KevinL
Flashlight Enthusiast
As most of you are no doubt aware, you can force an automatic transmission to hold a gear by downshifting, however most of the time on a 4-speed auto you are supposed to just select D4 and let the auto do its job. That's what it's made for.
I've heard from friends and other sources that 'rowing through the gears' on an automatic transmission (AT) will induce unexpected wear and tear and other side effects on the AT. By this I mean driving an AT just like a manual transmission stick shift, shifting to 1, moving off, shifting to 2, 3, and 4 stepping up through the gears. This way you can drag a lower gear a little bit longer before shifting, for slightly more performance, or forcibly drop a gear to take advantage of engine/compression braking without having to hit the service brakes. I'm aware that the compression braking effect translates into more slippage in the torque converter and thus more heating of the automatic transmission fluid, but otherwise should be no different from a stick shift.
Technically, I can't think of any reason why this would induce any more wear on an automatic transmission. Shifting the AT gear lever to hold a lower gear, letting you drag a little bit more before shifting up should not stress the AT any more than a stick shift. Is there something I'm missing?
I've heard from friends and other sources that 'rowing through the gears' on an automatic transmission (AT) will induce unexpected wear and tear and other side effects on the AT. By this I mean driving an AT just like a manual transmission stick shift, shifting to 1, moving off, shifting to 2, 3, and 4 stepping up through the gears. This way you can drag a lower gear a little bit longer before shifting, for slightly more performance, or forcibly drop a gear to take advantage of engine/compression braking without having to hit the service brakes. I'm aware that the compression braking effect translates into more slippage in the torque converter and thus more heating of the automatic transmission fluid, but otherwise should be no different from a stick shift.
Technically, I can't think of any reason why this would induce any more wear on an automatic transmission. Shifting the AT gear lever to hold a lower gear, letting you drag a little bit more before shifting up should not stress the AT any more than a stick shift. Is there something I'm missing?