That still doesn't sound like there is much of a difference in quality to justify almost $100 especially when the Fenix has much better specs.
The difference in quality is indeed quite large.
My Surefires are far more durable than my Fenix by design, i.e. far better anodizing (with respect to wear resistance, not coloring), better threads, thicker walled aluminum. My surefire emitters & reflectors also provide superior beam quality. Compared to the E2D, the PD30 and P3D feel downright fragile. Carrying my PD30 in the back pocket (by itself) of fairly loose fitting jeans or side pocket of cargo shorts for a couple months was enough to cause noticeable wear to the anodizing. That shouldn't happen with Type III anodizing, especially if it is truly MilSpec. The MilSpec Type III anodizing of Surefires doesn't show wear like that when similarly given a dedicated pocket. Given the sloppy machining and the second rate finish, I have to wonder what other corners Fenix cut to keep their costs down.
* The two companies simply have different standards when it comes to what constitutes good enough to send out the door branded with the company logo.
Fenix is a big step up from most cheap LED lights one might find in a discount department store, e.g., Walmart, but they're nowhere near the same league as Surefire.
You get what you pay for. How much quality do you want/need? If all I ever did was hunt white walls to show off gimmicky features, the Fenix would probably be my favorite torch, because it does have better specs
on paper. For real world use, however, I'm just not confident that it will always work when needed. Maybe it will, but I don't
trust it to.
*I also tried a couple Fenix bike mounts, and found them to be a poorly engineered, rattly pieces of junk, which didn't improve my perception of Fenix quality any.