I read article from the forum and This is very interesting.
------- First Article
Got this from a friend this morning via email. Interesting read. Puts
things into the limelight.
This was written by a retired attorney, to his sons, May 19, 2004.
Dear Tom, Kevin, Kirby and Ted,
As your father, I believe I owe it to you to share some thoughts on
the present world situation. We have over the years discussed a lot of
important things, like going to college, jobs and so forth. But this
really takes precedence over any of those discussions. I hope this
might give you a longer term perspective that fewer and fewer of my
generation are left to speak to. To be sure you understand that this
is not politically flavored, I will tell you that since Franklin D.
Roosevelt, who led us through pre and WWII (1933 - 1945) up to and
including our present President, I have without exception, supported
our presidents on all matters of international conflict. This would
include just naming a few in addition to President Roosevelt - WWII:
President Truman - Korean War 1950; President Kennedy - Bay of Pigs
(1961); President Kennedy - Vietnam (1961);[1] eight presidents (5
Republican & 4 Democrat) during the cold war (1945 - 1991); President
Clinton's strikes on Bosnia (1995) and on Iraq (1998).[2] So be sure
you read this as completely non-political or otherwise you will miss
the point.
Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as
we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which
includes WWII). The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the
fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this
war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.
First, let's examine a few basics:
1. When did the threat to us start?
Many will say September 11th, 2001. The answer as far as the United
States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with
the following attacks on us: Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979; Beirut,
Lebanon Embassy 1983; Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983; Lockerbie,
Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988; First New York World Trade
Center attack 1993; Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military
complex 1996; Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
US Embassy 1998; Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000; New York World Trade
Center 2001; Pentagon 2001. (Note that during the period from 1981 to
2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).[3]
2. Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks
happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush
1, Clinton and Bush 2. We can not fault either the Republicans or
Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or
their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.
4. Who were the attackers?
In each case of attacks on US they were Muslims.
5. What is the Muslim population of the World?
25%
6.. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the
predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under
the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that
made no difference. You either went along with the administration or
you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by
the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests). (
http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm ). Thus, almost the same
number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the 6 million
holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of
anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the
world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone
who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the
world - German, Christian or any others. Same with the Muslim
terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -
their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else..[5] The point
here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to
anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may
be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders
and what they are fanatically bent on doing - by their own
pronouncements - killing all of us infidels. I don't blame the
peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?
7. So who are we at war with?
There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than
the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid
verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win
if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
So with that background, now to the two major questions:
1. Can we lose this war?
2. What does losing really mean?
If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.
We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the
major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom
the answer to the second question - 'What does losing mean?'. It would
appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging
our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business,
like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What
losing really means is:
· We would no longer be the premier country in the world.
· The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase.
Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted
us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks
against us over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly to terrorist
attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.
· We would of course have no future support from other nations for
fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see we are
impotent and can not help them.
· They will pick off the other non Muslim nations, one at a time. It
will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage.
It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw
its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists
bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else
they want Spain to do, will be done. Spain is finished.
· The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that
they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are
finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without
us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already
20% Muslim and fading fast. See the attached article on the French
condition by Tom Segel.[6]
· If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life
will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal
with us if they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't stop the
Muslims, how could anyone else? The Muslims fully know what is riding
on this war and therefore are completely committed to winning at any
cost. We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at
any cost.
Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing?
Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and
really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is
going to take that 100% effort to win.
So, how can we lose the war?
Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by imploding. That
is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their
purpose and really digging in and lending full support to the war
effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we
continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win.
Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the
life and death seriousness of this situation.
· President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men
between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow
profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?
This is war. For the duration we are going to have to give up some of
the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be
prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most
certainly lose all of them permanently. And don't worry that it is a
slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII and
immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many
more since then. Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before
him? No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our
Political Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict
and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to
war. Get them out of your head.
· Some of us have gone so far out in our criticism of the war and/or
our Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to
see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are
disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means.
Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we
are divided and weakening, it concerns our friends, and it does great
damage to our cause.
· Of more recent vintage, the uproar fuelled by the politicians and
media, regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps
exemplifies best what I am saying. We have recently had an issue
involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war by a small
group of our military police. These are the type prisoners who just a
few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting
off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering
their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein. And just a
few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of
their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type
enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging their
charred corpses through the streets of Iraq. And still more recently
the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news
sources internationally, of the beheading of an American prisoner they
held. Compare this with some of our press and politicians who for
several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the
"humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners - not burning them, not
dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading
them, but "humiliating" them. Can this be for real? The politicians
and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of
Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and
understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the
life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing
this war, nothing can.
To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this
prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome
burned - totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.
Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.
Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media
people are disloyal. It simply means that they absolutely oblivious to
the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim
terrorists have been pushing us for many years. Remember, the Muslim
terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels. That translates into
all non-Muslims - not just in the United States, but throughout the
world. We are the last bastion of defense.
We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant'. That
charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we
believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the
hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands
tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world. We
can't. If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not
survive, and no other free country in the World will survive if we are
defeated. And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world
that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion,
freedom of the Press, equal rights for anyone - let alone everyone,
equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in
one single way that contributes to the good of the World.
This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war
or we will be equated in the history books to the self inflicted fall
of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow
history books to be written or read.
If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the
Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will
continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to
encroach little by little on the established French traditions. The
French will be fighting among themselves over what should or should
not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any
united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some
external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away,
politically correct piece by politically correct piece. And they are
giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that
they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves,
once they are in power. They have universally shown that when they
have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who
will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from
the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?
I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are
united, there is no way that we can lose. I believe that after the
election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the
critical situation we are in and will unite to save our country. It is
your future we are talking about. Do whatever you can to preserve it.
Love,
Dad
[1] By the way on Vietnam, the emotions are still so high that it is
really not possible to discuss it. However, I think President Kennedy
was correct. He felt there was a communist threat from China, Russia
and North Vietnam to take over that whole area. Also remember that we
were in a 'cold war' with Russia. I frankly think Kennedy's plan
worked and kept that total communist control out, but try telling that
to anyone now. It just isn't politically correct to say so. Historians
will answer this after cool headed research, when the people closest
to it are all gone.
[2]As you know, I am a strong President Bush supporter and will vote
for him. However, if Senator Kerry is elected, I will fully support
him on all matters of international conflict, just as I have supported
all presidents in the past.
[3] Source for statistics in Par. 1 is
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001454.html .
[4] The Institute of Islamic Information and Education.
http://www.iiie.net/Intl/PopStats.html
[5] Note the attached article by Tom Segel referred to in Foot Note 6
infra, the terrorist Muslim have already begun the havoc in France.
(The note was not attached to the e-mail I received. Gene)
[6] I checked this article with two sources - Hoax Busters and Urban
Myths. It does not come up as a Hoax on either. I also then e-mailed
Mr. Segel and he confirmed the article was his.
[7] "I don't think the Army or any branch of service runs any type of
war any more. It's done by senators and congressmen. There are too
many civilians involved." Returning Iraq veteran, Sgt. 1st Class Greg
Klees as quoted in the Cedar Rapids, IA Gazette on May13th, 2004.
[8] There are 64 Muslim countries. This does not count countries like
Spain that are controlled by the Muslim terrorists.
--------------- Second Article
Other interesting article.
http://www.time.com/time/columnist/krauthammer/article/0,9565,661053,00.html
------- First Article
Got this from a friend this morning via email. Interesting read. Puts
things into the limelight.
This was written by a retired attorney, to his sons, May 19, 2004.
Dear Tom, Kevin, Kirby and Ted,
As your father, I believe I owe it to you to share some thoughts on
the present world situation. We have over the years discussed a lot of
important things, like going to college, jobs and so forth. But this
really takes precedence over any of those discussions. I hope this
might give you a longer term perspective that fewer and fewer of my
generation are left to speak to. To be sure you understand that this
is not politically flavored, I will tell you that since Franklin D.
Roosevelt, who led us through pre and WWII (1933 - 1945) up to and
including our present President, I have without exception, supported
our presidents on all matters of international conflict. This would
include just naming a few in addition to President Roosevelt - WWII:
President Truman - Korean War 1950; President Kennedy - Bay of Pigs
(1961); President Kennedy - Vietnam (1961);[1] eight presidents (5
Republican & 4 Democrat) during the cold war (1945 - 1991); President
Clinton's strikes on Bosnia (1995) and on Iraq (1998).[2] So be sure
you read this as completely non-political or otherwise you will miss
the point.
Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as
we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which
includes WWII). The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the
fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this
war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.
First, let's examine a few basics:
1. When did the threat to us start?
Many will say September 11th, 2001. The answer as far as the United
States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with
the following attacks on us: Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979; Beirut,
Lebanon Embassy 1983; Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983; Lockerbie,
Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988; First New York World Trade
Center attack 1993; Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military
complex 1996; Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
US Embassy 1998; Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000; New York World Trade
Center 2001; Pentagon 2001. (Note that during the period from 1981 to
2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).[3]
2. Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks
happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush
1, Clinton and Bush 2. We can not fault either the Republicans or
Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or
their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.
4. Who were the attackers?
In each case of attacks on US they were Muslims.
5. What is the Muslim population of the World?
25%
6.. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the
predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under
the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that
made no difference. You either went along with the administration or
you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by
the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests). (
http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm ). Thus, almost the same
number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the 6 million
holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of
anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the
world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone
who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the
world - German, Christian or any others. Same with the Muslim
terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -
their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else..[5] The point
here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to
anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may
be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders
and what they are fanatically bent on doing - by their own
pronouncements - killing all of us infidels. I don't blame the
peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?
7. So who are we at war with?
There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than
the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid
verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win
if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
So with that background, now to the two major questions:
1. Can we lose this war?
2. What does losing really mean?
If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.
We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the
major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom
the answer to the second question - 'What does losing mean?'. It would
appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging
our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business,
like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What
losing really means is:
· We would no longer be the premier country in the world.
· The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase.
Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted
us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks
against us over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly to terrorist
attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.
· We would of course have no future support from other nations for
fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see we are
impotent and can not help them.
· They will pick off the other non Muslim nations, one at a time. It
will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage.
It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw
its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists
bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else
they want Spain to do, will be done. Spain is finished.
· The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that
they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are
finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without
us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already
20% Muslim and fading fast. See the attached article on the French
condition by Tom Segel.[6]
· If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life
will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal
with us if they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't stop the
Muslims, how could anyone else? The Muslims fully know what is riding
on this war and therefore are completely committed to winning at any
cost. We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at
any cost.
Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing?
Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and
really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is
going to take that 100% effort to win.
So, how can we lose the war?
Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by imploding. That
is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their
purpose and really digging in and lending full support to the war
effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we
continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win.
Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the
life and death seriousness of this situation.
· President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men
between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow
profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?
This is war. For the duration we are going to have to give up some of
the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be
prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most
certainly lose all of them permanently. And don't worry that it is a
slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII and
immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many
more since then. Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before
him? No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our
Political Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict
and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to
war. Get them out of your head.
· Some of us have gone so far out in our criticism of the war and/or
our Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to
see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are
disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means.
Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we
are divided and weakening, it concerns our friends, and it does great
damage to our cause.
· Of more recent vintage, the uproar fuelled by the politicians and
media, regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps
exemplifies best what I am saying. We have recently had an issue
involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war by a small
group of our military police. These are the type prisoners who just a
few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting
off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering
their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein. And just a
few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of
their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type
enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging their
charred corpses through the streets of Iraq. And still more recently
the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news
sources internationally, of the beheading of an American prisoner they
held. Compare this with some of our press and politicians who for
several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the
"humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners - not burning them, not
dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading
them, but "humiliating" them. Can this be for real? The politicians
and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of
Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and
understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the
life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing
this war, nothing can.
To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this
prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome
burned - totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.
Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.
Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media
people are disloyal. It simply means that they absolutely oblivious to
the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim
terrorists have been pushing us for many years. Remember, the Muslim
terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels. That translates into
all non-Muslims - not just in the United States, but throughout the
world. We are the last bastion of defense.
We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant'. That
charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we
believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the
hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands
tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world. We
can't. If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not
survive, and no other free country in the World will survive if we are
defeated. And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world
that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion,
freedom of the Press, equal rights for anyone - let alone everyone,
equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in
one single way that contributes to the good of the World.
This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war
or we will be equated in the history books to the self inflicted fall
of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow
history books to be written or read.
If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the
Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will
continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to
encroach little by little on the established French traditions. The
French will be fighting among themselves over what should or should
not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any
united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some
external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away,
politically correct piece by politically correct piece. And they are
giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that
they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves,
once they are in power. They have universally shown that when they
have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who
will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from
the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?
I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are
united, there is no way that we can lose. I believe that after the
election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the
critical situation we are in and will unite to save our country. It is
your future we are talking about. Do whatever you can to preserve it.
Love,
Dad
[1] By the way on Vietnam, the emotions are still so high that it is
really not possible to discuss it. However, I think President Kennedy
was correct. He felt there was a communist threat from China, Russia
and North Vietnam to take over that whole area. Also remember that we
were in a 'cold war' with Russia. I frankly think Kennedy's plan
worked and kept that total communist control out, but try telling that
to anyone now. It just isn't politically correct to say so. Historians
will answer this after cool headed research, when the people closest
to it are all gone.
[2]As you know, I am a strong President Bush supporter and will vote
for him. However, if Senator Kerry is elected, I will fully support
him on all matters of international conflict, just as I have supported
all presidents in the past.
[3] Source for statistics in Par. 1 is
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001454.html .
[4] The Institute of Islamic Information and Education.
http://www.iiie.net/Intl/PopStats.html
[5] Note the attached article by Tom Segel referred to in Foot Note 6
infra, the terrorist Muslim have already begun the havoc in France.
(The note was not attached to the e-mail I received. Gene)
[6] I checked this article with two sources - Hoax Busters and Urban
Myths. It does not come up as a Hoax on either. I also then e-mailed
Mr. Segel and he confirmed the article was his.
[7] "I don't think the Army or any branch of service runs any type of
war any more. It's done by senators and congressmen. There are too
many civilians involved." Returning Iraq veteran, Sgt. 1st Class Greg
Klees as quoted in the Cedar Rapids, IA Gazette on May13th, 2004.
[8] There are 64 Muslim countries. This does not count countries like
Spain that are controlled by the Muslim terrorists.
--------------- Second Article
Other interesting article.
http://www.time.com/time/columnist/krauthammer/article/0,9565,661053,00.html
