Stupid science

GordoJones88

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
1,157
Location
Tennessee
27043125915_9c990fc8c1_c.jpg
 

jorn

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
2,499
Location
Norway
Visible light itself is not heat. I think the heat is more of a bi product. Light from halogen got more heat than light from a led, so its hard to tell how many lumens you need. Example.The old cars got halogen, and the glass on the headlamps never froze. If it was covered in snow, it melted. Then hid came and problems with ice film on the headlamp arrived (atleast in the arctic part of the world). Now the led made the problem even worse...
 

vadimax

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
2,273
Location
Vilnius, Lithuania
Ok, checked it myself. The primary problem is to get a quality magnifying glass that itself renders the idea useless. Crap glass just cannot collect a flashlight emission in one focal point. Even TN32 at its declared 1702 lm just managed to make a black carton rather warm in 2 minutes, but nothing more. Major effect was hurting my eyes with reflection from the black surface :thinking::fail:
 
Last edited:

eekazum

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
1,050
I agree with jorn about heat being a byproduct of light.
The reverse of his example are those parabolic heaters that produce a warm glow but puts out a pretty intense beam of heat. I wonder in you can somehow "magnify" that to a single focal point to start fires miles away like a magic trick. Hmmm...
With these led flashlights tho, you are better off trying to burn something using the heatsink instead.
 
Top