Xhp70 vs Xhp70.2

Bruno28

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
508
Location
Australia
From what I saw in Cree website. It was about 200lm extra. But don't quote me on it exactly.
 

iamlucky13

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
1,139
P2 is an output bin. It's the same regardless of the emitter type. However, it's only available in the XHP70.2. The older version tops out at N4.

XHP70 datasheet:
http://www.cree.com/led-components/media/documents/ds-XHP70.pdf

XHP70.2 datasheet:
http://www.cree.com/led-components/media/documents/ds-XHP702_1.pdf

From those, using the Easywhite 5000K 70 CRI data at 1050mA and 12V, the best XHP70 bin output is 1710 lumens (N4), versus 1830 lumens for the XHP70.2 (P2), so an extra 120 lumens or 7% output gain.

Because the latter also claims slightly less efficiency loss at the maximum 2400mA current, the outputs there should be about 3250 lumens and 3550 lumens. That's an extra 300 lumens or 9% gain.

Cree is also claiming a pretty significant reduction in forward voltage for the newer emitter - about 7% at max current. If true, then that combined with the increased output in that new bin means as much as a 17% improvement in efficacy for the best of the 70.2 line.
 

MAD777

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
4,443
Location
White Mountains, NH, USA
The 70.2 responds to modding much better than the old 70.
@vinhnguyen54 has pushed 25,000 ANSI lumens from 4 XHP70.2 in an Acebeam X45vn.
Here's mine....
ee998fa7591415ce924fd73fe9dd3373.jpg
 

sarahze

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15
The 70.2 responds to modding much better than the old 70.
@vinhnguyen54 has pushed 25,000 ANSI lumens from 4 XHP70.2 in an Acebeam X45vn.
Here's mine....
ee998fa7591415ce924fd73fe9dd3373.jpg

But this X45vn is new driver with XHP70.2, not the stock driver..
 

sarahze

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15
P2 is an output bin. It's the same regardless of the emitter type. However, it's only available in the XHP70.2. The older version tops out at N4.

XHP70 datasheet:
http://www.cree.com/led-components/media/documents/ds-XHP70.pdf

XHP70.2 datasheet:
http://www.cree.com/led-components/media/documents/ds-XHP702_1.pdf

From those, using the Easywhite 5000K 70 CRI data at 1050mA and 12V, the best XHP70 bin output is 1710 lumens (N4), versus 1830 lumens for the XHP70.2 (P2), so an extra 120 lumens or 7% output gain.

Because the latter also claims slightly less efficiency loss at the maximum 2400mA current, the outputs there should be about 3250 lumens and 3550 lumens. That's an extra 300 lumens or 9% gain.

Cree is also claiming a pretty significant reduction in forward voltage for the newer emitter - about 7% at max current. If true, then that combined with the increased output in that new bin means as much as a 17% improvement in efficacy for the best of the 70.2 line.

I have read this datasheets of xhp70 P2 bin and xhp70.2
P2 bin, They are same output "1830 lumen"...
but Xhp70.2 has p4 bin, 1965 lumen 7% gain.
is its correct?
sorry for my bad english
 

iamlucky13

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
1,139
I have read this datasheets of xhp70 P2 bin and xhp70.2
P2 bin, They are same output "1830 lumen"...
but Xhp70.2 has p4 bin, 1965 lumen 7% gain.
is its correct?
sorry for my bad english

Correct.

Also, I apologize because I missed the tables (page 15 for XHP70 and 13 for XHP70.2) listing the bins. I was looking at different tables and saw one less bin for each, but the 7% gain is correct.
 

WaffleBuggy

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
14
??? My Eagletac MX30L3-r with a single N4 xhp70 is pushing 3893 ANSI lumens.

Vinh has noticed the xhp50.2 can be driven much harder while creating much less heat vs the xhp50. Hopefully the 70.2 also results in less heat. I'm kinda interested in seing what a 70.2 might be like in my MX30L3-r (lumens and beam pattern)
 

iamlucky13

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
1,139
1710 lumens is at 1050 mA, while the LED is rated for a max of 2400 mA.

But it's max rating isn't necessarily the maximum it can take. It's the maximum Cree provides data for. Not having the ability to test them myself, I can't explore the limits like Eagletac might be able to.
 

Zak

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
257
I suspect the more significant improvement to be found with the XHP70.2 is a reduction in donut holes in the middle of the hotspots since the phosphors appear to have smaller gaps between them.
 
Top