Now that I have all three models, I can compare them.
The Second has excellent finish and no signs of exterior damage. There is some flaking inside the lens, but it doesn't affect function. The beam is tinted yellow, but not so much tinted that it looks bad. This second is a standard LSH.
My LSH-S (First) has a moderately pink tinted beam and is a little brighter than the second, but not by much. The anodizing seems a little thinner on the first. I actually have 2 (first) standards, but they are so close in performance (both are tinted pink) that one of the two is a good representation for my simple comparison.
My LSH-P (first) has slight pink tint in the beam, and the finish is the best of the three (even though it does have the tiger stripes). However....it doesn't appear to be ANY brighter than the other two. The better tint makes up for the disapointing brightness (I figured the LSH-P spec 22 lumens would look brighter than the spec LSH-S 17 lumens--but when I compare mine side by side it doesn't).
All three I like, I'm just trying to decide if the LSH-P is worth the extra $50 (over the standard), when the Arc-4 beats out the LSH-P by a big margin at only $30 extra dollars.
What are your observations and thoughts?
The Second has excellent finish and no signs of exterior damage. There is some flaking inside the lens, but it doesn't affect function. The beam is tinted yellow, but not so much tinted that it looks bad. This second is a standard LSH.
My LSH-S (First) has a moderately pink tinted beam and is a little brighter than the second, but not by much. The anodizing seems a little thinner on the first. I actually have 2 (first) standards, but they are so close in performance (both are tinted pink) that one of the two is a good representation for my simple comparison.
My LSH-P (first) has slight pink tint in the beam, and the finish is the best of the three (even though it does have the tiger stripes). However....it doesn't appear to be ANY brighter than the other two. The better tint makes up for the disapointing brightness (I figured the LSH-P spec 22 lumens would look brighter than the spec LSH-S 17 lumens--but when I compare mine side by side it doesn't).
All three I like, I'm just trying to decide if the LSH-P is worth the extra $50 (over the standard), when the Arc-4 beats out the LSH-P by a big margin at only $30 extra dollars.
What are your observations and thoughts?