GillBates
Newly Enlightened
Do all Fenix tk61's come with a 170000cd intrnsity? I'm about to order one and just want to make sure that I get a nice "cool white" light.
Thanks
Thanks
Ive heard, and have some friends, who are extremely dissapointed in the TK61 they received, because they saw no difference in intensity at the turbomode, with the TK75 also on turbo, and some of them only measured not even 100 kcd at turbo.
They called it, like a TK75 with 2 defect leds. So they send it immeadiately back.
So, whats really wrong with this light, like some persons reported, and with alot of other flashlights?
Why aere most lights well below the manufacterer number of kcd? Why is this?
I really hate this. When i buy a light that has manufacterer listed 180 kcd, i want 180 kcd, not 100 kcd, therefore you have the TK75, which is also faar below 92000 kcd(old version)
Mine has only 70000 kcd, i guess, hope im wrong.
Can somebody explain this, why most flashlights are well below the manufacterer state of kcd?
Don't have the exactly specs. But my dealer measured 2 lux at 290 meters...
Ive heard, and have some friends, who are extremely dissapointed in the TK61 they received, because they saw no difference in intensity at the turbomode, with the TK75 also on turbo, and some of them only measured not even 100 kcd at turbo.
They called it, like a TK75 with 2 defect leds. So they send it immeadiately back.
I have 2 conclusions,your friends all bought defective lights,or they dont understand about the tk61,i guess the latter.
The standard tk61 is 1000lm,around 1/3lm of the tk75,both light are completely different.The tk75 offers good throw and good flood,so a good all round light.The tk61 is specifically for throw(admittedly you do get a bonus of useful flood too). Completely different reflector/head,far deeper and larger for throw...
I guess maybe they expected too much........dont know,but unless they have around 500-800m clear distance,armed with both lights,they may not see the tk61 benefit.At 200yds though the hot spot should be more intense..........
I wonder how you measured this? What equipment are you using to read the intensity? And there are many factors which can influence the output.
Don't understand this part :thinking:held my old TK75 side by side with my TK60 800 lumen, 55000 kcd ...
Ive heard, and have some friends, who are extremely dissapointed in the TK61 they received, because they saw no difference in intensity at the turbomode, with the TK75 also on turbo, and some of them only measured not even 100 kcd at turbo.
They called it, like a TK75 with 2 defect leds. So they send it immeadiately back.
Mine TK61 is perfect, i guess over 170 kcd, and hotspot looks more than 3 times as bright than my old TK75.
I have 2 conclusions,your friends all bought defective lights,or they dont understand about the tk61,i guess the latter.
The standard tk61 is 1000lm,around 1/3lm of the tk75,both light are completely different.The tk75 offers good throw and good flood,so a good all round light.The tk61 is specifically for throw(admittedly you do get a bonus of useful flood too). Completely different reflector/head,far deeper and larger for throw...
I guess maybe they expected too much........dont know,but unless they have around 500-800m clear distance,armed with both lights,they may not see the tk61 benefit.At 200yds though the hot spot should be more intense..........
Hi kj2,
I not measured it, held my old TK75 side by side with my TK60 800 lumen, 55000 kcd shining at the wall of my house, and they look equally bright.
No, a friend have a lightmeter.
I am not sure you guys understand how small the difference is between 140-170kcd it might as well be negligible. I highly doubt that any model of this light is putting out less than 100kcd look at the diameter of the reflector vs. the die surface area. You would have to be driving it less than 2A. I agree that the TN32 is a better light for several reasons, first being UI and it has a better design and is being driven harder so that you get more lumens and useful spill.