Protac hl vs tn11s human trials

For starters i am some what new to the cpf world. This may sound like a stupid question and seem like a bad thing to do but I'm curious. Last night a buddy of my shined his protac hl and my tn11s into another guys eyes from across the table and asked which was brighter.... The guy along with a second test subject picked the protac hl. So that got me wondering how that's possible when all the number of the tn11s are much higher. Now. The obvious thing to do is take them out side and shine them up against something but I didn't wanna make it look like a pissing contest. So why did the protac seem noticeably brighter to human eyes.

Bump.

1. Thrunite is lying about its output

2. light into the eyes is too subjective to lend to any sort of comparison.

The PROTAC HL is a great light. Being programmable you can eliminate the low output or strobe function depending on your requirements. Paladin

Easy to Understand Lumens Vs Lux Explanation

The protac hl may be more colminated than your tn11s. Your test isn't the most reliable way of determining which is brightest.

Norm

Was there beer involved?