I don't like this arrangement. If SureFire wants to control the price to the end user, it should sell direct exclusively. If SureFire accepts that dealers help them to sell, distribute, support, and advertise their products, they should accept the dealers' money for the product, and let the dealer decide how much $$ must be charged to the consumer in order to make the necessary profit.
I am trying to figure out what legitimate business reason SureFire relies on to stifle competition amongst its dealers.
I am also aware that this practice goes on, to some extent, in many dealer/manufacturer relationships. Palm handheld computers all seem to be the same price pretty much anywhere, for example. But mostly, from what I've seen, manufacturers control this through advertising rebates which are contingent upon advertising only the retail price. SureFire's approach seems extremely strong in this case.