Minimoog
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Messages
- 771
There has been a lot of debate over SureFire U2's over the past few weeks, however one point stood out to me (forgot now who made it) about the serial numbers - low numbers being better.
My colleagues U2 is numbered in the 600's and is daylight white at all levels (almost no colour shift) and has barely any doughnut hole. Now there have been some problems with U2's and I would be very interested in hearing about any good or bad ones and what the serial number are. I have a theory that due to the demand for U2's, that they were being rushed out to meet orders without the care in manufacturing that they should have had, and that the 'first run' were built to a higher standard.
I think that this would interest all potential U2 buyers as well as highlight any possible problems. Perhaps you could list your serial number and any observations (good/bad beam, dirt under glass and tint).
Lets have your feedback!
Ian
My colleagues U2 is numbered in the 600's and is daylight white at all levels (almost no colour shift) and has barely any doughnut hole. Now there have been some problems with U2's and I would be very interested in hearing about any good or bad ones and what the serial number are. I have a theory that due to the demand for U2's, that they were being rushed out to meet orders without the care in manufacturing that they should have had, and that the 'first run' were built to a higher standard.
I think that this would interest all potential U2 buyers as well as highlight any possible problems. Perhaps you could list your serial number and any observations (good/bad beam, dirt under glass and tint).
Lets have your feedback!
Ian