QIII mod info needed

slyk

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
1
Looking for how to do the DD mod and where to purchase the ims 20mm reflector for this light (looking for longer throw).
Thanks!!!
slyk
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
QIII Direct Drive mod

First you will need to open the bezel. Instructions here.

Personally, I use a hair dryer and protection gloves. I heat the zone between bezel ad body, turning the light slowly and each 10 seconds or so I try to open it (be carefull with the clip, you can bend it). Usually it will not take more than one minute. If you want to take out the reflector, do it immediately, while the head is hot.

Once opened this is what you should see:
q3dd-0.jpg


You have to unscrew the plastic retaining ring, for this I use scissors. Then take out the light module. Be carefull not to loose the copper contact ring that it is under it.
q3dd-1.jpg


Now you have to unsolder the wires to separate the luxeon and the driver.

q3dd-2.jpg


At this moment you can choose to also exchange the luxeon to a better bin, and also the heat sink, that as you can see it is small. ViReN has great heat sinks for the Q-III that you can find here

You will need also to make a PCB for the battery contact similar to the original one:

q3dd-3.jpg


I personally prefer to reuse the Q-III inefficient board. I just unsolder all the components, and then using a DMM look for the continuity points for anode and cathode. This is the final result:

q3dd-4.jpg


Now put everything back (don't forget the copper ring) are you are done. I put some thermal grease (I use Artic Ceramique) in the sides of the heat sink, but be careful not to isolate the PCB from the copper ring and the body.

The DD Q-III works great with Li-ion batteries, see the runtime chart for a TWOJ (it is safer to use a *K bin)

q3DDruntime.png


After that it will run for hours (I stopped at 8) with a dimm light, and still going over 2.7v, so you can use unprotected cells without problem.

However, forget about regular CR123, they directly will produce a dimm light (probably during days)

About the IMS 20 reflectors I bought mine from PhotonFanatic.
 

wmpwi

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
348
Location
Western Michigan
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

You've got some great shots there, but how does the DD beam shot with the non stock reflector compare w/ the standard driver and reflector. (1 more picture's worth a 1K words) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif Thanks
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

DD does not improve brightness, just efficiency, and as a consecuence runtime. So it makes little sense to compare beam shots of DD and standard driver.

The IMS 20mm reflector however, it has a clear effect in the beam, making it less "round" and improving throw.

Left: DD Q3 Li-ion TWOJ IMS 20mm
Right: DD Q3 Li-ion TWOJ Standard reflector

q3beams4.jpg


The same image post-processed in PS to show light intensity.

q3beams5.jpg


For reference, let's see a comparison with a standard Q3.

Left: DD Q3 Li-ion TWOJ IMS 20mm
Center: DD Q3 Li-ion TWOJ Standard reflector
Right: Stock Q3 CR123 SX1K Standard reflector

q3beams1.jpg

q3beams3.jpg
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Nice Mod... Simple and Lucid /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Thanks luminaria .. its nice to see the comparitive "hotspots"

... luminaria ... What's the current drain levels for fully charged Li-Ion for TWOJ

For TWOK .. its 1.12 Amp to start with.
 

Galiphrey

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
308
Location
Georgia
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

ViReN,

Do you recommend using any kind of thermally conductive goo, like Arctic Silver, between the star and the copper?

Edit: upon a more careful reading, I have found the answer is YES. (Sorry about that.)

>>I put some thermal grease (I use Artic Ceramique)
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Yep you will probably have to use AS, AC etc.. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

ViReN,
here are the current levels when measuring with the open tailcap:

TWOJ-V-A.gif


However, as I have discussed in other threads, with the incredulity of some members including you /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif, when you then put the tailcap resistance in the circuit, the currents are significantly lower, starting at 850-900ma and going down.
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Hello luminaria,

I think... the current levels could be low because of limitation of the Spring Resistance? and the Switch Resistance that comes in between....

Also, How were you able to measure current flowing when tailcap is in action?
 

chevrofreak

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
2,543
Location
Billings, Montana, USA
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

to limit spring resistance I stuffed the large part of the spring with aluminum foil, then put a ball of foil in the open tapered end so they make contact when the tailcap is screwed on. I gained over 200 lux in my TW0J R123 Q3
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

I only use the unmounted spring, like in this photo:
q3current.jpg


I imagine that the full tailcap will add a little more resistance. Anyway the point is that the final current is way lower than the one you measure in the left photo, and really a TWOJ in a DD Q3 will never go to damaging overdrive levels.

Unless you make like Chevrofreak and cancel the spring resistance... However I think that it is not a good idea. Those final 200 lux you are getting are costing you 0.5A more, reducing the runtime and soon will be lost due to luxeon degradation. And all for an increment that your perception is unable to notice.

As a sample look at the LionCub on high level: It starts at 1.8A and runtime is only 25 minutes. This is just because the LionCub is effectively DD, and has zero resistance in the full electrical path (gold coated spring, special internal coating). So you get half the runtime of a DD Q3, a luxeon that will degrade quickly, and just 300 lux more...
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

So, this means that it is infact a good thing to have some sort of resistance... you will get 2 times runtime and have more LED Life... and just 300 lux less than that of LC...

also to note that QIII is a Best Bang for the Buck... even with the DD & Heat Sink... it is well below the $50 mark... and to have just 300 lux less than that of LC which is $300 ....
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Well ViReN, that does not make justice to Mr Bulk creations, price it is not based in just the lux mark.

I have a LionHeart and the first time I saw and touched it I was really impressed, it felt more like a perfect luxury object rather than a flashlight. And the UI is also pure art, almost perfect. Really not comparable to a QIII.
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif I understand.... I have no less respect to Mr Bulk's Creations. They are of course a class of it's own. and his creations are near to perfect and as rightly said purest form of art.

I was just comparing 2 figures ... $300 & $30 /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
and comparing the Output .... with 300 Lux Difference.
while Other Factors (like asthetics, UI, Quality, Name, Fame were away from it)
I know it wont be a good thing to compare QIII with LC... in fact there is no comparison on that front if we consider light as a whole /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Should I work out Cost Difference ? ... 1000% ? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif ... QIII & LC dont have any comparison NewBie...

QIII .. is like Poor Man's Light /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif ...and I am a poor man by the way /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
LC... well every one knows what LC is...

I have found one way to increase Current... Simply Dip the Spring in Copper Sulphate Solution ... or even a Copper Chloride solution will do... (some Anode & Cathode) apply small voltage (3-6) & let .5A to 1A flow... and in minutes you will have a Good Copper Plated Spring. Resistance will Drastically reduce /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Remember, CuSO4 & CuCl3 Solutions are Dangerous... Handle with Great Care...

After doing this... A Jeweller has promised me to do a very thin coat of Gold .... at cheap price of course...
 

ViReN

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
3,078
Location
CPFReviews.com
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

A Glass Beaker / Jar /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif a couple of D Cells .. that's it /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 

luminaria

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
125
Location
Spain
Re: QIII Direct Drive mod

Let me insist /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dedhorse.gif that increasing the current above certain levels gets you very little (and soon nothing) at a too high cost.

I will show it with a real life example using data of some measurements I did a few weeks ago in a DD QIII:

current: 820ma -> lux: 1350 (with resistored spring)
current: 1440ma -> lux: 1620 (unresistored)

A 75% increase in current translates to only a 20% increase in luminosity /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif

Advantages: you get a 20% increase in luminosity. Wow! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/buttrock.gif Nope! Many people do not grab the fact that due to the logarithmic nature of your visual perception, you will practically not notice the difference . When I received my luxmeter I did some tests and I had difficulties to clearly notice a 50% increase in luminosity.

Disadvantages: your luxeon WILL notice the corresponding 75% increase in current and the 5W level overdrive. Not even your copper heatsinks will be able to properly disipate such heat. Soon you luminosity increase will turn luminosity decrease (but a good point is that probably you will not notice until it gets down to 50% /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif) Vf shift will do things worst in the next 50 hours...

Pluses: your runtime will be reduced to 57% of your original one.

In resume, you get a short-lived light that seems no brighter than before, but runs half the time and gets a lot hotter. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbsdown.gif

I am afraid that these problems are going on, mostly unnoticed in a lot of DD lights, like the Raw, the Lion family, the DD Jil when overdriven with R123s,...

I bought a Lionheart with few hours of use according to his previous owner and in mint state. But it only gave 1250 lux for a TWOJ, which it is a very low reading with a 27mm reflector. I exchanged the star with a new one, same bin, and it went up to 2400 lux.

If the old luxeon were a worst case T-bin and the new one a best case T-bin, the Luxeon lottery would account for a 30% increase in luminosity. But I got a 90% increase. So I think the only explanation is that the old luxeon was severely degraded, and that after only a few hours of use...

I think that the clever thing to do is not to copper/gold plate the spring but the opposite, to increase resistance a little.
 
Top