[ QUOTE ]
conejo said:
Thanks for your replies.
(one doubt, I do not understand how it is possible that overall measure can be lower than throw).
I will read more about aleph and elektrolumens options.
Thanks again.
[/ QUOTE ]
The Diamond 3 watt drop in modules do the same thing.
Diamond Review
An over simplified expanation is that these lights, when focused, are designed to make most of their light go forward in a very tight and bright beam. Their surrounding corona's, while giving useable light, are quite dark in comparison.
These tight bright beams are uniquely suited to giving high lux readings at one meter as that tight beam can be focused right on the light sensor.
Quickbeam's light measurement box reads light at a 90 degree angle to the beam and also the refected light. The idea is to get an over all picture of the light's general illuminating capacity. It makes sense that these lights have higher beam reading then overall readings as they are designed to maximize throw. Think of it like this, these lights are better at lighting up objects 100+ feet away then they are at evenly and brightly lighting rooms using ceiling bounce.
Don't let the high lux readings at one meter fool you either.
My Elektrolumens Tristar Phazer has a lux reading of 3,000 @ 1 meter
My Elektroumens Quad has a lux reading of 4,000 @ 1 meter with Fraen LP's in it.
My Diamond drop in module has has lux reading of 4,700 @ one meter
BOTH my Phazer and Quad will illuminate object 100+ yards away better then my Mag with the Drop in module. The reason for the disparity between the numbers and real world performance is due, at least in part, to the fact that the multi-LED lights are not as efficient at focusing all of their light on a meter sensor 3 feet away.
I hope this helps answer your question.
Take Care,
mtbkndad /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink2.gif