BlindedByTheLite
Flashlight Enthusiast
Okay. There have been several times when I thought I had this down.
.. but I always find out otherwise.
First, I heard it was to liberate Iraq. Then I heard it was to *dethrone* Hussein. Then I heard it was to uncover WMD's..
Is it all? Is it nothing?
Could we have just gone straight for Hussein @ the beginning of it all and either avoided the severity of our invasion, or @ least delivered a crippling blow from the start of it all that would've made the battle a bit easier to fight?
I understand Hussein needed to be taken out. I agree 100%. I just don't understand so many troops die'ing over such a drawn out period of time.. I think we lost more than we gained.
Help me sort this out, please.
.. but I always find out otherwise.
First, I heard it was to liberate Iraq. Then I heard it was to *dethrone* Hussein. Then I heard it was to uncover WMD's..
Is it all? Is it nothing?
Could we have just gone straight for Hussein @ the beginning of it all and either avoided the severity of our invasion, or @ least delivered a crippling blow from the start of it all that would've made the battle a bit easier to fight?
I understand Hussein needed to be taken out. I agree 100%. I just don't understand so many troops die'ing over such a drawn out period of time.. I think we lost more than we gained.
Help me sort this out, please.