LED and incandescent are both great and useful and have their strengths and weaknesses. I find LED's to be more immediately appealing, but even so, when I have a good incan and a good LED side by side, and I switch back and forth, I usually come back to the incan for color rendition and throw, and to the LED for flood and indoor or outdoor close range work lighting. It's not that LED's can't throw--they certainly can--but the incan beam is better at cutting through fog and ambient lighting, all other things being equal.
To my mind, both are useful and valuable, but if there isn't some sort of quantum leap in incan technology, it will eventually be completely superceded by LED lighting, which just keeps getting better and better. Personally, I don't mind giving up some output for an increase in light quality, for either incans or LED's, but I'm mainly thinking LED's here. And for incans, this is why I love my A2. "only" 50 lumens, but boy o boy, I really like those 50. I'm of the opinion that lumens are not fungible. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/evilgrin07.gif