SF M4 vs TL?

ResQTech

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
1,151
Location
NJ, USA
How does the light output and throw of the Surefire M4 LOLA compare to a stock Tigerlight?
 

Joe Talmadge

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
2,200
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
I'd put the Tigerlight as having a bit more lumens than the M4 LOLA. The M4's beam is much smoother, with a bigger hotspot. The Tigerlight's beam is objectionably artifact-y, but nowhere near SF smooth. It has a smaller, much brighter hotspot that throws much farther.

Were I using these as tactical lights, I'd prefer the M4 in a house, the Tigerlight in a warehouse.
 

Prolepsis

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 21, 2003
Messages
577
Location
B.C.
My TigerLight also throws farther than my M4. However, on HOLA (I know you didn't ask specifically), the TigerLight outthrows it by a little bit, but the M4 lights up a bigger area.

Like Joe said, however, the M4 has a smoother beam and a bigger hotspot /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

Joe Talmadge

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
2,200
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
[ QUOTE ]
Joe Talmadge said:
I'd put the Tigerlight as having a bit more lumens than the M4 LOLA. The M4's beam is much smoother, with a bigger hotspot. The Tigerlight's beam is objectionably artifact-y, but nowhere near SF smooth.

[/ QUOTE ]

BTW, I meant to say that the Tigerlight's beam is not objectionably artifact-y. It's not SF smooth, but it's not horrible.
 

ResQTech

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
1,151
Location
NJ, USA
Thanks for all the replies! I guess it all boils down to one question: Is the M4 worth over 2x the cost of the TL?
 

Prolepsis

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 21, 2003
Messages
577
Location
B.C.
Depends on what you plan to use it for.

Both:
- HA III
- nice and bright /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
- water resistant

TigerLight pros
- shorter (the FBOP version, that is)
- rechargeable (guilt free)
- better throw
- cheaper

TigerLight cons
- uglier (personal opinion)
- 10 hr trickle charger
- stock plastic lense (can be easily switched for a UCL)
- heavier

SureFire M4 pros
- nicer beam/wider beam
- LOLA or HOLA
- parts swappable with other SureFires
- can accept 168s (for some setups)
- stock pyrex lense

SureFire M4 cons
- battery cost
- cost of the light
- kind of long and skinny
- head may be a little heavy (balance is ok for me, though)

I like to use both lights, but I have been using my M4 more, mainly b/c I usually don't need *that* much throw and because I just bought it recently /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif I usually swap out the batteries pretty early on and then drop them in my LED lights. But then again, the TigerLight is rechargeable, so that's always a plus in my books.
 

Joe Talmadge

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
2,200
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
In all honesty, I'm directed people who ask towards Tigerlight these days. I don't like to think of it in terms of whether the M4 is "worth" more. There's no non-rechargeable out there quite like the M4 or M6, and there's no doubt that they are very high quality lights. But I can get the performance I want from a Tigerlight, provided I'm willing to deal with the heavier weight and the fact that it's a rechargeable (I think staying on top of rechargeable batteries is a pain). And using the TL feels "free", since it's rechargeable.

I'd be looking at the M4 if I felt the light was only going to be used infrequently, so that 1. battery costs aren't an issue, and 2. it is critical that I always have a feel for the charge state of the batteries.

I imagine if you want a more M4ish beam from the TL, you can use some write-right.

Joe
 
Top