A buddy of mine goes by the name Richard. Richard works in a lab. When you see ANSI (American National Standards Institute) rating on a light, you might be seeing Richard's lab tests. He has a lot of cool equipment. Every now and then, I see Richard and have him test some lights for me. The numbers he gives me are for real, with me giving him no input beforehand on what the lumen rating is advertised at. I like Richard.
If you've been around CPF for any length of time, you've heard of Lighthound. You've probably ordered from them. They released their line of AAA and AA lights earlier this year, which are rebranded Balder lights. The one I'm reviewing today is the AA Tactical XPG R3. It sells for $19.99 at LightHound and can be used with either a single AA or 14500 battery. First, I'll get the technical stuff out of the way.
The AA Tactical has Mil-spec Type III hard anodizing, and is black. The light has a light orange peel reflector, which is attached to the head. The head unscrews, and the reflector is held in with the familiar two circlip holes. The lens is glass. The LED itself isn't attached to the head; it's held in (glue?) the body. Mine came perfectly centered. As mentioned, the LED is an XPG R3. The tailcap is a forward clicky and cycles the three modes with a light tap. First for high (100%), then medium (30%), then low (1%). The light doesn't have a memory and always comes on in high. The AA Tactical comes with a removable pocket clip, instaled bezel-down. Mine is stainless steel. There's no lanyard attachment point on the light, but the pocket clip will accept one. The clip is nice; not too loose and not too tight.
LightHound lists runtime as 1.2 hours on high with a 14500. I don't have any desire to test that, since the light gets really hot on high with a 14500 after about 45 seconds. On an alkaline or NiMH, there's no problem. I don't detect PWM at any level with any battery, but I'm not sensitive to it.
As far as output, LightHound lists the following on high: 120 lumens on an alkaline AA and 180 lumens on a 14500. I've done a real-world break-down of the output below. For how I got these numbers, see the bottom of this post.
Advertised
Alkaline, High: 120 lumens
Alkaline, Medium: 36 lumens
Alkaline, Low: 1.2 lumen
14500, High: 180 lumens
14500, Medium: 54 lumens
14500, Low: 1.8 lumen
Tested
Fresh Duracell alkaline battery...
High: 126 lumens
Medium: 39 lumens
Low: 1.8 lumen
Freshly-charged TrustFire 14500...
High: 197 lumens
Medium: 61 lumens
Low: 2.5 lumens
The description says that with certain 14500 batteries, a 1.6mm spacer might be required. I didn't find this to be the case, but I needed one for my Duracell alkaline. I simply stretched the spring in the tailcap and tried until I got it. Everything is good now. In general, I really like this light. It has a good mix of flood and throw, and the low mode stays low an a 14500. I hope to get beamshots up tonight. In short, this is the best $45 light I've spent $20 on. Thanks for reading
http://www.lighthound.com/Lighthound-AA-Tactical-Flashlight-Cree-XPG-R3-LED_p_3974.html
How Did I Get the Lumen Numbers?
A buddy of mine goes by the name Richard. Richard works in a lab. When you see ANSI (American National Standards Institute) rating on a light, you might be seeing Richard's lab tests. He has a lot of cool equipment. Every now and then, I see Richard and have him test some lights for me. The numbers he gives me are for real, with me giving him no input beforehand on what the lumen rating is advertised at. I like Richard.
Last edited: