Luxeon T LEDs announced

anuragwap

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
115
Location
India
Press release here. There are 95 CRI options with R9 of 90. Great if they can give us something like Nichia 219 at a lower price and 4000+K CCT.

EDIT: More info here. From the datasheet, 95 CRI version comes only in 3000K, sigh! I won't be surprised if they are never available in real life, they have done this before with many announced products.
 
Last edited:

saabluster

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
3,736
Location
Garland Tx
If they can deliver on the promises in that press release then this will be an incredible little LED. I really like that they are releasing the high CRI stuff first and then bringing out the 70 CRI parts. It is a sign they are more in tune with the market IMO.
 

ICUDoc

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
907
Location
Sydney, Australia
Looks good so far- can't see them in the store at Future, though....
And thanks for that pdf link- looks like the chip is 1.45x1.25mm in size?
 
Last edited:

idleprocess

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
7,197
Location
decamped
Oh, I'm sure that the 95CRI part will be available ... in minuscule quantities to Lumileds' most favored customers at a fantastic price.
 

bshanahan14rulz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
2,819
Location
Tennessee
Noted "Laser Mark Area" on the bottom of the package. I wonder if Luxeon is going to start etching binning info onto individual LEDs?

Also wonder how the rectangular die will affect our beams in reflectors.

More LEDs is never a bad thing :)
 
Last edited:

Gunner12

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
10,063
Location
Bay Area, CA
I think a rectangular die might give a more oval hotspot. The 90+ CRI ones are all too warm for my taste though.
 

Gunner12

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
10,063
Location
Bay Area, CA
I haven't tried the Nichia 219 high CRI LEDs, but I do have a Seoul P4 93 CRI with a neutral tint and I really like it. The Luxeon Ts at 90+ CRI are all too warm for my taste (at least according to the spec sheet).
 

SemiMan

Banned
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
3,899
As much as the good CRI/efficiency is important, what I consider as a designer (okay, when not fighting fires) as really cool, is the mix of CRI, efficiency, and really tight color binning in single emitters. Many of the things I have developed are either lower volume and/or a bunch in a given area. Cree is usually a write-off I find unless you use a multi-die package. Nichia can be tolerable, but still issues. This is fantastic for many of the things I do. Sure I would like another 10+ lumens/watt, but this is a real time saver and enabler. It may not matter much for flashlights though.
 

croled

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
12
Luxeon Ts finally in 70 cri version:
http://www.philipslumileds.com/products/luxeon-t

5700K and 70cri minimum version spews 348lm , 122lm/W typical at 1A. For comparison,Xp-g2 5000-8300K and 70cri typical highest R5 bin is 338lm , 112,7lm/W maximum at 1A.
Even xm-l2 u2 is about 116lm/w at the same conditions(500mA/mm2,85C).
Now something like that in xm-l size...
 
Last edited:

jtr1962

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
7,505
Location
Flushing, NY
It looks like there's practically no droop at higher currents. The 5700K part outputs 136 lumens @ 350 mA. If there was no droop you would have 388.6 lumens at 1 amp. The 348 lumens the part actually does give at that current is only 10.6% less.
 

SemiMan

Banned
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
3,899
It looks like there's practically no droop at higher currents. The 5700K part outputs 136 lumens @ 350 mA. If there was no droop you would have 388.6 lumens at 1 amp. The 348 lumens the part actually does give at that current is only 10.6% less.

I like the tolerable CRI, 4000K parts at 140 lumens/watt.

Would be nice to see the LM80 data. Lumileds parts tend to take more abuse without degradation versus Cree. That could spell less lumen depreciation at lower currents ... great for long life products and/or less derating during design.


No bins! ... what a concept too ... on color and brightness it looks like. Seems like a great real world part.

As a side note, noticed that Mouser is carrying Lumileds now.


Semiman
 
Last edited:

radellaf

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
1,097
Location
Raleigh, NC
Die shot of the SC52d emitter on low moon mode. What I'd like to know is how badly (or if) they're overdriving it to get 300OTF lumens from the 85CRI 5000K part. I don't think you get quite 300 off the emitter at the spec'd limit of 1 Amp. I'm not even sure if they changed the circuit from whatever current they were using (1.5A?) to get 500lm OTF from the XM-L.

So, overdriving a Lux T at maybe 1.5A? How bad would that be?

15383062166_7ef46e5058_o.jpg

link
 
Last edited:

SemiMan

Banned
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
3,899
It is speced at 300 lumens at 85C and 1amp on the >80cri 5000k part. It is rated I believe to 1.2A so 300 otf is possible though perhaps overstated by 5-10%.
 

radellaf

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
1,097
Location
Raleigh, NC
Ok, good to know. I can't find that spec sheet, but I won't worry about it. I just realized, and read the whole thread, for the SC62d and c. They run the Lux T flat-out and continuously at 300+ claimed lumens and nobody seems to have popped an emitter. The 52d only drives it that hard for one minute at a time so I guess I won't worry. I certainly enjoy the turbo mode and am glad it can handle it.
 

Latest posts

Top