Icebreak
Flashlight Enthusiast
There are Katrina threads open on specific aspects of the general topic. Some of the posts make reference to performance and responsibilties of officials. I'm opening this thread so as to not take the other threads off of their topic. The following are some of my opinions on duty, morality and strength.
Duty is a word and concept that escapes the understanding of many in public service. It is the work and actions performed as an obligation to moral or legal reasoning. In emergency situations, if need be, the morality aspect should supercede the written law aspect. What is just and right is in the spirit of the law. If need be, officials should make a rapid effort to grasp a more thorough understanding of the law then interpret it with a focus on the spirit. Skillful finesse can be employed to affect the resulting actions. Those that are duty bound should satisfy their obligation first and let the powers that be decide the consequences.
Leaders by definition lead others. "Let's do this now." would have been a good thought and a just imperative.
I don't think the POTUS is exceedingly bright or a grand leader. He's a politician so I don't expect him to be a real genius. I do expect him to perform his duty. From some of his recent decisions, I don't think he fully understands and accepts the true nature of obligation to duty. He should have performed better. He may simply not have the ability to perform at the level this emergency required. I would have liked to have seen much better mobility capability via better staging and a little speedier initial reaction.
Though I'm not the biggest fan of our president and I cringe when he says, "doodie"; I'm not going to wholly blame him for the slow response. I do respect his office and believe he thinks he is a well-intended fellow. Certainly this was a logistical challenge never before seen. It is, however, ultimately his responsibility and duty to take actions that best protect and care for the lives and well being of US citizens. That did not happen. 'best protect and care'
Then we have, "The president will not let any form of bureaucracy get in the way of protecting the citizens of Louisiana." which is exactly what did happen.
Above that, I think that one would have fallen short of attaining the greater view and good understanding of the complexities of how a society arrives at a condition that allowed for this tragedy to have such a heavy impact, to take a simplistic shot at one man to take the blame.
The FEMA director did not do well. He's made many statements this week that would cause one to believe he may be living on another planet. Didn't seem to have a clue. Wed., "NOLA is not flooding." Before coming to work for FEMA he was the director of an Equestrian Association and resigned that position under pressure. Those folks are bewildered as to how he qualifies to be director of FEMA. His college roommate brought him on board. He took over when his buddy left. The president thinks he's doing a great job.
The head of Homeland Security could have done better. He has six emergency fire-fighting units staged for disasters. Says he can't deploy unless Louisiana specifically asks for that deployment. The Louisiana governor has been screaming for help. He should deploy. This goes back to the morality of duty being more important than the law of duty. He can deploy and not lose his job. It just requires some interpretation and finesse.
The governor of Louisiana could have done better. Worked faster, smarter. Same for the mayor of NOLA. It goes on. Other public servants could have done better too.
What about this, "understanding of the complexities of how a society arrives at a condition that allowed for this tragedy to have such a heavy impact" I spoke of? I only understand a little of it. The officials mentioned above are paid to protect and care for citizens through judicious governing. What about the citizen? What about me? I spoke about morality but what about my own? I've known that New Orleans and Louisiana needed funding for levee bolstering improvements for years. I didn't write a letter. I didn't make a phone call. I didn't do a thing. That's apathy and it's part of the complex problem.
This week a letter will go out to my fed senators and representatives urging them to do what they can to get rid of that FEMA director. The POTUS and the director of Homeland Security? I'll have no official complaint about them. Tough, tough jobs. Meanwhile, it has been reported that two New Orleans police officers have committed suicide. I really don't want to be too harsh in my performance assessment of those in authority. I wasn't standing in their boots.
Arkansas is a poor state economically speaking. I don't want to paint the wrong picture for you. Where I live is mostly beautiful with the expected poor neighborhoods. Some folks would be surprised at the sight of some of our affluent neighborhoods. Homes that are quite breathtaking with great views of the pretty river, lakes, golf courses etc. We've got some scary neighborhoods too.
I don't agree with everything our governor does but he has been able to operate the state within budget with a tiny surplus of 300 million dollars or so. I support him. Wed. Aug 31st he announced some pretty well thought-out plans for taking on 20,000 Katrina refugees. His plans had a few flaws but he reacted quickly by beginning the hammering out of those plans on Sunday, Aug 28th. He actually studies disaster recovery. The arranged facilities maxed out Saturday so Arkansas is making fast, real-time decisions about where to move folks and how to care for them. There have been some pretty innovative ideas initiated to get this done.
Folks have been asked to give up their reservations for cabins in our state parks and holiday retreat areas and many are doing so. Hospitals are taking on patients. State agency personnel, expert in disaster relief and recovery, insurance, aerial photography, law enforcement, utilities, communications, computer network systems, rescue and medical care were deploying to deep into the Louisiana and Mississippi zones as early as Monday the 29th. Crews of self-organized citizens with official contacts in those states are doing the same. Churches, hotels, furniture stores, community and private clubs as well as individual citizens are feeding people and housing them. Organized suppers and lunches are happening all over the state. Our governor has said, "People first, paperwork later". The surplus we have in our state budget may go away. If it does he's going to take a hit for that. Since the POTUS has declared states of emergency in Texas and Arkansas maybe it won't be as economically impactive as I think it will. Thanks, POTUS.
Tomorrow me and mine will spend most of the day helping a group to feed some of the "new residents" of our city, give personal supplies to the families, toys for the kids and generally let them all know we are going to look after them for an extended period of time.
Who's fault is it that this tragedy could have been avoided to a great extent? I think it is our obligation to analyze and speak up if we don't think the officials handled their duties well. I also think members of society in the US have an obligation to each other to be good stewards and when we know of a problem that can potentially become a disaster to do something about it, even if it is as small as the act of the writing of a letter or just making a telephone call.
I would like to report that today and in the last few days I've witnessed many acts of sacrifice and kindness. It can be a challenge but I believe the majority of the citizens of the USA to be of good moral fiber despite what is reported on the idiot box. America is a great country not because we are militarily or economically powerful. America is a great country because we citizens have grit and insist on right overcoming wrong even if we disagree on how to do it. This is a test. We will do well. We will learn. We will become stronger.
Duty is a word and concept that escapes the understanding of many in public service. It is the work and actions performed as an obligation to moral or legal reasoning. In emergency situations, if need be, the morality aspect should supercede the written law aspect. What is just and right is in the spirit of the law. If need be, officials should make a rapid effort to grasp a more thorough understanding of the law then interpret it with a focus on the spirit. Skillful finesse can be employed to affect the resulting actions. Those that are duty bound should satisfy their obligation first and let the powers that be decide the consequences.
Leaders by definition lead others. "Let's do this now." would have been a good thought and a just imperative.
I don't think the POTUS is exceedingly bright or a grand leader. He's a politician so I don't expect him to be a real genius. I do expect him to perform his duty. From some of his recent decisions, I don't think he fully understands and accepts the true nature of obligation to duty. He should have performed better. He may simply not have the ability to perform at the level this emergency required. I would have liked to have seen much better mobility capability via better staging and a little speedier initial reaction.
Though I'm not the biggest fan of our president and I cringe when he says, "doodie"; I'm not going to wholly blame him for the slow response. I do respect his office and believe he thinks he is a well-intended fellow. Certainly this was a logistical challenge never before seen. It is, however, ultimately his responsibility and duty to take actions that best protect and care for the lives and well being of US citizens. That did not happen. 'best protect and care'
Then we have, "The president will not let any form of bureaucracy get in the way of protecting the citizens of Louisiana." which is exactly what did happen.
Above that, I think that one would have fallen short of attaining the greater view and good understanding of the complexities of how a society arrives at a condition that allowed for this tragedy to have such a heavy impact, to take a simplistic shot at one man to take the blame.
The FEMA director did not do well. He's made many statements this week that would cause one to believe he may be living on another planet. Didn't seem to have a clue. Wed., "NOLA is not flooding." Before coming to work for FEMA he was the director of an Equestrian Association and resigned that position under pressure. Those folks are bewildered as to how he qualifies to be director of FEMA. His college roommate brought him on board. He took over when his buddy left. The president thinks he's doing a great job.
The head of Homeland Security could have done better. He has six emergency fire-fighting units staged for disasters. Says he can't deploy unless Louisiana specifically asks for that deployment. The Louisiana governor has been screaming for help. He should deploy. This goes back to the morality of duty being more important than the law of duty. He can deploy and not lose his job. It just requires some interpretation and finesse.
The governor of Louisiana could have done better. Worked faster, smarter. Same for the mayor of NOLA. It goes on. Other public servants could have done better too.
What about this, "understanding of the complexities of how a society arrives at a condition that allowed for this tragedy to have such a heavy impact" I spoke of? I only understand a little of it. The officials mentioned above are paid to protect and care for citizens through judicious governing. What about the citizen? What about me? I spoke about morality but what about my own? I've known that New Orleans and Louisiana needed funding for levee bolstering improvements for years. I didn't write a letter. I didn't make a phone call. I didn't do a thing. That's apathy and it's part of the complex problem.
This week a letter will go out to my fed senators and representatives urging them to do what they can to get rid of that FEMA director. The POTUS and the director of Homeland Security? I'll have no official complaint about them. Tough, tough jobs. Meanwhile, it has been reported that two New Orleans police officers have committed suicide. I really don't want to be too harsh in my performance assessment of those in authority. I wasn't standing in their boots.
Arkansas is a poor state economically speaking. I don't want to paint the wrong picture for you. Where I live is mostly beautiful with the expected poor neighborhoods. Some folks would be surprised at the sight of some of our affluent neighborhoods. Homes that are quite breathtaking with great views of the pretty river, lakes, golf courses etc. We've got some scary neighborhoods too.
I don't agree with everything our governor does but he has been able to operate the state within budget with a tiny surplus of 300 million dollars or so. I support him. Wed. Aug 31st he announced some pretty well thought-out plans for taking on 20,000 Katrina refugees. His plans had a few flaws but he reacted quickly by beginning the hammering out of those plans on Sunday, Aug 28th. He actually studies disaster recovery. The arranged facilities maxed out Saturday so Arkansas is making fast, real-time decisions about where to move folks and how to care for them. There have been some pretty innovative ideas initiated to get this done.
Folks have been asked to give up their reservations for cabins in our state parks and holiday retreat areas and many are doing so. Hospitals are taking on patients. State agency personnel, expert in disaster relief and recovery, insurance, aerial photography, law enforcement, utilities, communications, computer network systems, rescue and medical care were deploying to deep into the Louisiana and Mississippi zones as early as Monday the 29th. Crews of self-organized citizens with official contacts in those states are doing the same. Churches, hotels, furniture stores, community and private clubs as well as individual citizens are feeding people and housing them. Organized suppers and lunches are happening all over the state. Our governor has said, "People first, paperwork later". The surplus we have in our state budget may go away. If it does he's going to take a hit for that. Since the POTUS has declared states of emergency in Texas and Arkansas maybe it won't be as economically impactive as I think it will. Thanks, POTUS.
Tomorrow me and mine will spend most of the day helping a group to feed some of the "new residents" of our city, give personal supplies to the families, toys for the kids and generally let them all know we are going to look after them for an extended period of time.
Who's fault is it that this tragedy could have been avoided to a great extent? I think it is our obligation to analyze and speak up if we don't think the officials handled their duties well. I also think members of society in the US have an obligation to each other to be good stewards and when we know of a problem that can potentially become a disaster to do something about it, even if it is as small as the act of the writing of a letter or just making a telephone call.
I would like to report that today and in the last few days I've witnessed many acts of sacrifice and kindness. It can be a challenge but I believe the majority of the citizens of the USA to be of good moral fiber despite what is reported on the idiot box. America is a great country not because we are militarily or economically powerful. America is a great country because we citizens have grit and insist on right overcoming wrong even if we disagree on how to do it. This is a test. We will do well. We will learn. We will become stronger.