The TESLA Flashlight

Many outstanding Inventors have made incredible contributions to the human race.

However, arguably, Nicola Tesla remains the greatest. There is just not enough storage space on a server to record all his work but let me just mention here some of what I remain fascinated with:

- Nicola Tesla drove a previously inspected car in which he put a device that, having attracted electricity from the atmosphere, powered the vehicle;

- On another occasion, Tesla put a device (about the dimensions of an old Walkman-- remember those?) on a tree, turned it on, and soon thereafter powerful vibrations could be felt as far as five miles away which prompted many residents, who thought they were experiencing an earthquake, to call the Police in droves. When the Police arrived, Tesla walked up to the tree, turned off the device and the vibrations ceased. He removed it from the tree, walked away, and everyone went home;

- Nicola Tesla also was the Inventor of a device that could wirelessly transmit electricity around the globe, at no cost.

In sum, Nicola Tesla was a person who both delighted in and was passionate about his work, so much so that he died in poverty, having become the victim of what attorneys would describe today as MASSIVE theft of intellectual property.

When Tesla became victimized, so did the entire human race!

Moreover, quite tragically and I argue unjustifiably, most if not all of Nicola Tesla's most important work and genius remains "classified" by both the former Yugoslavan government and that of the United States, as well as suppressed by a collusion of powerful interests whose Tesla's work and inventions continue to threaten.

(Imagine, if you will, receiving not one utility bill ever, thanks to the great Nicola Tesla. How much more disposable income or accumulated savings would you have?)

Now we come to what I term "the Tesla flashlight".

From what I have read on and about Tesla, he did not "work" on any flashlights per se.

But his invention that harnessed electricity that (he both proclaimed and proved) surrounded the Earth and would likewise be an infinite energy source for all of humanity could also serve as the source that would power a flashlight!

The only problem would be that if someone fooled with the part of the device that inputted the flow of electricity into something-- say the TM26 or the TK-75-- it conceivably could blow it out or up!

Could you imagine everyone having a standard 10,000 lumens flashlight? (which the great Vin would no doubt "tweak" to 17,000!)

As I also understand it, applying Tesla's suppressed invention would eliminate the need for batteries, at least as we presently understand or utilize them.

Thus, it will be up to all the people of our 50 States and of the entire planet to demand the release of all of Tesla's suppressed technology, and while we're at it, the inventions of many others-- too many documented to list here-- whose lives became threatened if they brought their work "to market".

in the final analysis, Nicola Tesla is perhaps the best shining example and proof of that the Creator did not give the human race an Earth whose "natural" resources would become "finite" but rather resources and human brilliance that could become vulnerable to the darkness and conniving of a few destructive individuals who not only have caused the suppression of genius but also, untold, incalculable suffering.

Tesla is but one example. A second (of many) is the late Stanley Meyer who used electrolysis to extract energy from hydrogen and powered his modified dune buggy 100-miles on one gallon of water! A third example: enough sunlight falls on the planet in one hour to power everything for a day but a New York Times Editorial dated 4/27/14 will tell you about the suppression of affordable solar technology through undue, unjust taxes on such engineered by two people not in government.

Clearly, as the Book of Proverbs states, 'for the sake of profit, many sin'.

Yet, the GOOD news is that such suppression does not have to be, if overcoming it became our political will, and that of the planet!

Moreover, as this website and its readers and posters can attest, there is not enough darkness to put out the light of one small flashlight.

So to paraphrase the song:

This little [flash]light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine
I'm gonna let it shine, I'm gonna let it shine
This little [flash]light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine
Let it shine, let it shine, let it shine.


LetThereBeLight!

Are you familiar with the first law of thermodynamics? Where is all this free energy coming from? What's the conversion efficiency?

Anything, any energy we harness from planetary nature will eventually run it down. Think of earth as a gigantic self contained / self reconditioning battery. Anything that humans do to "make life better" is ALWAYS in favor of humans. This means that any form of energy that we harness will have SOME negative side effect. For example, technology is good, but there is ALWAYS an equal amount of evil to the good that comes from it (even if it may not be immediately apparent). We harness wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power and claim that it is a sustainable form of energy. However, is is usually forgotten that in order to convert something into something else, that first something must be harnessed. This means removing some of the potential of whatever we're harnessing and changing into something that we can use.

Now imagine THOUSANDS of these tiny 'cells' constantly harnessing energy from what was once the free flowing equilibrium of nature; what happens in a few centuries? A few millenia, even? We are draining the world faster than the equilibrium can be restored. The slightest change in air currents in one region may affect global weather. The slightest bottleneck of ocean currents can disrupt hundreds of natural habitats. Geothermal sites are 'harnessing' energy that might be necessary for the shifting of tectonic plates to release energy. In the same respect, harnessing the earth's 'electromagnetic energy' will most likely throw SOMETHING out of balance and may spell disaster for the world. Like you've mentioned, the world spins on a dime. Even with the promotion of this "global electric distribution", there would be SOME way that SOMEBODY will find a way to profit from it. (device subscriptions, distribution costs, etc.)

As you might have implied, because of sin, EVERYTHING and ANYTHING we do will ALWAYS have a negative as long as we live as untranscended beings.

hmmmm.....

Kilroytheknifesnob said:

Are you familiar with the first law of thermodynamics? Where is all this free energy coming from? What's the conversion efficiency?

Click to expand...

Dude, I'm stunned you have not read a thing on or about Tesla.

But no matter, if don't care to study Tesla's work or at least read about it, you can have your mind blown just as much by checking out cheniere.org and learn about Tom Bearden's work.

Or, look up "suppressed free energy inventions" and the science that they evidence.

Yes, most of your assumptions will be blown away.

LetThereBeLight!

I hope Morgan and Edison got their comeuppance.

how about reading one of the books? (--> to lettherebelight, not the others)
((the fantastic inventions of Nicola Tesla))

there is no "magic", it was "just" him to "invent" the AC pulse,
everything else is basic electronics today,
at his and Edisons time is was more than revolutionary, of course.


(therefore, again, read the book. Then wonder, that what the things acutally DO is the smalles part of any of the things shown. The most part, 3/4, cover how to make an isolated high voltage coil/inductor. At his time the most important thing in the setups, for us, now, a joke to get. And cheap too)


PS: most of the "things" You mention are simply experiments of thought, he did not DO them ...
PPS: if we could see all that junk - radio waves, cellphone, ... - that surrounds us, we would skip all that crap that, if nothing else, does not improve our health ...

Simply 'experiments of thoughts'?

On what basis do you state that? Clearly, you state no basis on which to support your points.

I find your reply to be SO disjointed.

You are one of the millions, maybe Billions, sadly, who have been DUPED by The Powers That Be!

Of course TPTB want you to believe Tesla's greatest contributions were "experiments of thoughts" (your euphemism for fantasies!)

Because THAT way they make ZILLIONS from US!

And you BOUGHT into TPTB: hook, line, and sinker. So sad.

Which is why you will CONTINUE to pay utility bills.

Or, are you just another DISinformation/Dismissive specialist so this thread does not go "viral"?

Nor have you addressed Stanley Meyer's work nor Tom Bearden's.



LetThereBeLight!

Stanley Meyer is a scammer. A perpetual motion machine is impossible. The energy required to split water into it's elements will ALWAYS be more than what you get back by recombining them in a fuel cell. Come on man, surely you don't believe his scientifically impossible claims?

LetThereBeLight! said:

Simply 'experiments of thoughts'?

On what basis do you state that? Clearly, you state no basis on which to support your points.

I find your reply to be SO disjointed.

You are one of the millions, maybe Billions, sadly, who have been DUPED by The Powers That Be!

Of course TPTB want you to believe Tesla's greatest contributions were "experiments of thoughts" (your euphemism for fantasies!)

Because THAT way they make ZILLIONS from US!

And you BOUGHT into TPTB: hook, line, and sinker. So sad.

Which is why you will CONTINUE to pay utility bills.

Or, are you just another DISinformation/Dismissive specialist so this thread does not go "viral"?

Nor have you addressed Stanley Meyer's work nor Tom Bearden's.



LetThereBeLight!

Click to expand...

You lost all credibility in my eyes once you got into the "powers that be" nonsense.

Lets just say I invent a Zero Point energy machine. Do you think I'd be bought out by the oil companies or some government? Not a chance in hell. My name would be up there with Newton and Einstein for all of history. I'd have all the power in the universe - literally!

I don't buy into that sort of stuff.

dc38 makes a very good point. Take Geothermal energy for example. It's a massive power source indeed, but what happens after a few throusand years of sapping power from the core of the planet? it'll start to cool down! Once it cools, the molten core stops spinning, the electromagnetic field collapses and the atmosphere is torn away by solar winds. We end up looking an awful lot like Mars.

There cannot be energy taken from a system without a cost. The laws of thermodynamics boil down to this: You cannot win. You cannot break even. You will always lose.

The energy required to split water into it's elements will ALWAYS be more than what you get back by recombining them in a fuel cell.

Click to expand...

This is a perfect example.

What a strange thread.....

Kilroytheknifesnob said:

Stanley Meyer is a scammer. A perpetual motion machine is impossible. The energy required to split water into it's elements will ALWAYS be more than what you get back by recombining them in a fuel cell. Come on man, surely you don't believe his scientifically impossible claims?

Click to expand...

So Mr. Meyer was a scammer because you do not understand how he utilized electrolysis?

By the way, nowhere in his work is there ANY mention of "a perpetual motion machine", so why do you confuse issues as you have in previous posts?

mvyrmnd said:

You lost all credibility in my eyes once you got into the "powers that be" nonsense.

Lets just say I invent a Zero Point energy machine. Do you think I'd be bought out by the oil companies or some government? Not a chance in hell. My name would be up there with Newton and Einstein for all of history. I'd have all the power in the universe - literally!

I don't buy into that sort of stuff.

dc38 makes a very good point. Take Geothermal energy for example. It's a massive power source indeed, but what happens after a few throusand years of sapping power from the core of the planet? it'll start to cool down! Once it cools, the molten core stops spinning, the electromagnetic field collapses and the atmosphere is torn away by solar winds. We end up looking an awful lot like Mars.

There cannot be energy taken from a system without a cost. The laws of thermodynamics boil down to this: You cannot win. You cannot break even. You will always lose.



This is a perfect example.

Click to expand...

Apparently, you have not studied Tom Bearden's website. So if your mind is closed, why should I expend valuable energy seeking to have an enlightening dialogue?

yearnslow said:

What a strange thread.....

Click to expand...

You're right. It IS a strange thread.

That's because a genius like Tesla himself was perceived as strange.

Why?

Because he did not confine his mind nor his intellect to what was already "known" but to the unknown.

As a result of both his drive and his imagination, the papers detailing his greatest work-- perhaps the greatest of any inventor dead or alive-- remain classified as previously described.

That indeed is strange, isn't it?

LetThereBeLight!

Why is it classified ?

Well, from what I can gather, it seems Tesla had invented a means of producing energy from the earth at little cost, which would relieve mankind of the problem of energy and it's cultivation.
The Authorities have suppressed this innovation with the express intention of making the people of the earth reliant on them for power, so they can in fact make money, and exert total control.
(Money; which is of course an irrelevant concept.)

.....Or something along those lines....

LetThereBeLight! said:

Apparently, you have not studied Tom Bearden's website. So if your mind is closed, why should I expend valuable energy seeking to have an enlightening dialogue?

Click to expand...

Just to humour you, and to rule out your argument of me being "closed minded" by adhering to the laws of thermodynamics, I've been and looked at his website.

Aside from being ancient (in internet terms), and half of the links being broken (probably taken down by the government!), and being littered with logical fallacies, I find little there that compels me.

He never manages to complete a story about some crackpot device without either the American or Soviet government being involved...

Never mind this:

"Let me now give you a rigorous proof, and very simple, that every system is already vastly overunity by producing far more energy out than we input. Consider a perfect DC generator, loss free, so that its efficiency is 100%. Now consider a perfect external circuit attached, which consists of two short lengths of perfect conducting wire, and a pure resistance load. Let the load be 12 ohms, and the voltage of the generator be 12 Volts D.C. Now we have a neat little situation: We put in the mechanical power equivalent of 12 watts to the shaft. Since the generator is loss free, all the 12 watts are perfectly transduced into magnetic field, and the energy in this field is dissipated with 100% efficiency to form the source dipole. Let us leave the source dipole for a moment.
Now we look at the external circuit. There is one ampere of current (12V divided by 12 Ohms) flowing in the external circuit. So we are inputting 12 watts of power to the generator shaft, and we are getting 12 watts of power output in the resistor. All this is clearly measurable and normal so far."

So he goes off into a little thought experiment... that is completely impossible! There is no such thing as a perfect DC generator, or a Perfect, loss free conductor.

This guys proof is based on impossible things!

dc38 said:

Anything, any energy we harness from planetary nature will eventually run it down. Think of earth as a gigantic self contained / self reconditioning battery. Anything that humans do to "make life better" is ALWAYS in favor of humans. This means that any form of energy that we harness will have SOME negative side effect. For example, technology is good, but there is ALWAYS an equal amount of evil to the good that comes from it (even if it may not be immediately apparent). We harness wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power and claim that it is a sustainable form of energy. However, is is usually forgotten that in order to convert something into something else, that first something must be harnessed. This means removing some of the potential of whatever we're harnessing and changing into something that we can use.

Now imagine THOUSANDS of these tiny 'cells' constantly harnessing energy from what was once the free flowing equilibrium of nature; what happens in a few centuries? A few millenia, even? We are draining the world faster than the equilibrium can be restored. The slightest change in air currents in one region may affect global weather. The slightest bottleneck of ocean currents can disrupt hundreds of natural habitats. Geothermal sites are 'harnessing' energy that might be necessary for the shifting of tectonic plates to release energy. In the same respect, harnessing the earth's 'electromagnetic energy' will most likely throw SOMETHING out of balance and may spell disaster for the world. Like you've mentioned, the world spins on a dime. Even with the promotion of this "global electric distribution", there would be SOME way that SOMEBODY will find a way to profit from it. (device subscriptions, distribution costs, etc.)

As you might have implied, because of sin, EVERYTHING and ANYTHING we do will ALWAYS have a negative as long as we live as untranscended beings.

Click to expand...

That pesky solar energy. Always throwing things out of whack.

TheFraz said:

That pesky solar energy. Always throwing things out of whack.

Click to expand...

Ahh but it is.

How about a thousand years of us using photovoltaic solar? All that light that we've trapped on the planet rather than it being reflected back into space, and eventually converted to heat after using it for various tasks. Yes it's free now, but what do we do with all the heat?

mvyrmnd said:

Ahh but it is.

How about a thousand years of us using photovoltaic solar? All that light that we've trapped on the planet rather than it being reflected back into space, and eventually converted to heat after using it for various tasks. Yes it's free now, but what do we do with all the heat?

Click to expand...

Yes, I was being a bit sarcastic - I was addressing the problem of the finite nature of energy on this planet (which is the only thing dc seemed to address) as it pertains to burning or converting various forms of energy (which will result in a net of zero). However, as far as I can tell, all that heat from the sun will be absorbed regardless of reflections back into space. You are able to see a solar panel because of its reflection of light back on to your face - it is not capable of non-reflection, thus not capable of perfect absorption of solar energy. However, solar is a very large contributor to weather patterns and a large percentage of all energy that gets dumped onto our heads, like the tornadoes we just got here in Arkansas, it is from our good buddy the Sun. The seas absorb an incomprehensible amount of energy per year (exactly like a solar panel), and have been absorbing that energy for an incomprehensible number of years (excuse the number of times I just used the word incomprehensible).

(and excuse the number of time I just used "()"). Blue Moon tends to do that to a guy.