I just got a light that for the first time in while really knocked my socks off (Fire Foxes FF3). So, I thought I'd round-up a few of the brighter lights of mine and my flashaholic friends (parkschr, Brewdog2001) and see how it compared to them relative to total lumens. Stated or estimated lumens really doesn't do it for me, I really like to see it with my eyes. The problem is, our eyes quickly adjust to the dim or bright light, and you don't truly get the true impact of the output difference. The best way I have found to see the difference in total output is using a locked exposure and do some ceiling bounce shots.
So, I set up a shoot last night using the below locked settings in manual mode on my Panasonic DMC-ZS7 camera:
The lights:
Unfortunately my current brightest LED is a 3.5A XM-L by nailbender, so nothing above 1,000 to include in these....
So here are the results (ordered by perceived dimmest to brightest)...
:devil:
:devil::devil:
:devil::devil::devil:
:devil::devil::devil::devil:
Surprises from this this shootout:
So, I set up a shoot last night using the below locked settings in manual mode on my Panasonic DMC-ZS7 camera:
- ISO: 100
- Exposure Time: 1 Second
- White Balance: Daylight
- F-stop: f/4
- Max aperture: 3.44
The lights:
Unfortunately my current brightest LED is a 3.5A XM-L by nailbender, so nothing above 1,000 to include in these....
So here are the results (ordered by perceived dimmest to brightest)...
:devil:
:devil::devil:
:devil::devil::devil:
:devil::devil::devil::devil:
Surprises from this this shootout:
- The older 3x XR-E M2XC4 (~675 lumen) is brighter than my ~850 lumen 3.5A XM-L
- The Mag458, although painfully bright and easily twice as bright as the solid 2,000 lumen Mag09, still does not have the output of the FF3.
- The Fire Foxes FF3 = ridiculous:
- Looks to be twice as bright as the ~3,500 lumen 35W POB
- Handily stomped the brightest hand-held light anyone I knew had - the Mag458 w/ 5x 26,500 IMR @ 4.15v
- The FF3 is claimed be 40W, but some suspect it is pushing more than that. Based on these comparisons, my guess is that it is, and it is probably more in the 5,000 lumen range - scientifically speaking..
Last edited: