I never watched the news or read the paper unless something that could potentially change my life was happening. If Mrs. Brown's house burnt down, it is of no interest to most people as 99% of us can't do anything about it (unless they actually mentioned how to give her support money, which never happens) and, sadly, newspapers and broadcasts are mostly about insignificant stuff like that. I sure would shove the camera up a cameraman's rear if he was asking me how I feel while my house was burning down.
Even everyone who is on the stock market always get surprised that the stocks are crashing when they are at the highest ever. History teaches us that man learns nothing from history, so why bother with the replay?
On top of that, I have countless times witnessed BS being propagated by bored reporters who, I am guessing, stopped investigating a mundane subject the second they got an answer they were satisfied with... but never asked the right person in the whole process. First, wood cutting boards were bad because wood can retain bacteria. Then plastic boards were bad, because you cut plastic slivers when cutting your food on them. Then someone finally researched far enough to come to the conclusion that wood is best for anything but meat products, for which we should use a plastic board. Surprise... I was 10 years ahead of the mindless idiots who needed someone else to cut the data into pieces for a whole decade until one journalist was able to ask a health expert rather than a restaurant chef. News medias are just people talking about stuff they know nothing about. Put the specialist in front of the camera and I'll listen to him, not the guy trying to make a buck with some subject he's researching for the first time in his entire life.
My 2 cents